Kamala Harris Fails To Explain Why She Didn't Prosecute Steve Mnuchin's Bank

FAH1223

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Hall of Fame
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
80,029
Reputation
9,940
Daps
237,103
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Call Me James said:
Boy stop.
Click to expand...

:stopitslime: do not say it's racist or sexist to ask fair questions. That's deflection. Kamal's should be questioned about things like OneWest especially with the information out there

I'm not saying she's a bad Senator or anything she literally just got to DC. But she has a record as a top state official. It's not unfair to ask her or talk about why she didn't want to prosecute a devil like Mnuchin.
 
Pressure

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,029
Reputation
7,291
Daps
152,519
Reppin
CookoutGang
FAH1223 said:
:stopitslime: do not say it's racist or sexist to ask fair questions. That's deflection. Kamal's should be questioned about things like OneWest especially with the information out there

I'm not saying she's a bad Senator or anything she literally just got to DC. But she has a record as a top state official. It's not unfair to ask her or talk about why she didn't want to prosecute a devil like Mnuchin.
Click to expand...
I made simple independent statements based on conversations I've had in the world. Harris came up. Most people don't have a clue who she is and these new articles are people's first introduction. That's why I called it a hit piece. Full disclosure: I'm not huge fan of her or booker.


Back to the topic. I presented, I think, three independent clauses that I believe to be true.

1. I don't believe the country is ready for a female president.

2. We don't see these types of articles written about up and coming republicans. If so not at this length or this frequent.

3. I think this is a hit piece. Whether you think this is a conversation worth having doesn't refute that.


Are 1, 2, and 3 false? If so, please explain why.

Best regards,

James. :yeshrug:
 
Don Homer

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
34,493
Reputation
6,855
Daps
116,827
Call Me James said:
I made simple independent statements based on conversations I've had in the world. Harris came up. Most people don't have a clue who she is and these new articles are people's first introduction. That's why I called it a hit piece. Full disclosure: I'm not huge fan of her or booker.


Back to the topic. I presented, I think, three independent clauses that I believe to be true.

1. I don't believe the country is ready for a female president.

2. We don't see these types of articles written about up and coming republicans. If so not at this length or this frequent.

3. I think this is a hit piece. Whether you think this is a conversation worth having doesn't refute that.


Are 1, 2, and 3 false? If so, please explain why.

Best regards,

James. :yeshrug:
Click to expand...
1. i think we can get a female president. If elizabeth warren was running, i think she would beat trump easily. Hillary was just an exceptionally bad candidate
2. Just because democrats are under more scrutiny, doesnt make it a hitpiece. It's based on genuine policy. And because many people are side-eyeing her, it makes sense that she answer for these things
3. If you think it's a hitpiece, ok. That's not something we can debate.

Full disclosue: I dont like Booker or Harris either
 
P

Phoenix Rising

Pro
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
874
Reputation
-105
Daps
1,496
CheckMate said:
yup. Same ol' bullshyt

Never mind the fact that they don't win elections at all with their current model.

It has nothing to do with purity tests. They just fukking suck

They werent talking about "purity" until 2016. What excuse do they have for the 2010, 2012 and 2014? They are just garbage politicians.
Click to expand...

Gerrymandering was the excuse during those times. Not that the policies are trash.
 
the cac mamba

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,321
Reputation
14,310
Daps
316,341
Reppin
NULL
GnauzBookOfRhymes

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
13,002
Reputation
2,889
Daps
48,563
Reppin
NULL
This is without even mentioning that ol girl was openly fukking Willie Brown (she was 29 and he was 60) WHILE HE WAS STILL MARRIED and shortly afterwards she is appointed to various oversight boards.

Apparently these idiots are trying to solidify their support among the 60 yr old +, males who are currently (or want to be) fukking their secretaries, voters.
 
satam55

satam55

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
45,907
Reputation
5,285
Daps
90,311
Reppin
DFW Metroplex
GnauzBookOfRhymes said:
This is without even mentioning that ol girl was openly fukking Willie Brown (she was 29 and he was 60) WHILE HE WAS STILL MARRIED and shortly afterwards she is appointed to various oversight boards.

Apparently these idiots are trying to solidify their support among the 60 yr old +, males who are currently (or want to be) fukking their secretaries, voters.
Click to expand...
:feedme: Backstory on this?
 
I_Got_Da_Burna

I_Got_Da_Burna

Superstar
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
7,257
Reputation
1,000
Daps
28,812
Reppin
NULL
GnauzBookOfRhymes said:
This is without even mentioning that ol girl was openly fukking Willie Brown (she was 29 and he was 60) WHILE HE WAS STILL MARRIED and shortly afterwards she is appointed to various oversight boards.

Apparently these idiots are trying to solidify their support among the 60 yr old +, males who are currently (or want to be) fukking their secretaries, voters.
Click to expand...

at first I thought you were on some :gurl::gurl::gurl:

but then I saw this:

Kamala's Karma

There's no damn way she runs for president....not with that kind of dirt. :camby:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top