Just click this thread
- Thread starter Berniewood Hogan
- Start date
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Trumpset before the election: 
"It's rigged! It's rigged! It's highly illegitimate!"
Trumpset after the election:
"Let's not question the legitimacy of the election."
"It's rigged! It's rigged! It's highly illegitimate!"Trumpset after the election:
"Let's not question the legitimacy of the election."
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
"The FBI disagrees with the CIA."
"Actually, the FBI now agrees with the CIA.""Doesn't matter, cucks, MAGA."
Trumpset before the election:
Trumpset after the election:
Hilltrons before the election "those emails won't do anything to effect Clinton"
Hilltrons after the election " Russia Russia Russia Russia
"
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
The White House accused Russia of trying to mess with our election in October. As usual, Trumpset can't post without lying.Hilltrons before the election "those emails won't do anything to effect Clinton"
Hilltrons after the election " Russia Russia Russia Russia
In my mind, Alex Jones dismissing something as a baseless conspiracy theory almost confirms that the "conspiracy theory" is true.
Never thought I'd see the day that a whack job like him would be defending the president.
Not sure where the joke is at....
James Clapper, who heads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which oversees all 17 intellligence agencies says there is no substantial evidence of a Russian and Wikileak connection .
If you don't mind me quoting myself:
Seeing that the investigation is still in process, this is not enough to conclude that there is therefore no link between Russian hacking attempts and the Wikileaks dump. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
His quote was "as far as the Wikileaks connection, the evidence there is not as strong, and we don't have good insight in to the sequencing of the releases, when that data was provided".
This quote was not to be taken as a conclusive statement to say that there is "no substantial evidence of a Russian and Wikileak connection".
I read his statement to be that the evidence is inconclusive, not that there isn't any evidence to support that assertion. But I guess you can read into that whatever you'd like to be true.