No you don't![]()
I'm a Jet fan so you know that's a lie but ya'll pick before us. I don't think Tampa let's him fall.
No you don't![]()
supposedly he admits to not watching college football but he's got like 10 posts in here giving strong takes on college footballfukking troll and got damn ignorant. That is what he is.

The media never called him Raplisberger. What does that mean in context of media railing of Winston?Y'all have all this sympathy for Jameis but Ben R will always be "Rapelisberger" to you even though he, too, was never charged nor convicted

Didn't he pay those chicks off, though?The media never called him Raplisberger. What does that mean in context of media railing of Winston?![]()

supposedly he admits to not watching college football but he's got like 10 posts in here giving strong takes on college football
![]()
The media never called him Raplisberger. What does that mean in context of media railing of Winston?![]()
that seems like a pretty lame way to draw a conclusion, but do what you want i guessNope, just giving strong takes on 18 interceptions and being a dumb ass off the field.
I don't need to watch the game to know 18 college interceptions and a few sexual assault accusations and stealing from a grocery store ain't something worth the #1 overall pick
Just cause you might be the best QB, don't make you the top pick either
Did I miss it, or does the media have a rape themed nickname for Winston?
Nah, it doesn't.
And Ben was railed too, but that's something that dudes just love to pretend to happen, cause it doesn't fit their "narrative"
that seems like a pretty lame way to draw a conclusion, but do what you want i guess
Sorry...but the media took a wait and see all the facts first approach to Big Ben. ESPN ordered their reporters not to cover the story.
It was actually argued that he was being too protected.
So let's not act like the narrative was the same. White privilege gave him the "let's wait before air this" approach.
Nuance and context seems not to be your thing when trolling
You got selective memory. You're just like everyone with that BS, you remember what you want to.
Also, E!spn is one media source, so stating that is goofy, because there are a whole bunch of other news outlets that ripped him.
And to top it off, Ben actually lost money, sponsorships and games because of his sexual assault allegations, what has Jameis lost?

Galloway for keeping it real, and
to the brotha wearing the black lives matter hoodie today's show as well.
This isn't selective memory. This was even said by Francesa DURING the midst of their silence.
My point is that the silence existed which makes the Winston story, a college kid, different. They ran with it...no waiting.
It took everyone questioning their actions before ESPN reported the Big Ben story. ESPN hasn't had a problem in reporting stories since.
Get personal and cry about my character now.![]()
Exactly.Exactly man. You had the big lead, profootballtalk, and deadspin calling out ESPN. But let's not play dumb....ESPN is the 400 pound guerilla in sports. They make the news period and everyone piggy backs off of them. I think I read somewhere that ESPN is like a 16 billion dollar a year company for Disney.
Also here in Dallas Dale Hansen who is a famous tv guy in sports. Dude is up there with Randy Galloway here in Dallas. Anyway he had a radio show when the Big Ben mess broke. Now remember this was his second incident because ESPN never reported the first one.
Well the ESPN headquarters told Dale Hansen to not talk about Big Ben during his radio show. Dale being the stubborn old man he is did a silent protest and didn't even have the show. He set in the studio with a sign saying ESPN will not let me talk about Big Ben. After his show was over he resigned on the spot.
Then the next day on tv when he was doing his nightly sports news broadcast. Dale tells everyone why he quit, why it was wrong that ESPN refused to address the big Ben sexual assault allegations and how was it big Ben was being protected when black cowboys players in the 90s such as Mike Irvin wasn't given the same protection as Ben....you know to get all the facts straight.
THISWhat is so funny is if it was another type of personthen justice would have been considered served. These are the same people who are supposedly objective to the Zimmerman and co being tried and set free according to their precious Justice System. Soon as a brother, O.J. or Jameis, is exonerated then it is a fallacy in it. Keep your eyes open.
![]()