Joe Rogan is Pissing Everyone off with his Anti Vax talk

Prodyson

All Star
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
4,009
Reputation
1,033
Daps
11,702
Well technically, Rogan’s is kinda right, but saying it wrong.
The vaccine doesn’t directly cause mutations. Mutations occur naturally by chance. However, the presence of the vaccine in the ecosystem will impact natural selection in the original virus and the mutations that are resistant to the vaccine will increase in the ecosystem as the numbers of transmission in the original virus decrease making the variant resistant strain become the dominant strain the ecosystem because the resistant ones still have the ability to be transmitted.

This is why there’s a new flu shot every year because viruses adapt to the environment just like organisms. Same thing with pesticides, that’s why they have to make stronger pesticides every couple years because the resistant “pests” become the dominant mutation and a new pesticide has to be created to combat the resistant pests. And so on and so forth.

Harsh to say, but If we just let everyone whose supposed to die, die through natural selection there would be no need for a vaccine and no emergence of a variant to then therefore need a stronger or booster vaccine . And the human population will be stronger as a whole because of it.
Eliminating the vaccine doesn’t completely eliminate mutations, even if your main point is accurate. There were mutations before a vaccine existed. And depending on how deadly these new strains become, you might end losing a much larger portion population than you’d like
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,252
Reputation
14,034
Daps
246,145
200_d.gif
I pick you up in my plane and decide I don't want it anymore and jump out with a parachute in mid air. It's my plane. I do what I want with it.

Abortion in a nutshell
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,091
Reppin
the ether
Wouldn't the virus linger longer with vaccines that are showing signs of being ineffective against mutations as opposed to the natural resistance you develop after catching and overcoming Covid which studies are showing are more effective against mutations?

Why do you just ignore the fact that for everyone to get the "natural immunity" requires millions to die first?

Unvaccinated people have to risk death to get your "better protection". For vaccinated people, best case scenario is that they're completely protected and worse case scenario is they get sick but almost certainly won't die and now they DO have the natural immunity on top of vaccine protection.

You're comparing the SECOND time that unvaccinated people get sick to the FIRST time that vaccinated people get sick while completely ignoring the consequences of that first illness in the unvaccinated.




Notice you're also ignoring the bottom of your own link:

Dr. William Hanage, an associate professor of epidemiology at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said that it is “impossible” to know whether the COVID vaccine or natural immunity is more protective against the virus due to the lack of knowledge regarding the level of protection natural immunity gives a person over time. Reinfection occurs in about 10% of people after having contracted the virus as a result of a decrease in immunity overtime.
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
20,740
Reputation
5,524
Daps
87,960
Reppin
North Jersey
Thread devolved into "nikka" saying Hitler had some good point, the pro-vac are white liberals and abortion is comparable to an infectious disease. Im glad I dont run into you ppl IRL, I'd be fighting everyday.

- im not going to adress the Hitler shyt:francis:
- even if that white liberal shytbis true, 4 billion ppl are vaccinated....did the liberals push their propaganda to places like Russia, UAE and Singapore??
- I actually approve of this take. Abortion are like diseases. And luke any disease, women should have the right to cure themselves of it:mjlit:>>>> I got in trouble on a college paper for this take. Its nice to see the world has caught up to me:mjgrin:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,105
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Troublesome said:

No......​

In today’s MMWR, a study of COVID-19 infections in Kentucky among people who were previously infected with SAR-CoV-2 shows that unvaccinated individuals are more than twice as likely to be reinfected with COVID-19 than those who were fully vaccinated after initially contracting the virus. These data further indicate that COVID-19 vaccines offer better protection than natural immunity alone and that vaccines, even after prior infection, help prevent reinfections.

......

The study of hundreds of Kentucky residents with previous infections through June 2021 found that those who were unvaccinated had 2.34 times the odds of reinfection compared with those who were fully vaccinated. The findings suggest that among people who have had COVID-19 previously, getting fully vaccinated provides additional protection against reinfection.

Additionally, a second publication from MMWR shows vaccines prevented COVID-19 related hospitalizations among the highest risk age groups. As cases, hospitalizations, and deaths rise,
the data in today’s MMWR reinforce that COVID-19 vaccines are the best way to prevent COVID-19.
 

Troublesome

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
5,050
Reputation
925
Daps
6,946
Reppin
NULL
No......​

In today’s MMWR, a study of COVID-19 infections in Kentucky among people who were previously infected with SAR-CoV-2 shows that unvaccinated individuals are more than twice as likely to be reinfected with COVID-19 than those who were fully vaccinated after initially contracting the virus. These data further indicate that COVID-19 vaccines offer better protection than natural immunity alone and that vaccines, even after prior infection, help prevent reinfections.

......

The study of hundreds of Kentucky residents with previous infections through June 2021 found that those who were unvaccinated had 2.34 times the odds of reinfection compared with those who were fully vaccinated. The findings suggest that among people who have had COVID-19 previously, getting fully vaccinated provides additional protection against reinfection.

Additionally, a second publication from MMWR shows vaccines prevented COVID-19 related hospitalizations among the highest risk age groups. As cases, hospitalizations, and deaths rise,
the data in today’s MMWR reinforce that COVID-19 vaccines are the best way to prevent COVID-19.
Thanks for posting. I hadn't come across this article. Curious why these studies are conflicting. Would like to know more about this. :salute:
 

B86

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,563
Reputation
1,965
Daps
46,994
Reppin
Da Burgh
Joe ain't forcing people to NOT take the vaccine. What's the big deal if he’s skeptical? We all gotta believe in the government that's not telling us the origin of the virus, but not listen to the man that has notes of Faucci lying to the public ?
I was just saying in another thread how Trump was recorded talking about the virus MONTHS before the public found out. Yet and still somehow people are still perfectly okay with their logic that the government isn't hiding anything and that everything is all good with these vaccines...

History books; lied to. Going to war for "weapons of mass destruction"; lied to. Virus spreading through the world but nobody knows until months later; lied to. Vaccines come out and nikkas say everything is all good? How fukkin retarded do people have to be?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,105
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Troublesome said:
Thanks for posting. I hadn't come across this article. Curious why these studies are conflicting. Would like to know more about this. :salute:

They don't conflict. As far as I can determine, Dr. Makary's primary concern is vaccinating children so his data focuses on a smaller group within the population. The other studies focus on the population in-general.​
 

Troublesome

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
5,050
Reputation
925
Daps
6,946
Reppin
NULL
Why do you just ignore the fact that for everyone to get the "natural immunity" requires millions to die first?

Unvaccinated people have to risk death to get your "better protection". For vaccinated people, best case scenario is that they're completely protected and worse case scenario is they get sick but almost certainly won't die and now they DO have the natural immunity on top of vaccine protection.

You're comparing the SECOND time that unvaccinated people get sick to the FIRST time that vaccinated people get sick while completely ignoring the consequences of that first illness in the unvaccinated.




Notice you're also ignoring the bottom of your own link:

Dr. William Hanage, an associate professor of epidemiology at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said that it is “impossible” to know whether the COVID vaccine or natural immunity is more protective against the virus due to the lack of knowledge regarding the level of protection natural immunity gives a person over time. Reinfection occurs in about 10% of people after having contracted the virus as a result of a decrease in immunity overtime.

The bottom of the link was information from a differnt doctor. Doesn't make it wrong, just means that doctor doesn't feel comfortable enough to say one way is better than the other (which is understandable).

Also, I'm not ignoring the fact that people will die. Imo, that's the unfortunate result of going through a pandemic. My concern with relying on vaccines means there will always be a segment of the population that will be unvaccinated and will be at risk for spreading the virus and enabling mutations (underage kids, people who don't have the means to keep up with boosters).
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,105
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
B86 said:
I was just saying in another thread how Trump was recorded talking about the virus MONTHS before the public found out. Yet and still somehow people are still perfectly okay with their logic that the government isn't hiding anything and that everything is all good with these vaccines...

If there was 'something up' with the vaccines, why were "The Elites" getting it first? As far as the Government being capable of hiding something of that magnitude, consider that Bill Clinton couldn't even get a blowjob without the whole world knowing. That was just 2 people. More people involved in a cover-up = less likely to remain secret.​
 

Won Won

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
14,829
Reputation
3,750
Daps
48,544
Well technically, Rogan’s is kinda right, but saying it wrong.
The vaccine doesn’t directly cause mutations. Mutations occur naturally by chance. However, the presence of the vaccine in the ecosystem will impact natural selection in the original virus and the mutations that are resistant to the vaccine will increase in the ecosystem as the numbers of transmission in the original virus decrease making the variant resistant strain become the dominant strain the ecosystem because the resistant ones still have the ability to be transmitted.

This is why there’s a new flu shot every year because viruses adapt to the environment just like organisms. Same thing with pesticides, that’s why they have to make stronger pesticides every couple years because the resistant “pests” become the dominant mutation and a new pesticide has to be created to combat the resistant pests. And so on and so forth.

Harsh to say, but If we just let everyone whose supposed to die, die through natural selection there would be no need for a vaccine and no emergence of a variant to then therefore need a stronger or booster vaccine . And the human population will be stronger as a whole because of it.

Remember when the anti-vax crew was very concerned about people dying for about a week because it was used as a “gotcha” for those that are pro-vax? :mjlol:

Went from “Covid deaths are just old people, who cares?” to “why are liberals happy with people dying?” and all the way back to “natural selection, let people die for the betterment of society”

:deadmanny:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,105
Daps
122,386
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Troublesome said:
Also, I'm not ignoring the fact that people will die. Imo, that's the unfortunate result of going through a pandemic. My concern with relying on vaccines means there will always be a segment of the population that will be unvaccinated and will be at risk for spreading the virus and enabling mutations (underage kids, people who don't have the means to keep up with boosters).

Breh, human diversity, by itself, prevents ALL medication from being 100% effective/safe for 100% of the population. You can only protect the largest amount of people you can while causing the least harm.

Vaccines do that exceptionally well.​
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
28,700
Reputation
9,732
Daps
123,448
If there was 'something up' with the vaccines, why were "The Elites" getting it first? As far as the Government being capable of hiding something of that magnitude, consider that Bill Clinton couldn't even get a blowjob without the whole world knowing. That was just 2 people. More people involved in a cover-up = less likely to remain secret.​



Sheeit

Being a whistle blower against Pfizer or Moderna right now after all of their sales would have your whole bloodline set for generations
 
Top