Kamala Won!!!

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
37,309
Reputation
18,910
Daps
172,426
They cheated Gore right in our face so this is not a shock. Until there is a watershed moment, im not dying on this hill. Between voting machine fukkery and millions being disenfranchised, I can 1000% buy Kamala wins legitimately. Gotta show the work, though, because with proof the country is burning. No hyperbole.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,582
Reputation
9,864
Daps
175,392

2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances​


Published Jun 10, 2025 at 10:39 AM EDT

Trump Would 'Likely Not Be President' Without Elon Musk: Jeffries

By Khaleda Rahman

National Correspondent


Newsweek Is A Trust Project Member

A legal case questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election is moving forward.

The lawsuit, brought by SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group, filed the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York.

Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled in open court in May that the allegations were serious enough for discovery to proceed.

Newsweek has contacted SMART Elections for comment via email.

People cast their ballots



People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images



Why It Matters​


The lawsuit could renew debate about the 2024 election, though it won't change the outcome since Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump the winner.

It comes amid unconfirmed reports that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were cast in November's election. The federally accredited testing lab, Pro V&V, that signed off on "significant" changes to ES&S voting machines—which are used in over 40 percent of U.S. counties—"vanished from public view" after the election, according to the Dissent in Bloom Substack.



What To Know​


According to the complaint, more voters have sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, contradicting those results. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the presidential election results.

They include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but none voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president.

Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of the Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results.

Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely.

"If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election."

Max Bonamente said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity."

Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen.

"In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing.

"In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions."

What's Next​


The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,582
Reputation
9,864
Daps
175,392

2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances​


Published Jun 10, 2025 at 10:39 AM EDT

Trump Would 'Likely Not Be President' Without Elon Musk: Jeffries

By Khaleda Rahman

National Correspondent


Newsweek Is A Trust Project Member

A legal case questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election is moving forward.

The lawsuit, brought by SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group, filed the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York.

Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled in open court in May that the allegations were serious enough for discovery to proceed.

Newsweek has contacted SMART Elections for comment via email.

People cast their ballots



People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images



Why It Matters​


The lawsuit could renew debate about the 2024 election, though it won't change the outcome since Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump the winner.

It comes amid unconfirmed reports that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were cast in November's election. The federally accredited testing lab, Pro V&V, that signed off on "significant" changes to ES&S voting machines—which are used in over 40 percent of U.S. counties—"vanished from public view" after the election, according to the Dissent in Bloom Substack.



What To Know​


According to the complaint, more voters have sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, contradicting those results. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the presidential election results.

They include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but none voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president.

Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of the Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results.

Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely.

"If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election."

Max Bonamente said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity."

Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen.

"In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing.

"In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions."

What's Next​


The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,582
Reputation
9,864
Daps
175,392
Could this election investigation in NY lead to nationwide election audits?



Posted on Sun Jun 8 17:43:32 2025 UTC

/r/AskALiberal/comments/1l6i338/could_this_election_investigation_in_ny_lead_to/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retransmission-2024-presidential-senate-results-181500140.html

A judge in New York allowed a lawsuit about the 2024 election in Rockland County to move forward. The lawsuit claims something odd happened with the votes - some districts show people voted for the Democratic Senate candidate (Gillibrand) but somehow recorded zero votes for the Democratic presidential candidate (Harris). They also found cases where people swear they voted for an independent candidate, but their votes weren't counted properly. The numbers show unusual patterns that statisticians say are mathematically strange. The group filing the lawsuit wants a hand recount of all presidential and senate votes in that county.

ETA: more links

https://www.wjbf.com/business/press...lts-called-into-question-as-lawsuit-advances/

2024 Presidential and Senate Results Called Into Question as Lawsuit Advances

2024 Presidential and Senate Results Called Into Question as Lawsuit Advances


Commented on Sun Jun 8 18:38:44 2025 UTC

As stated in the complaint, more voters have sworn they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, directly contradicting those results.

"Many people have said"

Additionally, the presidential election results exhibit numerous statistical anomalies. The anomalies in the presidential race include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but where zero voters selected the Democratic Presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

Zero voters as in Kamala got no votes at all? Or people voted for the Dem senate candidate but not the Dem presidential candidate?

Additionally, a statistician determined that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results.

This is what we like to call "bullshyt" where I live. No amount of "stolen 2024 election" psyops will change this. Hard evidence would be needed. A "statisticians" imagination isn't enough.

On top of that, this is one county in a blue state. It's utterly meaningless and pure cope for those pushing the "stolen 2024" bullshyt ass narrative.
 

Tair

American Freedman
Joined
Nov 29, 2019
Messages
7,410
Reputation
3,228
Daps
37,191
Reppin
USA
Seriously, imagine still fukking crying about who the president is.

Yall do understand that by the time you posted on The Coli crying about this shyt 10 times a day since last year you could have got a whole got damn degree or learned a new skill that will make you so much money that you dont care who is in office, right?

Only miserable people are still thinking about this shyt 24/7

People could have gotten a 4 year degree in only 8-months simply by not complaining about the rigged election?

:wtf:
 
Top