Jason Lee reads text message from Tory Lanez saying he didn’t snitch on Kelsey in order to protect Meg and Kelsey
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Dzali OG
Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
So the temperature in this thread reads "Well.....maybe he didn't shoot Meg but leave him in prison for being stupid"?
If the bodyguard was there, his statement isn't hearsay. No more than the other witness who said he saw Tory shoot.
But what's really important is, was his dna indeed not on the gun!
We have a problem of people hating to be wrong and would rather have a innocent man in prison than correct the wrong. I'm glad I go into discussions unbiased...so I can admit when I was wrong.
If the bodyguard was there, his statement isn't hearsay. No more than the other witness who said he saw Tory shoot.
But what's really important is, was his dna indeed not on the gun!
We have a problem of people hating to be wrong and would rather have a innocent man in prison than correct the wrong. I'm glad I go into discussions unbiased...so I can admit when I was wrong.
Maximus Rex
Superstar
Bodyguard wasn't there. he said he overheard Kelsey say she shot Meg when Kelsey was talking to her husband, which can be considered hearsey
His DNA was inconclusive on the gun, means it didn't rule him out or exclude him, that's important but you are gonna ignore that the victim said he did it, Kelsey in her original statement to the police said he did it, Kelsey text message to Meg's security that Tory shot her after it happened, Tory want to play quiet on his side of the events for whatever reason
Then you want to go into a spiel about an innocent man being in prison then talk about how you are unbiased
Then yall shocked and surprised he was found guilty
O.T.I.S.
Veteran
Not until that hard evidence drops
O.T.I.S.
Veteran
Exactly
nikkas be wanting dudes they jealous of or some shyt to be doing time for crimes regardless if they committed them or not.
That DNA shyt should’ve got the case tossed
MicIsGod
They like what that mean
Tory sparked it on some “you don’t even know I’m fukkin Meg now”
Kelsey lost it after that. That’s why he called her.
Dzali OG
Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Bodyguard wasn't there. he said he overheard Kelsey say she shot Meg when Kelsey was talking to her husband, which can be considered hearsey
His DNA was inconclusive on the gun, means it didn't rule him out or exclude him, that's important but you are gonna ignore that the victim said he did it, Kelsey in her original statement to the police said he did it, Kelsey text message to Meg's security that Tory shot her after it happened, Tory want to play quiet on his side of the events for whatever reason
Then you want to go into a spiel about an innocent man being in prison then talk about how you are unbiased
Then yall shocked and surprised he was found guilty
Ok the guard wasn't there.
The defense lied about there only being one dna test of the gun. There were three. From what I understand ONE of them was inconclusive and the other two negative. And the DA did not mention the two tests that were negative. I think that's what the appeal is centered around.
As far as what Meg and kelsey say, that holds weight to me, but I understand they were all drunk af so they may not know what really happened. I can see a scenario where Kelsey was shooting and Tory grabbed or slapped her hand downward making a bullet ricochet into Meg. I guess that would sort of count as him shooting her.
I said he's innocent in a hypothetical manner. I'm really not invested one way or the other and I wasn't there. So im weighing both options in an unbiased manner.
Last edited:
Dzali OG
Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Did Tory slap Kelsey hand while she was shooting, or did the gun accidently discharge while he was taking it from her?
Did he take the pink gun from Kelsey and in the moment shoot it in the air in some goofy shyt to break up the fight?
Or did he INTENTIONALLY shoot at the feet of Megan?
These things I would weigh into the situation. While some ni99as make it cut and dry that he shot at her saying dance bytch.
Did he take the pink gun from Kelsey and in the moment shoot it in the air in some goofy shyt to break up the fight?
Or did he INTENTIONALLY shoot at the feet of Megan?
These things I would weigh into the situation. While some ni99as make it cut and dry that he shot at her saying dance bytch.
Dzali OG
Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
And then it's being discussed that the DA and DOC know they are fukked if Tory's case is overturned. Then every case that DA has convicted would be reviewed.
On top of Tory suing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.
Because the talk is that a hit was put on Tory in the prison by the actual prison staff! Because he was stabbed up after Tory's team announced his appeal. The appeal was announced on Friday and he was stabbed on Monday.
nikkas who know California prison are saying that's what it looks like. A CO from that prison is saying that's what it looks like. Someone from the staff paid the Mexicans who gave the chomo Mexican orders to kill Tory.
Right now it's just ni99a talk and conspiracy though it looks real suspicious. State of California can't afford to have that scandal cause the bag Tory would get will be ENORMOUS.
On top of Tory suing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.
Because the talk is that a hit was put on Tory in the prison by the actual prison staff! Because he was stabbed up after Tory's team announced his appeal. The appeal was announced on Friday and he was stabbed on Monday.
nikkas who know California prison are saying that's what it looks like. A CO from that prison is saying that's what it looks like. Someone from the staff paid the Mexicans who gave the chomo Mexican orders to kill Tory.
Right now it's just ni99a talk and conspiracy though it looks real suspicious. State of California can't afford to have that scandal cause the bag Tory would get will be ENORMOUS.
This is a common mistake people make when defining hearsay evidence.
Hearsay in the context of legal proceedings is a statement made outside of court, with the purpose of getting someone to believe or act on the facts stated.
These statements are being made outside of court so it is hearsay evidence. In criminal proceedings, it is usually inadmissible and for good reason. The person making the statement doesn't carry with them the risk of perjury and they cannot be cross-examined.
I'm one of the fools who went hard in the paint defending Tory when he carried the presumption of innocence.
The jig is up. I'm not swayed by these sensational claims that a video exist that clears his name only to be followed up by someone who has had years to revise their story.