Just Striaght AADOS Men Flashin Out On a Racist CAC to Protect BW Again

Houston911

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,003
Reputation
14,036
Daps
199,445
the point that you're missing is that the way you highlighting the fact that the white parent isn't ADOS, this holds true for ADOS who have 1 NON-ADOS BLACK parent, too

NON-ADOS blacks weren't out in those fields with ADOS' ancestors, that means people like

nipsey_vp_0.jpg




would only get half, using your logic:mjgrin:

yea you stupid ass nicca, I already said that

If reparations is about slavery, why would you get paid for some people that weren’t here during slavery?

On what planet does that make sense :what:

I’m convinced you’re either mixed (which is cool) or a future Caucasian (which is also cool)

I refuse to believe you are really this stupid. It’s gotta be an agenda talking.
 

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,426
Reputation
6,296
Daps
140,272
you have got to be the dumbest person on the Internet

if I have 2 parents who descend from slaves

and someone else has one parent who descend from slaves

why would we be entitled to an equal amount?

:what:
You have been getting whipped in this thread and in the other one you made by me, Illmatic, Supper and everyone else in here as well as being exposed of you saying your a ghanian.
Its embarassing that we have you as a Supermod running this forum. Because you argue, debate, and have logic like a troll with to much time on his hands

equal amount because being a ADOS person with the lineage, and going through black experiences it dont mattter if you have one ADOS parent or two you are owed reparations its that simple due to the experiences and how you are viewed in society

espescially as the argument for reparations takes into part the racism and discrimination we go through today in society.
 
Last edited:

Houston911

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,003
Reputation
14,036
Daps
199,445
You have been getting whipped in this thread and in the other one you made by me, Illmatic, Supper and everyone else in here as well as being exposed of you saying your a ghanian.
Its embarassing that we have you as a Supermod running this forum. Because you argue, debate, and have logic like a troll with to much time on his hands

equal amount because being a ADOS person with the lineage, and going through black experiences it dont mattter if you have one ADOS parent or two you are owed reparations its that simple

espescially as the argument for reparations takes into part the racism and discrimination we go through today in society.

suck my dikk
 

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,426
Reputation
6,296
Daps
140,272
It's so disappointing to see a thread about Black men showing strength has turned into nonsense about who is and is not African-American. Now instead of us using this thread as a mechanism to uplift one another and understand our unity, it is used to destroy our unity.

Everyone that contributed to this going off the rails should be ashamed of themselves.
its the usual cornball extremeist. Nonados intruders, Biter Jealous ass Women, and fake ass armchair over the top dikkwatching Militants

the usuals you see in this thread, instead of enjoying seeing this good news. We got some bytch ass nikkas and bytches you done sidetracked this thread and they all fall under the categories I mentioned^^^
 

seabreeze80

All Star
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
3,608
Reputation
565
Daps
11,193
Okay. You got it. So then what do we call a child with two biracial parents? Do we call them "quadracial"? You see how silly it can get. It's better to keep shyt simple.

I will admit this is where it gets tricky because this is how MGM came into existence. There are many MGM in my family. My grandparents are MGM. However, that is still different from having an entire white parent.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Ya?

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,426
Reputation
6,296
Daps
140,272
suck my dikk
Yep just like I said
You have been getting whipped in this thread and in the other one you made by me, Illmatic, Supper and everyone else in here as well as being exposed of you saying your a ghanian.
Its embarassing that we have you as a Supermod running this forum. Because you argue, debate, and have logic like a troll with to much time on his hands

.


we need to get some new mods on this site, not have you brain dead idiots
 
Last edited:

Houston911

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,003
Reputation
14,036
Daps
199,445
Yep just like I said



we need to get some new mods on this site, not brain dead idiots

You 2 dummies co-signing each other means nothing

Just like the dude with the Malcolm x avi. If you don’t think someone with 2 black parents deserves more than someone with one, you either have an agenda or you’re just flat out stupid
 

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,426
Reputation
6,296
Daps
140,272
I knew that's how it was gonna go down when I saw the OP's name. These nikkas don't have nearly as much smoke as they do towards the real enemy like they do other black folks. Probably 'PAWG' lovers and all.
your literally one of the nikkas that helped sidetrack this thread so foh:camby:
Stupid for calling someone with a white parent, biracial? Sir, you are the stupid one.


Twisting my argument and yours up wont help you. You do realize I can just go back to the post right? Lol im talking about biracials that identify as black, if someone is mixed and wants to seperate from the communnity let them walk that route

That is not what you and me are arguing about here, so quit the shyt
There was a mini movement with biracials distancing themselves from blacks a little over a decade ago. They were demanding their own classification and many still do.
yeah a "Mini movement" which was a small section and period of time of biracials that dont reflect the overall mass of them. There are mixed that be on that type of shyt. Those we dont care about or consider apart of us. Those that identify which alot do, they cool and can be and are apart of the community.

Just like we got divesting and swirling Black women who out here trying to start a "mini movement" to seperate from the Black community and swirl.

So we gonna start generalizing and doing vague brushes on people based on "mini movements" now? because that same method can be used on "monoracial " BW dont think yall dont got shyt that stink:sas2:
 
Last edited:

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,426
Reputation
6,296
Daps
140,272
I was just about to neg this bitter ass hater. The epitome of a disingenuous shyt poster. She needs to go back to LSA with the garbage that she's spewing.
talk all this "they aint black biracial blah blah" shyt but gon sit here and having a history of dating eses

this is why people with this "purity" talk espescially by women cannot be taken serious. Almost all the chicks, that talk like this always expose themsleves of who they are.

A complete joke, question someone with a ados parent of being black, but have a history of dating Eduardos brehettes:lolbron:
 
Last edited:

Emoryal

Superstar
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,212
Reputation
315
Daps
19,163
Okay? And even still the dominant view by the scientific community is that biological "races" don't exist. So, whether you're appealing to it's origins or it's current consensus view race is not based in biology, but a social construct. If you attempted to shape racial taxonomy to fit biological realities you'd end up with a system completely not reminiscent of what we all know as race at all. "Blacks" and "whites" simply wouldn't exist in this racial taxon. People of Sub saharan african descent ALONE would be entirely too diverse genetically to fit into an all inclusive category that doesn't include damn near the rest of the human race.



Yeah no. What you can do it use dna to determine which part of the world and/or which people groups they genetically cluster with. And then extrapolate "race" using western classification systems which are arbitrarily assigned due to PHENOTYPE, not genetics, of what race these distinct people groups and/or natives from those parts of the world belong to(which has been subject to change many times and there's actually still no general consensus on for many of them even among race realist, who are themselves fringe in the science community). But these different people groups being assigned to these races aren't necessarily based in any biology at all but perceived phenotype, even though the individuals themselves being assigned to the people groups is. For instance you could use dna to determine that Illhan Omar's genetic profile clusters with that of the horn of Africa's somali population, but Somali people's collective genetic profile would show much more affinity to that of non-black north africans, middle easterners and southern europeans than to us AADOS, yet we're all "black" according to you. Tell me, what is the biological basis for AADOS and Somalis being apart of the same racial group?

Don't even get me started on people groups who aren't even of recent SSA ancestry like Andaman Islanders, Filipino Aetas, Papuans, and Australia Aboriginals, but are considered to be "racially black".



Actually *WE* do claim people who are from our community that are phenotypically what most consider "white" as one of our own and that has been the "tragic"/romantic story of all throughout OUR history.

This man is ethnically AADOS.

willie-bryant-0be3c997-eabd-4652-8233-62bcafa786f-resize-750.jpeg




So is this man.

15461470_116056762700.jpg





So is this man

ERockNewman_000.jpg



GSxw0d4.gif



Ain't shyt arbitrary about it, because they fit the definition of being aados in every way. They're the descendants of chattel slaves from the contiguous US(or what is today such), part of the community, are practice aados culture, and come from families that carry black ethnic identity.

And blackness is an essential part of AADOS identity. You can't separate the two. So, anyone who is AADOS carries black ethnic identity with them.

And no one from OUR community has ever questioned their blackness ethnically speaking. It's only non-ados outsiders who don't know anything about our history or culture, but want to co opt our identity and struggle for themseves that try to come in and tell us who is and isn't part of our ethnicity.




And here we go again with you outsiders trying to place so much emphasis on how OTHER PEOPLE VIEW US, instead of how we view ourselves and how we function within our own community, as if we should just allow ourselves to be defined based on how outsiders view us(you'd like that wouldn't you).

And even that point is flimsy at best. White Americans may identity a haitian, nigerian, jamaican or w/e as "black" upon first sight, but once they begin to interact with them they quickly become "ethnic" in their minds, completely distinct from actual black americans. Otherwise you wouldn't have concepts like model minorities. Studies show West Indians and Africans themselves report lower rates of racism from non-blacks in the work force than AADOS. Our experiences and even other people's "racial" perception of us in the US is not the same.

This is something African's have always known as well.


Black African immigrants, race and police brutality in America

^^^^You're telling me they just see us all as "fellow blacks", though right?
Firstly, you're arguing against yourself again. What we describe as black in the U.S isn't a complex web of haplotypes it's being descended from the original indigenous people of certain regions. Your "yeah no" statement is tantamount to me saying "we can't completely identify who your parents are we can only check to see if your dna matches there's". Of course tracing the clustering of you genes and ancestry is how you determine someone's race what do you think we use the word race to describe? And none of those groups are mentioned to be "racially black" by anyone other than hoteps online. And of course if you allow the criteria to be AADOS to encompass a time when legally any arbitrary amount black ancestry made you black by law in some states you will get white people being AADOS. One drop rule has been repealed in every state it existed. And if you're making up definitions to allow race not to be a factor of being ADOS of course their going to fit YOUR CRITERIA. And this homogeneous monolithic thought that no ADOS questions whether they are black not blackness is a lie to push an agenda because several of us ADOS are doing it right now. Your last paragrap is hilariously stupid. You could literally make the same argument for anyone that doens't the stereotypical mold of what they consider "black". The link you posted spoke about the differences between how wealthy Africa immigrants are treated and poor ones. You realize their are differnce in systemic racism to how black men are treated and black women are does that now invalidate them being black? How about the differences between how black gays are treated in the work force? Does invalidate their claim to being ADOS?
 

Houston911

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,003
Reputation
14,036
Daps
199,445
Firstly, you're arguing against yourself again. What we describe as black in the U.S isn't a complex web of haplotypes it's being descended from the original indigenous people of certain regions. Your "yeah no" statement is tantamount to me saying "we can't completely identify who your parents are we can only check to see if your dna matches there's". Of course tracing the clustering of you genes and ancestry is how you determine someone's race what do you think we use the word race to describe? And none of those groups are mentioned to be "racially black" by anyone other than hoteps online. And of course if you allow the criteria to be AADOS to encompass a time when legally any arbitrary amount black ancestry made you black by law in some states you will get white people being AADOS. One drop rule has been repealed in every state it existed. And if you're making up definitions to allow race not to be a factor of being ADOS of course their going to fit YOUR CRITERIA. And this homogeneous monolithic thought that no ADOS questions whether they are black not blackness is a lie to push an agenda because several of us ADOS are doing it right now. Your last paragrap is hilariously stupid. You could literally make the same argument for anyone that doens't the stereotypical mold of what they consider "black". The link you posted spoke about the differences between how wealthy Africa immigrants are treated and poor ones. You realize their are differnce in systemic racism to how black men are treated and black women are does that now invalidate them being black? How about the differences between how black gays are treated in the work force? Does invalidate their claim to being ADOS?

:salute:

good to see someone with some common sense

“And of course if you allow the criteria to be AADOS to encompass a time when legally any arbitrary amount black ancestry made you black by law in some states you will get white people being AADOS.”
 

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,426
Reputation
6,296
Daps
140,272
solace in this is knowing that despite how this forum is littered with pea brain people. None of yall's opinion seriously affects and influences ADOS:wow:

just idiots talking and yelling in this echo chamber of a forum
 

seabreeze80

All Star
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
3,608
Reputation
565
Daps
11,193
your literally one of the nikkas that helped sidetrack this thread so foh:camby:

Twisting my argument and yours up wont help you. You do realize I can just go back to the post right? Lol im talking about biracials that identify as black, if someone is mixed and wants to seperate from the communnity let them walk that route

That is not what you and me are arguing about here, so quit the shyt

yeah a "Mini movement" which was a small section and period of time of biracials that dont reflect the overall mass of them. There are mixed that be on that type of shyt. Those we dont care about or consider apart of us. Those that identify which alot do, they cool and can be and are apart of the community.

Just like we got divesting and swirling Black women who out here trying to start a "mini movement" to seperate from the Black community and swirl.

So we gonna start generalizing and doing vague brushes on people based on "mini movements" now? because that same method can be used on "monoracial " BW dont think yall dont got shyt that stink:sas2:
I literally have no idea what you are babbling about here.

Most biracials identify as biracial or mixed. Just because a few are "cool" as you put it does not mean that they do not have a white parent. Its simple biology. 1 white + 1 black = biracial. I'm sorry you can't accept that. They are not the same as you. They are equal to you but not the same. I have 3 biracial siblings and fully identify as biracial as they should. Just because they are in my family does not give me the right to claim them as black only. If they were to choose to claim black when they are older, that is their prerogative but it does not erase their white parent.
 
Top