You're arguing with Pats fans who read the reports every day about the Patriots, that on its face is strange because you're essentially saying your conjecture >>> our research.
there is no fukking conjecture. in your words, you're arguing someone whos passionate enough about football to watch tons of film as a hobby and have followed football for well over 20 years.
your first argument in my post you quoted was the dumb 'but look at everyone else throwing picks away'
Ive explained I wouldnt even trade a first rounder for established qb (and some qbs people consider 'top 10' qbs), much less a fukking backup
if pats think grap is brady's heir, they could do a lot of things, INCLUDING trading brady (which unlike trading a backup with two games for first+ rounders, has precedents that worked well enough), or franchising grap in 2018 effectively keeping him for two more years.
you saying grappopolo is 'clearly' better than, say, bradford, is also hilarious. grap started TWO NFL games, for one of the best franchises in the league. granted, it isnt too hard to be better than bradford, BUT to state that hes clearly better, Im sure you had to 'research' stuff, right ?
a lot of people were on that RGIII and Nick Foles shyt a few years back off a few games too.
team stans are always hilarious to debate with on here
at least that bucci dude doesnt hide the fact that he wants the picks pats will fleece someone for.
