Why everyone make it seem like we came over there and just terrorized the natives?of the first 4,000 only like 1,800 survived after diseases and attacks
Why everyone make it seem like we came over there and just terrorized the natives?of the first 4,000 only like 1,800 survived after diseases and attacks
Americo-Liberians - Wikipedia
a bunch of bougie negros moved to Africa and set up a country and refused to recognize the indigenous population already on the land as citizensthey also stayed on the coast and didn't intermingle with the 'bush' people
They had a good idea, but they carried that internalized white supremacy within them to the point they oppressed the indigenous Africans until they overthrew their rule and forced them out of the country.
I also see the other side, they were more educated than the natives and the country was founded as a safe haven for AA, so they deserved to rule. Also once they were overthrown the nation's economy crumbled with a succession of dictators.
The AAgang in me loves the idea of going into Africa and setting up our own shyt, but the pan Africanist in me knows the fight is global and recreating a form of supremacy that suppresses other blacks is not that answer




How would you propose the u.s. government acquire land for this in Africa?So today if America offered you billions to set up a nation for AA in Africa you wouldn't take it?
now imagine if you lived in a time when slavery still existed
be cool with imperialism as long as it’s done by black folk brehsYeah shyt was weird. I'll just assume OP is just ignorant about the matter.Liberia was control,funded & founded by cacs
American Colonization Society
Robert Finley
![]()
Colonization - The African-American Mosaic Exhibition | Exhibitions (Library of Congress)
Black people are human, just like white people, and humans can be evil as fukk![]()
Yeah shyt was weird. I'll just assume OP is just ignorant about the matter.
Here is the reality though, you remove a group of people from their culture, purposely wipe away their previous culture through attempts to assimilate them into a new slave status in a land not their own and then try to send them back to a land, where they probably didn't originate from (country and area wise, not continent wise) and say here "you're both black, make it work" is a setup to fail.
Black Americans are not Africans, without even making a further distinction of exactly where we originally were taken from since we come from many places in general west Africa. Even today, if a large amount of AA migrated to Ghana for example, its very likely they will be their own social group for a long time and that will probably arise in conflict with people native to the area.
Black Americans at this point can only call America, where they are constantly made to feel unwanted, home. Culturally and socially.
An Asian person migrates to the United States and even a generation or two down the line, they have family and parents who make sure they don't forget where they came from. They don't have a whole institution and society setup to purposely strip them of their identity to make them into slaves. An Americanized Chinese definitely won't be Chinese but he won't be totally out of his element there either due to the traditions and culture passed down from his family.
“Are you stupid? that’s how it actually was, shyt was fukked up by today’s standards but it made sense back then”
brehs like y'all just cacs in black face
same verbiage and logic and all. some cac could flip exactly what you said as a reason why they deserved free labor but yet you fail to see this.
there's no pan african in you breh
A pan African would have said go back and work with and live with not set up own shyt... I understand the sentiment but it betrays your intentions. Liberia 2.0![]()
Using your logic White Americans are more educated than Black Americans so they deserve to be ruled by Whites? You are no Pan Africanist, no Pan Africanist will support the colonization of any African. The only thing African about you is your skin color (and that's even debatable) . Everything else about you is European.Americo-Liberians - Wikipedia
a bunch of bougie negros moved to Africa and set up a country and refused to recognize the indigenous population already on the land as citizensthey also stayed on the coast and didn't intermingle with the 'bush' people
They had a good idea, but they carried that internalized white supremacy within them to the point they oppressed the indigenous Africans until they overthrew their rule and forced them out of the country.
I also see the other side, Also once they were overthrown the nation's economy crumbled with a succession of dictators.
The AAgang in me loves the idea of going into Africa and setting up our own shyt, but the pan Africanist in me knows the fight is global and recreating a form of supremacy that suppresses other blacks is not that answer
They would have wanted all the smoke with other Africans from neighbouring countries moving in as well. You need to think outside your circle sometimes. Land conflicts are probably one of the biggest reasons for crime and murder all over Africa and you are saying just go take some land n set up shop. That will never go over well anywhere. We butcher other tribes for that you are no exception, no one is. Which is why I asked how is land being "acquired" exactly?so you think the native Liberians would be welcoming and accept blacks from a completely different culture and background?
:Motherlandmjpls:
soon as they set foot on the land the natives wanted all the smoke.
already been debunked