Do you have any verifiable data to back up these scenarios?Yea, its easier with example.
black kid with 3.8 gpa and 1800 SAT goes somewhere where the average SAT is 2200. He will get destroyed by the bell curve. Has nothing to do with race. Black kids get 2400 too. So now, this kid is in his second semester at MIT with a low GPA. He now leaves the computer science major to switch to sociology, where he curve doe not kill him, loses confidence, drops out, whatever.
Send the same kid to a state school with an 1800 average SAT. His work ethic helps him succeed, and is actually noticed. He can get research opportunities(everyone goes for them at the top school) because people will actually apreciate a hard worker. He finished the first semester with a 3.5, and has developed his study skills. Hes confident, and goes on to get a degree in computer engineering.
The 3.8 gpa 1800 SAT kid fails out of MIT and graduates with honors from UAlbany.
Second black kid. 2200 SAT from a shytty family. 3.0 gpa in high school with barely 50 percent attendance. The top schools will label him lazy. He will go to a state school and be surrounded by people far below his ability level. This could lead to a lot of different outcomes, but in the end he should be at a top school if not for family circumstance. IMO this should be the point of AA.
The first example is a phenomena Malcolm Gladwell and Thomas Sowell have written about. "Outliers" by Gladwell. And I dont remember which Sowell interview, in the interview he points out how the average black kid at MIT is in the top ten percent in Math in the country, but bottom ten percent in math at MIT.
The second one is basically my story/ anecdotal/ venting.
I don't agree because those examples and that explanation kinda excludes the fact that these higher level schools are full of kids who had the benefit of parent alumni and stacks of cash to get them through the door/across the stage as well.What dont you agree with in particular? I dont really have a postion, I just believe the implementation of Affirmative action hurts black students. Im only talking about in college admissions. Did you study STEM in college? No shade, but the curve is something you have to experience yourself.
Do you have any verifiable data to back up these scenarios?
Affirmative Action is very misunderstood by most non-legal people. It is not really a tool to get lesser qualified students admitted, it is a way to allow students who are equally qualified with another to be able to be admitted based on their race or gender or whatever. For example: Student A and B both have similar GPAs and SAT/ACT scores, but student B could get admitted over A (if it was an either/or thing anyway) based on using race as a "plus factor." There are lesser qualified white students just like lesser qualified black students at every school. Don't see how this has destroyed black people more.
I don't agree because those examples and that explanation kinda excludes the fact that these higher level schools are full of kids who had the benefit of parent alumni and stacks of cash to get them through the door/across the stage as well.
But nobody ever brings that up.
Yea, its easier with example.
black kid with 3.8 gpa and 1800 SAT goes somewhere where the average SAT is 2200. He will get destroyed by the bell curve. Has nothing to do with race. Black kids get 2400 too. So now, this kid is in his second semester at MIT with a low GPA. He now leaves the computer science major to switch to sociology, where he curve doe not kill him, loses confidence, drops out, whatever.
Send the same kid to a state school with an 1800 average SAT. His work ethic helps him succeed, and is actually noticed. He can get research opportunities(everyone goes for them at the top school) because people will actually apreciate a hard worker. He finished the first semester with a 3.5, and has developed his study skills. Hes confident, and goes on to get a degree in computer engineering.
The 3.8 gpa 1800 SAT kid fails out of MIT and graduates with honors from UAlbany.
Second black kid. 2200 SAT from a shytty family. 3.0 gpa in high school with barely 50 percent attendance. The top schools will label him lazy. He will go to a state school and be surrounded by people far below his ability level. This could lead to a lot of different outcomes, but in the end he should be at a top school if not for family circumstance. IMO this should be the point of AA.
The first example is a phenomena Malcolm Gladwell and Thomas Sowell have written about. "Outliers" by Gladwell. And I dont remember which Sowell interview, in the interview he points out how the average black kid at MIT is in the top ten percent in Math in the country, but bottom ten percent in math at MIT.
The second one is basically my story/ anecdotal/ venting.
I see your point here but AA also ensured that the black kid who had the grades to attend those schools without extra merit gets a chance to attend. Before, those kids were being denied purely on their race.
How does this make sense breh. I'm serious. When did the Jews go through hundreds of years of slavery in Germany. Come on now, man. You can't compare the two they are on totally different levels.We're in 1933-34 Germany right now. It's only a matter of time.