Joey Galloway talks James Winston on First Take

Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
24,795
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
19,006
supposedly he admits to not watching college football but he's got like 10 posts in here giving strong takes on college football

:ohlawd:

Nope, just giving strong takes on 18 interceptions and being a dumb ass off the field.

I don't need to watch the game to know 18 college interceptions and a few sexual assault accusations and stealing from a grocery store ain't something worth the #1 overall pick

Just cause you might be the best QB, don't make you the top pick either
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
24,795
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
19,006
The media never called him Raplisberger. What does that mean in context of media railing of Winston? :dahell:

Did I miss it, or does the media have a rape themed nickname for Winston?

Nah, it doesn't.

And Ben was railed too, but that's something that dudes just love to pretend to happen, cause it doesn't fit their "narrative"
 

Pesci

Architect
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
3,494
Reputation
-685
Daps
8,875
Nope, just giving strong takes on 18 interceptions and being a dumb ass off the field.

I don't need to watch the game to know 18 college interceptions and a few sexual assault accusations and stealing from a grocery store ain't something worth the #1 overall pick

Just cause you might be the best QB, don't make you the top pick either
that seems like a pretty lame way to draw a conclusion, but do what you want i guess
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,746
Reputation
11,580
Daps
241,730
Did I miss it, or does the media have a rape themed nickname for Winston?

Nah, it doesn't.

And Ben was railed too, but that's something that dudes just love to pretend to happen, cause it doesn't fit their "narrative"

Sorry...but the media took a wait and see all the facts first approach to Big Ben. ESPN ordered their reporters to stand down and not to cover the story when the "allegations" first surfaced

It was actually argued that he was being too protected.

So let's not act like the narrative was the same. White privilege gave him the "let's wait before air this" approach.

Nuance and context seems not to be your thing when trolling
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
24,795
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
19,006
that seems like a pretty lame way to draw a conclusion, but do what you want i guess

It's based off historical knowledge.

Honestly, how many QB's in the NFL succeed with a lotta shyt on their plate off the field.

It's the same reason I thought Johnny was gonna flop super bad, but Johnny was a midget who played like a goof so he had no chance.

But I think Jameis has a much better shot at being a good pro than Johnny does, all i`m simply saying is he seems like a risk and I don't think the reward is that spectacular, so it's definitely not worth taking 1st.

Think about how many times a team reaches on a QB at #1 and pass up on potential legends just cause that guy plays the QB spot.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
24,795
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
19,006
Sorry...but the media took a wait and see all the facts first approach to Big Ben. ESPN ordered their reporters not to cover the story.

It was actually argued that he was being too protected.

So let's not act like the narrative was the same. White privilege gave him the "let's wait before air this" approach.

Nuance and context seems not to be your thing when trolling

You got selective memory. You're just like everyone with that BS, you remember what you want to.

Also, E!spn is one media source, so stating that is goofy, because there are a whole bunch of other news outlets that ripped him.

And to top it off, Ben actually lost money, sponsorships and games because of his sexual assault allegations, what has Jameis lost?
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,746
Reputation
11,580
Daps
241,730
You got selective memory. You're just like everyone with that BS, you remember what you want to.

Also, E!spn is one media source, so stating that is goofy, because there are a whole bunch of other news outlets that ripped him.

And to top it off, Ben actually lost money, sponsorships and games because of his sexual assault allegations, what has Jameis lost?


This isn't selective memory. This was even said by Francesa DURING the midst of their silence.

My point is that the silence existed which makes the Winston story, a college kid, different. They ran with it...no waiting.

It took everyone questioning their actions before ESPN reported the Big Ben story. ESPN hasn't had a problem in reporting stories since.

Get personal and cry about my character now. :heh:
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,124
Reputation
12,250
Daps
204,944


This isn't selective memory. This was even said by Francesa DURING the midst of their silence.

My point is that the silence existed which makes the Winston story, a college kid, different. They ran with it...no waiting.

It took everyone questioning their actions before ESPN reported the Big Ben story. ESPN hasn't had a problem in reporting stories since.

Get personal and cry about my character now. :heh:


Exactly man. You had the big lead, profootballtalk, and deadspin calling out ESPN. But let's not play dumb....ESPN is the 400 pound guerilla in sports. They make the news period and everyone piggy backs off of them. I think I read somewhere that ESPN is like a 16 billion dollar a year company for Disney.

Also here in Dallas Dale Hansen who is a famous tv guy in sports. Dude is up there with Randy Galloway here in Dallas. Anyway he had a radio show when the Big Ben mess broke. Now remember this was his second incident because ESPN never reported the first one.

Well the ESPN headquarters told Dale Hansen to not talk about Big Ben during his radio show. Dale being the stubborn old man he is did a silent protest and didn't even have the show. He set in the studio with a sign saying ESPN will not let me talk about Big Ben. After his show was over he resigned on the spot.

Then the next day on tv when he was doing his nightly sports news broadcast. Dale tells everyone why he quit, why it was wrong that ESPN refused to address the big Ben sexual assault allegations and how was it big Ben was being protected when black cowboys players in the 90s such as Mike Irvin wasn't given the same protection as Ben....you know to get all the facts straight.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,746
Reputation
11,580
Daps
241,730
Exactly man. You had the big lead, profootballtalk, and deadspin calling out ESPN. But let's not play dumb....ESPN is the 400 pound guerilla in sports. They make the news period and everyone piggy backs off of them. I think I read somewhere that ESPN is like a 16 billion dollar a year company for Disney.

Also here in Dallas Dale Hansen who is a famous tv guy in sports. Dude is up there with Randy Galloway here in Dallas. Anyway he had a radio show when the Big Ben mess broke. Now remember this was his second incident because ESPN never reported the first one.

Well the ESPN headquarters told Dale Hansen to not talk about Big Ben during his radio show. Dale being the stubborn old man he is did a silent protest and didn't even have the show. He set in the studio with a sign saying ESPN will not let me talk about Big Ben. After his show was over he resigned on the spot.

Then the next day on tv when he was doing his nightly sports news broadcast. Dale tells everyone why he quit, why it was wrong that ESPN refused to address the big Ben sexual assault allegations and how was it big Ben was being protected when black cowboys players in the 90s such as Mike Irvin wasn't given the same protection as Ben....you know to get all the facts straight.
Exactly.

dudes like @LastEmperor2k2 are hilarious. They're so amped to tell you the end result being the same shouting "yeah!! 2+2 DOES equal 4!! You can't argue that!!" When we are saying the clear difference is in the 3+1 that we see which got us here.

Hilarious...
 
Last edited:

Jax

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
36,634
Reputation
3,851
Daps
54,860
Reppin
#Targset,#Heatgang,#Byrdgang
What is so funny is if it was another type of person :usure:then justice would have been considered served. These are the same people who are supposedly objective to the Zimmerman and co being tried and set free according to their precious Justice System. Soon as a brother, O.J. or Jameis, is exonerated then it is a fallacy in it. Keep your eyes open. :sas2:
THIS
 
Top