If you'd done a simple search you could have found the
achieved version of the 2010 Howard article here, just as wikipedia linked it.
Notice how you completely ignored the
2015 LA Times article that states that Kamala's parents went to civil rights protests together, she grew up in a black neighborhood, was bussed as a black student, attended a Black Baptist church as well as a Hindu temple as a girl, that her mother raised her as a young Black girl, and that she went to a HBCU.
I also missed another
2010 article from CNN that states that she grew up in Oakland/Berkeley, her parents took her to many Civil Rights protests, she went to Howard, and is seeking to become first Black and African-American AG in California history.
And you still keep ignoring all this shyt from confirmed people and orgs
So that's a clear reference that Kamala's Indian mother was meaningfully involved in the Black Radical movement, three different named figures involved in the Black Radical movement who are verifying it, and it dates all the way back to her name being cited as an influence in a 1983 book. So you think Kamala was secretly getting Black radicals to fabricate her mother's influence in the Black Power movement in 1983?
But people still trying to say she never claimed Black or had a Black history until this year.
It's misinformation like this that still has dumbasses claiming that she said she listened to Tupac in the 1970s, when she was clearly answering the initial question about who her favorite rapper was, not the joking follow-up about what she listened to when she smoked pot. She never once said "I listened to Tupac while smoking pot in college" but people wanted to run with that cause they never actually look into shyt.