Jamaica's Broadcasting Commission BANS songs promoting illegal activity 10/11/22

[get these nets]

For those who have a problem with this, go back and read YOUR own posts about the Alphabet Gang and agendas on tv shows and commercials, on broadcast TV.

Looks funny in the light, compared to what you're saying here about "it won't change anything" "it wont have any effect"

 

[Matt504]

This man just gave you the rundown on the issues that cause crime like unemployment and poverty which is neglected by the government and your autistic ass doubles down on censorship of music.

Your mistake is thinking that I'm saying that censoring music will stop crime.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

I'm serious when I say the record industry needs a sclass action lawsuit from Blacks globally who are not with the riff raff, not with the bullshyt, lies and games..

People are crying about reparations, but the record industry has made billions off the degradation of Blacks, and pushing indignity and violence against us for profit yet they never cut a check to the people's whose image they fukked with.
Just ban the shyt and lets see where this goes..why live with a problem??

it goes online, you've done nothing.

sue the people making the actual music. ask fellow Black people why they enjoy such content. stop looking for scapegoats brothers

 

[Wildhundreds]

This man just gave you the rundown on the issues that cause crime like unemployment and poverty which is neglected by the government and your autistic ass doubles down on censorship of music.

Education is paramount over unemployment and poverty. You give someone stupid a job they can't keep it. You give someone stupid money they'll spend it on dumb shyt and be broke again.. White people keep nikkas broke and unemployed because they make money off of it. If you're not promoting education of black people, you really aren't talking about much.

 

[EBK String]

Your mistake is thinking that I'm saying that censoring music will stop crime.

So you want a feel good initiave that will do nothing about the condition of those at the bottom?

 

[Matt504]

So you want a feel good initiave that will make you feel good and will do nothing about the condition of those at the bottom?

That's not what I'm saying either. I'm 100% in support of measures that improve the conditions of people at the bottom. I am also in support of measures that removes anti-Black content from airwaves. They are two separate things.

 

[African Peasant]

You're missing the point. A community can also be fukked up. Do you really think a fukked up community will teach children right from wrong?
Yet as I stated, this isn't just about the children. This is about what media adults can consume. If an adult can't tell the difference between right and wrong, I'm sorry but that's on them and their parents. Other adults shouldn't have to suffer their foolishness.


Actually, it does. What a government decides to make law and illegal will fundamentally change and define its nature. If it decides to ban media that is against government policies... would you be for that? There are plenty of governments around the world that bans speech and expression on the grounds of morality, ethics, etc. Those places aren't something you and I would think are decent or moral.


I'm sceptical of all governments. I'm not an anarchist or libertarian. However, I'm for limited government. It's a hard principle to maintain but it must do so.


Most people don't.

If you really want to reduce any crime, then it requires proper policing and enforcement of already established laws. For example, there are already laws against murder and theft. Just enforce those laws properly with better policing.
Banning media that 'promotes' illegality is nothing more than jingling keys to distract the governed that the government has failed in its duty.

A community can be fukked up? Yes. The same parents can be fukked up. Those are hypothesis. But the reality remains the same: parents don't raise their kids alone; they raise them along with the community. You can be against it, but it's not realistic, unless you live on an island.

Banning things in itself does not change the nature of government. Because the governement already bans things. Of course, banning certain things will change the nature of the gov. But the act of banning per se does not.

I don't think anyone is advocating for a gov. with full power. And banning the promotion of illegal activities does not make the gov. a tyran. This is nothing but control of the media space. It already exist for many topics in many liberal democracies, especially in western Europe. You can 't say anything on the air.

Crime is not only a matter of applying criminal law. It's also a matter of cultural environment and social impulse. A society who tolerates public and blatant promotion of criminal activities is setting itself of fire.

Having limits is necessary for any society that want to run correctly.

 

[Sauce Dab]

Ain’t half their songs about killing gay people?

If it is then folks on here should hate this rule since the “gay agenda” is on posters mind constantly

 

[African Peasant]

no it doesn't

Jamaica has had laws about foul language for decades. arrested and threatened to arrest high profile acts for swearing on stage. yet the music has gotten much worse over time. people won't change out of nowhere yes but they have to change and be willing to change. you naive thinking a broadcasting law will turn shyt around in 2022. what percentage of explicit content was playing on public media to begin with? i'd wager 0%

stop falling for feel good politics.

let's keep it simple... what is broadcasting?

NONE of the shyt they are trying to deal with is on those mediums uncensored. Sure ban content/subject matter but the kids are not listening on broadcast. it's like trying to attack road traffic by putting lights and speed bumps in water ways

Jamaica does not making it work does not mean censorship does not work.

As I said, as long as you have the mean to enforce it, it works. Controling the flux of informations works. But you need the proper tools to do so.

There is reason why during the Iranian riots Obama was insisting for Twitter to stay open when the regime was trying by any means to censor it.

You can act on a culture if you control the flux of information that it consumes.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

Jamaica does not making it work does not mean censorship does not work.

As I said, as long as you have the mean to enforce it, it works. Controling the flux of informations works. But you need the proper tools to do so.

There is reason why during the Iranian riots Obama was insisting for Twitter to stay open when the regime was trying by any means to censor it.

You can act on a culture if you control the flux of information that it consumes.

censorship doesn't work. everyone who grew up being told not to listen to certain shyt snuck it in anyway. they had to learn for themselves what was acceptable and what wasn't despite what their parents told them. in the end good values win not censorship. they are controlling broadcast. most information is on the internet... what are you not getting?

kids are not about to cry that they can't listen to questionable music on tv and radio they are on fukking line

glad you mention culture. only cultural change will last and that's not censorship but actual consciously opting out from the bullshyt.

those regimes censor media to hide atrocities and stop reporting of them. the people were not falling for the regimes viewpoints. they live in fear and are controlled by fear. that doesn't mean they are uninformed because the information is controlled. you can act on a culture by making culturally relevant moves like addressing the mediums people actually use today.

 

[African Peasant]

censorship doesn't work. everyone who grew up being told not to listen to certain shyt snuck it in anyway. they had to learn for themselves

Thats's why everyone in Germany has read Mean Kampf.

they are controlling broadcast. most information is on the internet... what are you not getting

kids are not about to cry that they can't listen to questionable music on tv and radio they are on fukking line

Did I say what they are doing is sufficient or enough? Did I sayJamaica found the recipe of something?

I clearly said that censorship works when you have the mean to enforce it.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

Thats's why everyone in Germany has read Mean Kampf.




Did I say what they are doing is sufficient or enough? Did I sayJamaica found the recipe of something?

I clearly said that censorship works when you have the mean to enforce it.

they haven't read it but they can and most still chose not to because most Germans actually look down on that past. even your examples are outdated. you could find a copy of mean kampf right now faster than it took you to type those sentences.

Spoiler

shyt is on the google search results and you can read it for free, found it without trying. your joking brother.

censorship works? NO IT DOESN'T and you haven't presented one valid RELEVANT example

 

[African Peasant]

they haven't read it but they can and most still chose not to because most Germans actually look down on that past. even your examples are outdated. you could find a copy of mean kampf right now faster than it took you to type those sentences.

Spoiler

shyt is on the google search results and you can read it for free, found it without trying. your joking brother.

censorship works? NO IT DOESN'T and you haven't presented one valid RELEVANT example

 

[EarlyEarly]

"music that promotes or glorifies lottery scamming"?

When this track dropped shyt went into overdrive

 

[Devilinurear]

Does nothing
Most people consume music through the internet.