the artist known az
Hail the victors
Joe Brown can suck a dikk
Judge Joe Brown says Rittenhouse was acting in Self Defense.
- Thread starter ViShawn
- Start date
shyttenhouse created the danger he can’t claim self defense if he provided the situation from the start
Trust Me
Coli Prophet
Godless Socialist CEO
Superstar
Bruh, I've been accused of being a c00n or an agent for supporting things like universal healthcare and free college. We got dudes on here OPENLY supporting white supremacists and not a peep for that crowd. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Field Marshall Bradley
Veteran
People in here defending Rittenhouse?
Nope…. Only saying he is going to walk because of the evidence or lack thereof anything conclusive
Trust Me
Coli Prophet
Bruh, I've been accused of being a c00n or an agent for supporting things like universal healthcare and free college. We got dudes on here OPENLY supporting white supremacists and not a peep for that crowd. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
What if I were to tell you.. you were in Pleasantville, and not Atlanta/Miami/Louisiana etc?
Ehhhh not exactly. Read up on the self-defense law in Wisconsin and you'll see the ambiguity of that particular law that might help him walk.
Field Marshall Bradley
Veteran
Bruh, I've been accused of being a c00n or an agent for supporting things like universal healthcare and free college. We got dudes on here OPENLY supporting white supremacists and not a peep for that crowd. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
No nikka accused you of being an agent/c00n for being pro any of those things you just mentioned
He wasn’t acting in self defense.
richaveli83
Veteran
That devil had no business being there in the first place. The fukk you doing going to a protest carrying a AR and not expect some hostility?!
saturn7
Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
It will be difficult for A because they were in commission of a crime (drug dealing) while using the weapon.
They would still make the self-defense case but I think they would get charged and convicted for something.
And all of this from the personal responsibility "selfish" crowd.
No matter how much you want to hate the dude and why he showed up in the first place, legally he is right.
Just because the justice system is unfair, doesn't mean the solution is to perpetuate and ingrain the unfairness of the system further. The goal is to remove it in the first place and people who "think" with their emotions don't realize they are making the situation worse for everyone by perpetuating it themselves. If there is no one arguing against the injustice consistently then that is as good as solidifying the injustice of the system itself because you've also started to buy into it. This means even if you despise the person, you should want to see the justice system operate as impartially and fairly in all cases in order to justify why in the cases its someone you emotionally feel is more deserving can be put in contrast to an example of a fair judgment and therefore increasing the chances of successfully arguing their just treatment as well. Once you cede the ground on that, it's over.
The fact of the matter is that the video and evidence shows that they attacked him first and in that case its self defense. It is what it is. Doesn't matter he crossed state lines or open carried. His right to self defense supersedes all that. Which should be the same for everyone.
You don't want to create a precedence where defending yourself is a criminal act. When you have one of the dudes shot saying "yeah... He shot me after I pointed my gun at him" then it's kind of clear what happen. The video also shows the other two dudes attacked him first.
Just because the justice system is unfair, doesn't mean the solution is to perpetuate and ingrain the unfairness of the system further. The goal is to remove it in the first place and people who "think" with their emotions don't realize they are making the situation worse for everyone by perpetuating it themselves. If there is no one arguing against the injustice consistently then that is as good as solidifying the injustice of the system itself because you've also started to buy into it. This means even if you despise the person, you should want to see the justice system operate as impartially and fairly in all cases in order to justify why in the cases its someone you emotionally feel is more deserving can be put in contrast to an example of a fair judgment and therefore increasing the chances of successfully arguing their just treatment as well. Once you cede the ground on that, it's over.
The fact of the matter is that the video and evidence shows that they attacked him first and in that case its self defense. It is what it is. Doesn't matter he crossed state lines or open carried. His right to self defense supersedes all that. Which should be the same for everyone.
You don't want to create a precedence where defending yourself is a criminal act. When you have one of the dudes shot saying "yeah... He shot me after I pointed my gun at him" then it's kind of clear what happen. The video also shows the other two dudes attacked him first.
Last edited:
Trust Me
Coli Prophet
1) he was threatening to shoot them from the second he stepped out of his Mom’s car. Dude baited them.
2) Crossing state lines illegally, with a firearm.. combined with the screen shots of him offering his ‘services’ while being armed is textbook intent. And the carrying is a separate charge.
There really isn’t any way you (or anyone) can try to flip this. There really isn’t. But do you.
