Spaceman Piff
Superstar
ok...so how many years does geno get then ? how many years/starts/reps does he need to prove/disprove something ?
those are all different situations altogether. eagles and pats clearly had better qbs behind them. panthers decided to grab a physical specimen in cam.
first, get chemistry in order. rex seems to split this team up. you NEED a glue coach, and at this point rex might be a lame duck.
second, you need to build the front 7. that defense is pathetic. get some receivers. the only rookie qb able to do anything without a good WRs lately was RGIII. a #1 WR goes a long way to establishing confidence.
you need to get a top 10 defense, especially run defense and pass rush established. secondary isnt as important, because nowadays it feeds off the front 7, and can be addressed after.
your oline is actually fine more or less in talent, its just I think they gave up. that goes back to the first point about chemistry and locker room unity.
oh and get rid of tebow for fukks sake
by the way, maybe youre not getting my point. I have nothing against the jets drafting geno in this draft, at that slot hes a good pick up even though Im not a believer. he shouldnt start yet until this team stops being a dysfunctional place.
there's no way of knowing without first seeing what geno's got. he hasn't even had a practice yet.
if he starts and he's gabbert status.. there's nothing wrong with drafting bridgewater next year. my point was that a second round pick doesn't bring nearly the commitment that a first round pick does. it's much easier to write it off as a flopped pick and move on.
it's different but not that different. this is probably vick's last year in philly. having foles didn't stop them from drafting barkley. regardless of whether cam is a "physical specimen," picking clausen the year before didn't stop them from taking a qb in the first the year after.
drafting geno doesn't prohibit them from picking bridgewater next year. that's all i'm saying. it doesn't mean they should draft a qb.. and it doesn't mean they shouldn't. it just means a 2nd round pick isn't a 1st round pick.
getting rid of rex isn't building the team. it's further throwing the team into instability. it's weird how when rex was winning, he was all the players favorite coaches.. the one everyone wanted to play for.. and now that he's hit a rough patch, he's this coach that divides players and teams.
let's be serious. winning solves all chemistry problems.
the defense is the key to drafting a qb now? first off, the d-line has been completely rebuilt in the past couple years. and the defense under rex will always be competitive. at NO point under rex has this defense been pathetic.
i agree that getting receivers would be nice. the jets have already come out and said tavon austin was at the top of their draft board. so you know they know that it's a need. that being said, holmes and kerley are both capable receivers. hill is raw but it's another example of the jets trying to get weapons.
i think everybody agrees that tebow needs to get the fukk out.
i get your point. i'm saying that he hasn't started yet.. and even if he did start, the jets's situation isn't as dire as it's made out to be. sanchez's play and holmes' absence last year made it look a lot worse than it is.
in general, the jets o-line and defense are up to par. ivory/goodson should be a huge upgrade over greene/mcknight/powell. i do think the jets need to get a wr but it's not like they don't have ANY talent in the wr corps.
this is most likely holmes' last year here so i'm thinking next year is when we really go after wrs.
I think we found some common ground. 
Of course, what type of question is that. Once in a gen QB's>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anyone else regardless of how good they are Day 1. A cornerstone QB guarantees you success for many years. A cornerstone DE assures you a solid at worse defense but not team success.
