Silver Surfer
Veteran
That's not true....the families said Mike had the kids in their room....they were in adjoining rooms
Just thought I would put folks on blast who came after MJ
- Thread starter GodsPerspective
- Start date
That's not true....the families said Mike had the kids in their room....they were in adjoining rooms
It is true. The "families" as you say that accused him of sleeping overnight with the kids, don't exist.
Nobody accused him in court of sleeping in the same bed as children. If so post the receipts.
Silver Surfer
Veteran
So to be clear Mike never had sleepovers with the kids where the parents were not present?
1) Deepak Chopra's son wrote an article about his experience hanging out with michael jackson as a teenager, he said he would chill and hang out w/mike in hotel rooms on tour (sick shyt right?)
he said he would get bored and would want to hang out w/his friends (they were there too) and get up on some females - he said mike would encourage them to. Mike use to just sit there and do nothing, he had no social life or life at all outside of the studio or on stage. <<< look this up.
2) Michael Jackson would befriend entire families - the mothers, sisters, brothers, husbands...whole families.
wade, safechuck, jordy chandler, arizo - all of their parents knew mike too
the media downplays this because it doesn't fit their narrative of MJ being a boy hungry pedophile. <<< look this up.
the truth is a lot of you dudes NEED michael jackson to be a pedophile for misdirection...no different than the overly homophobic republican politician or preacher that's secretly gay.
the reason dudes (and it's only MEN let's keep it 100) still go in on mike on and offline like this is because they ARE touching children, or they have in the past.
they need that mount rushmore type figure that everybody knows so nobody will think anything of them: "what!? he always going in on pedos! he ain't one!! I don't believe that!"
Last edited:
100% unproven that he slept in the same bed with children where the parents were not present, yes.
these dudes want to believe that mike would go down to walgreens to scout little boys or pick kids up out of his concerts and bring them back to his house
lock the doors from the entire staff and security, they'd better not say shyt either, yeah they were in on it too
then pay the parents to just leave and go home and that mike would bring them back later. don't let the gate hit you on the way out.
there are really full grown ass adults out here that seriously believe it went down like this.
exactly it don't even make sense that way too.these dudes want to believe that mike would go down to walgreens to scout little boys or pick kids up out of his concerts and bring them back to his house
lock the doors from the entire staff and security, they'd better not say shyt either, yeah they were in on it too
then pay the parents to just leave and go home and that mike would bring them back later. don't let the gate hit you on the way out.
there are really full grown ass adults out here that seriously believe it went down like this.
They want us to believe the dude had a bedroom that was off limits to only him and whatever child he was allegedly deflowering. Security, parents be damned.
"Oh but he had a weird alarm system!
"Yeah that alarm system was put into place because a crazy fan had snuck in and hid in his closet for days one time only sneaking out at night to get food or use the bathroom.
exactly it don't even make sense that way too.
They want us to believe the dude had a bedroom that was off limits to only him and whatever child he was allegedly deflowering. Security, parents be damned.
"Oh but he had a weird alarm system!
Yeah that alarm system was put into place because a crazy fan had snuck in and hid in his closet for days one time only sneaking out at night to get food or use the bathroom.
in the 90's it was harder to understand and get to the bottom of all this shyt because you had to rely on the media, or buy the magazines/newspapers that had the truth in them
now with social media, former staff and people who visited neverland, signed artists on MJJ records, studio engineers, all can just express themselves on social media and most of them are saying the allegations are B.S. and that they would've seen something
but again, a lot of people out here need MJ to be a pedophile for misdirection, nothing you show them will change their minds
but but the man down the street!!
Cant rock with you fam
Ive got strong principles when it comes to shyt like this... you already know how black folk are persecuted, why would you even give this a millisecond of a thought? THese are WHITE FOLKS AND MEDIA cosigning the destruction of a black man. That alone should prevent you from thinking he is guilty.
Then not to mention the accusers are clout chasing, over a decade of FBI investigations that led to nothing, and many children he invited over coming out to support him.
Your refusal to see all this evidence is outstanding. Yet you'll take the words of weirdo white trash that are in it for money and fame? For what?
I just dont understand this thought process
Fam, the reasons I don’t fukk with Mike go way beyond some pedophile allegations..
Ya’ll wanna preach this black vs white shyt like homie ain’t do EVERYTHING in his power to look white
The nikka bleached his skin WHITE, laid his natural hair down into some silky white people shyt, shaved his wide nose down to a skinny white man nose, reduced his wide lips to skinny Jerry Springer lips.. nikka even had a booty chin
fukk the pedophile shyt, that nikka did not wanna be black. I don’t rock with that.
If you cool with that, coo. That’s wassup. But I’ll never rock with nikkas getting rid of all their black features purposely. That’s out to me, as a dark skinned black man..
Ain’t shyt about that transformation normal dog
But do you, fam. I respect ya stance, if that’s ya mans that’s ya mans.
man, there's so much disinformation about this shyt, and it's mostly the media's fault.
As concise as I can make it:
1993 - the boy's father (Evan Chandler) accused MJ of molesting his son. and went to extremes to get his son to "confess". he initially pursued a CIVIL suit, would not go to the cops (if not for the law that required a psych to call the cops). judge wouldn't stop the civil suit before the criminal case from proceeding, so MJ/insurance/whoever settled on a negligence claim. criminal case proceeded regardless. ultimately ended because accuser (and dad) would not work with cops, and 2 grand juries declined to indict due to lack of evidence. most of the truth of this was printed in a GQ cover story by Mary Fischer: "Was Michael Jackson Framed?"
2005 - pure bullshyt. the prosecution's case started unraveling as soon as the accuser and family took the stand. accuser's story didn't pass cross examination, or did it even match the initial deposition. when asked in court, why he was upset with MJ, he said "because MJ didn't call me anymore", not because he was molested. the accuser's mom was caught in a whole lot of scams, including one with JC Penney that resulted in a $150K settlement, that got her in trouble for welfare fraud. she talked directly to the jury, including the foreman who I assume is a Mexican-American, snapping at them, and talking to the foreman as if they were skinfolk. the jury came back with a unanimous "not guilty" on all counts with little deliberation. best write up of this shyt was in Rolling Stone, by Matt Taibbi. look up interviews with Paul Rodriguez (Jury Foreman) for more info. btw, the prosecution got near everything they wanted out of this case and they still caught a big L. jury was mostly old-ass cacs who didn't give af about no damn MJ or his celebrity. so this wasn't some "OJ" shyt they could blame on nikkas, either. in recent times, a witness who was there (who was one of the people they were gonna call to court), a young woman named Jenny Winings (Google her, she has a Youtube channel and a Twitter), has noted how the accuser was really acting around Mike, that Mike wasn't with it, and ... frankly, that lil nikka sounded like a creep in retrospect.
Wade and James - filed civil suits between 2012-14 against MJ's companies for sexual abuse. Wade's case was initially filed under seal, likely to attempt a settlement being forced. James (repped by same lawyers) hopped on afterward. statute of limitations sent James's suit out. Wade's was about to go that way, but he decided to use a loophole to get around it, in which you have to have gone through therapy and "discovered" abuse within 3 years. only one problem: email correspondence from Wade was now made discoverable. in the emails, you find out he was emailing himself shyt from anti-MJ websites about himself, asking his mom if they actually happened, and even an email he sent to Estate reps trying to get on the MJOne Cirque de Soleil shyt. that same email was put on the Summerjam screen on French TV this year when Dan Reed was part of a panel interview. then you got this film, which has a gang of contradictions (even to their sworn testimony in the above civil cases), and the shyt that's come to light recently.
to be clear, I am not one of these nikkas that think every accuser is lying.... but these 2 GOTTA be, with all this bullshyt and the director moving the goal posts every time something new is found out. I also think that this might be bigger than these 3 (Wade, James, the director) but I have no proof of that. I even thought there was something to 93 because of the settlement, until I learned the likely truth of the matter. then I realized the media is pretty complicit in how fukked up this narrative is, and it's definitely true now.
the dum-dums ain't ever gonna change their position unless they recant, but my thing with Mike is -- many nikkas in the media have lied about him and they didn't need to. if he was gonna go down, it was in 2005. there was never any evidence. he was a weirdo, probably not the best person to hold up as your hero, but next to no evidence he's a pedo, unless you're a dumb nikka who inhales ceiling fan dust.
As concise as I can make it:
1993 - the boy's father (Evan Chandler) accused MJ of molesting his son. and went to extremes to get his son to "confess". he initially pursued a CIVIL suit, would not go to the cops (if not for the law that required a psych to call the cops). judge wouldn't stop the civil suit before the criminal case from proceeding, so MJ/insurance/whoever settled on a negligence claim. criminal case proceeded regardless. ultimately ended because accuser (and dad) would not work with cops, and 2 grand juries declined to indict due to lack of evidence. most of the truth of this was printed in a GQ cover story by Mary Fischer: "Was Michael Jackson Framed?"
2005 - pure bullshyt. the prosecution's case started unraveling as soon as the accuser and family took the stand. accuser's story didn't pass cross examination, or did it even match the initial deposition. when asked in court, why he was upset with MJ, he said "because MJ didn't call me anymore", not because he was molested. the accuser's mom was caught in a whole lot of scams, including one with JC Penney that resulted in a $150K settlement, that got her in trouble for welfare fraud. she talked directly to the jury, including the foreman who I assume is a Mexican-American, snapping at them, and talking to the foreman as if they were skinfolk. the jury came back with a unanimous "not guilty" on all counts with little deliberation. best write up of this shyt was in Rolling Stone, by Matt Taibbi. look up interviews with Paul Rodriguez (Jury Foreman) for more info. btw, the prosecution got near everything they wanted out of this case and they still caught a big L. jury was mostly old-ass cacs who didn't give af about no damn MJ or his celebrity. so this wasn't some "OJ" shyt they could blame on nikkas, either. in recent times, a witness who was there (who was one of the people they were gonna call to court), a young woman named Jenny Winings (Google her, she has a Youtube channel and a Twitter), has noted how the accuser was really acting around Mike, that Mike wasn't with it, and ... frankly, that lil nikka sounded like a creep in retrospect.
Wade and James - filed civil suits between 2012-14 against MJ's companies for sexual abuse. Wade's case was initially filed under seal, likely to attempt a settlement being forced. James (repped by same lawyers) hopped on afterward. statute of limitations sent James's suit out. Wade's was about to go that way, but he decided to use a loophole to get around it, in which you have to have gone through therapy and "discovered" abuse within 3 years. only one problem: email correspondence from Wade was now made discoverable. in the emails, you find out he was emailing himself shyt from anti-MJ websites about himself, asking his mom if they actually happened, and even an email he sent to Estate reps trying to get on the MJOne Cirque de Soleil shyt. that same email was put on the Summerjam screen on French TV this year when Dan Reed was part of a panel interview. then you got this film, which has a gang of contradictions (even to their sworn testimony in the above civil cases), and the shyt that's come to light recently.
to be clear, I am not one of these nikkas that think every accuser is lying.... but these 2 GOTTA be, with all this bullshyt and the director moving the goal posts every time something new is found out. I also think that this might be bigger than these 3 (Wade, James, the director) but I have no proof of that. I even thought there was something to 93 because of the settlement, until I learned the likely truth of the matter. then I realized the media is pretty complicit in how fukked up this narrative is, and it's definitely true now.
the dum-dums ain't ever gonna change their position unless they recant, but my thing with Mike is -- many nikkas in the media have lied about him and they didn't need to. if he was gonna go down, it was in 2005. there was never any evidence. he was a weirdo, probably not the best person to hold up as your hero, but next to no evidence he's a pedo, unless you're a dumb nikka who inhales ceiling fan dust.
reminds me of that one story where David Allen Grier talked about how Prince found someone in Paisley Park hiding in the airducts praying on him, people thought he was crazy until someone went up there and found her.
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
This is the reason cross examination exists in the court system. It's sad that people are willing to accept any old testimonial that's on tv.
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
AlbertPullhoez
The Takeover
Katt Williams said fukk Michael, it's fukk Michael