Kill Dat Noize
Banned
that's more of an indictment on whoever was champion at the time.
you could make the argument that all of those matches featured the rightful world champion.
It's about to get RIDICULOUS?
- Thread starter R=G
- Start date
that's more of an indictment on whoever was champion at the time.
you could make the argument that all of those matches featured the rightful world champion.
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Kill Dat Noize
Banned
No you can't
"Rightful world champion"
why is chris jericho wearing the strap heading into mania while rocky is an active competitor? who's really the top dog on that roster.
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Uh this would be a horrible idea. When you split the brands that means there is going to be less potential opponents so if you double the PPV events that means they are going to run every feud possible into the ground before each "BIG" event and nothing will feel special at all..
All youll get is a huge dose of Reigns on one show and a huge dose of Cena on the other. Ton of Stephanie putting herself over talents too. Cena did all he could do to bury AJ last week but he survived it.I'm looking forward to two a month
Last edited:
Kill Dat Noize
Banned
Because its in the script
By that logic, you wanted a 10 year John Cena reign?
honestly? dare i say it?
not a 10 year reign, obviously you need the occasional transitional champion just to switch things up, but whomever is the top dog should be the one wearing the belt the majority of the time. otherwise what's the point of crowning someone champion.
No. And I don't understand this point y;all keep making.
If the RAW title is on Cena an the SD is on LEsnar, which one is inferior? What's going to make it inferior other than faulty logic from certain fans?
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
So you really want to act like the WHC wasn't inferior to the WWE title?
uhhh yes, because it was the FAILED WCW title. keyword: FAILEDSo you really want to act like the WHC wasn't inferior to the WWE title?
So it automatically had everything working against it.
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
No it wasn't. When HHH had the belt it was treated as the top belt until Batista took it to Smackdown. Then it was treated as a secondary title and whored out with no respect.
CBoz
We Are NXT!
When the WHC title was on Raw and HHH was champ, etc. it was the superior title and the WWE title was not as prominent and vice versa. One title will always take a back set to the other, in time.
it was 2nd tier regardless, b/c WWE had trashed WCW so much. And it's still the belt David Arquette wore and multiple other joke champs.
It wasn't the top title..they just pushed it hard on Raw but Lesnar and Angle were fighting over the real title and Eddie won it from Lesnar. Cripple H was never as respected as those title holders..how could he? He got his title from a suitcase.
Actually it wasn't that belt at all. that belt got absorbed into the Undisputed title they renamed the WWE title once Lesnar took it to Smackdown the night after Summerslam 2002. Bischoff awarded Cripple H the World title whiched looked like the WCW title out of a suitcase in Sept 2002. They tried to make it credible by having him and Benoit and others fight for it but just wasn't the same.