I guess what I'm saying is, it's not that they don't see the difference.
They do and just prefer Trump because they feel he's shytting on people they hate. They just won't admit it because they don't want to actually defend him.
Its sad it’s still grown black men thinking the democrats will save them
- Thread starter EBK String
- Start date
I guess what I'm saying is, it's not that they don't see the difference.
They do and just prefer Trump because they feel he's shytting on people they hate. They just won't admit it because they don't want to actually defend him.
The Democrats problem is they have no real economic policies besides more immigration and bad trade deals. Mainly because their voters never hold them accountable. So they really had no incentive to develop a decent strategy other than benign neglect.
Republicans aren't much better because they think tax cuts are the answer to everything.
Republicans aren't much better because they think tax cuts are the answer to everything.
Don't most of these Dembootlickers on here have immigrant backgrounds? I don't blame them for being against mass deportations.Aight let it be known you prefer illegal immigrants over the black americans already here at the bottom as long as you not inconvenienced it's cool they get a leg up over us...@JT-Money @TripleAgent
Last edited:
Redwood
Superstar
over THIS???
i am perfectly fine with all of that awful benign neglect if it means a reversion to what existed prior to current state of madness we’re now mired in.
fixed
why dont you take yourself down to the houses and actually question your local representatives after learning about whats currently being debated locally
yall keep acting like money doesnt move the political choices but surprise it has since well before America was a thing
even kings changed up as a function of cashhoards
Look at Warren Buffet over here. Haven't you posted your salary on here? Calm down.
Born2BKing
Veteran
@ The bothsiders and "we need tangibles" crowd saying we want Dems to save us. We ain't the ones asking for money or land from crackers. 
Last edited:
they abandoned worker policies since before WW1
tax cuts can be the answer to many things but so can things like mortgage reforms and changes to basic education
teaching more people about ways to utilize capital that actually builds profits not just "stagnant" equity wealth
if everyone had the farmers logic with mortgages there would likely be no inflation (that I get a mortgage so that my farm pays the mortgage)
jobs by comparison is "my job pays the mortgage but my job isnt my investment so when i die my job doesnt get passed down to who i choose, my employer steals my time forever and im hyon"
All im going to say compare the responses of here to https://www.lipstickalley.com/threa...amage-trump-is-doing-internationally.6067373/
Which forum has more members with a backbone and more informed on politics judging from the responses? We have paid shills in here that cant do shyt but curse people out all day, basically talking in circles not even knowing wtf they are talking about leading back to vote Democrat to be against Trump.
Which forum has more members with a backbone and more informed on politics judging from the responses? We have paid shills in here that cant do shyt but curse people out all day, basically talking in circles not even knowing wtf they are talking about leading back to vote Democrat to be against Trump.
Last edited:
Also lots of Democrat politicians don't come from the private sector. I think that's the real disconnect. If they've worked for the Government damn near their whole lives. They have no clue how things are economically for the average citizen. That's why their answer to everything is to just slap a bandaid fix on it and call it a day.
i was talking to my SO about this the other day but i think something that could completely change all the cities in america is if they introduced an "Occupancy Property Tax Cut"
where if the real estate developers maintain 90%+ occupancy rates they get their property taxes slashed
youd see people moving back to cities, more shops, more reasons to stay closer to a town
and it wouldnt actually influence the reasoning for rent pricing, so many companies could (and should) pass the savings down to their tenants
this is in contrast to section 8 where they are completely subsidizing the renter
not only would this affect residential renters but also commercial renters, ive read that there is like 50% occupancy for basic office space especially after covid with people opting to work from home
where if the real estate developers maintain 90%+ occupancy rates they get their property taxes slashed
youd see people moving back to cities, more shops, more reasons to stay closer to a town
and it wouldnt actually influence the reasoning for rent pricing, so many companies could (and should) pass the savings down to their tenants
this is in contrast to section 8 where they are completely subsidizing the renter
not only would this affect residential renters but also commercial renters, ive read that there is like 50% occupancy for basic office space especially after covid with people opting to work from home
Sauce Mane
Superstar
Mister Terrific
It’s in the name
Every democratic administration has grown the economy and the quality of life for the average American. Every worker protection we have today largely came from democratic institutions.
“Hold them accountable” is a meaningless phrase bothsiders bandy about. You can’t even define what holding them accountable means. Not voting? That’s working out so well.
What’s funny is you would never in a million years hear a white person telling another white person the solution to defeating the democrats is “not voting”
Mister Terrific
It’s in the name
@ORDER_66 really think Cacs gonna vote to give his fatass money
HarlemHottie
Uptown Thoroughbred
It’s sad that Black men say “it’s still” when they should say “there are still”.
In African American Vernacular English (AAVE), the word "it" is frequently used as a "dummy subject" where Standard American English (SAE) would use "there".
Key Differences
- Existence Statements: While SAE uses "There are" or "There is" to indicate the existence of something, AAVE often uses "It's" (a contraction of "it is") regardless of whether the following noun is singular or plural.
- SAE: "There are a lot of people out here."
- AAVE: "It’s a lot of people out here".
- Locational Directions:AAVE speakers often use "it's" to point out the location of a place or object.
- SAE: "There is a bodega two blocks away."
- AAVE: "It's a bodega two blocks away".
Linguistic Context
- Rule-Bound System: Linguists emphasize that AAVE is a rule-bound dialect with its own consistent grammar, not "broken" or "incorrect" English. The use of "it" as an expletive (dummy subject) is a recognized feature of this linguistic system.
- Historical Origins: Using "it" for existence is actually an older English form found in Middle English (e.g., "it is no nede to argue"), which has been retained in AAVE and some other modern dialects.
- Singular vs. Plural: In AAVE, "it's" can precede plural nouns, effectively replacing "there are". For example, a speaker might say "It's four cars in the driveway" instead of "There are four cars...".