murksiderock
Superstar
@Kinguno
By the way, the seminal players of the 10s were Bron, KD, Steph, I agree with you. Kawhi is a distant fourth, winning that backdoor chip last year has elevated him overnight into discussions he wasn't in a year ago, meaning, people thought he could be the best player alive if he was healthy, but legacy wise?
People weren't having legacy conversations about Kawhi a year ago, his resume ain't on the level of the other three guys. And I don't think he has a strong argument that he's better than any of them; at no point in Kawhi's career has he been a greater player than KD when KD is healthy; at no point in Kawhi's career until LeBron went down in Year 16 was he better than LeBron, yet people throw parties like a guy 8 years younger shouldn't be better than anybody playing in their 16th year if that guy is truly an elite player...
And Kawhi struggled acclimating with Aldridge the first year Aldridge came to SA, Kawhi dealt with injuries that postseason but he hardly left a mark in 2016, which we all know was the Year of Steph. His impact and legacy on the sport pales in comparison to Steph's, and he's only two years younger in basketball years. He may be better than Steph now but he ain't anywhere near Steph on a legacy scale yet...
The difference is while we know all athletes have egos, and they all think about being the greatest player and beating their top competition, Durant is the only one with a seemingly unhealthy obsession over it. They all think about it, they all want to be the last man standing, but only KD pouts if some random 34-year old white woman from Kansas posts on her Twitter that somebody is better than him...
By the way, the seminal players of the 10s were Bron, KD, Steph, I agree with you. Kawhi is a distant fourth, winning that backdoor chip last year has elevated him overnight into discussions he wasn't in a year ago, meaning, people thought he could be the best player alive if he was healthy, but legacy wise?
People weren't having legacy conversations about Kawhi a year ago, his resume ain't on the level of the other three guys. And I don't think he has a strong argument that he's better than any of them; at no point in Kawhi's career has he been a greater player than KD when KD is healthy; at no point in Kawhi's career until LeBron went down in Year 16 was he better than LeBron, yet people throw parties like a guy 8 years younger shouldn't be better than anybody playing in their 16th year if that guy is truly an elite player...
And Kawhi struggled acclimating with Aldridge the first year Aldridge came to SA, Kawhi dealt with injuries that postseason but he hardly left a mark in 2016, which we all know was the Year of Steph. His impact and legacy on the sport pales in comparison to Steph's, and he's only two years younger in basketball years. He may be better than Steph now but he ain't anywhere near Steph on a legacy scale yet...
The difference is while we know all athletes have egos, and they all think about being the greatest player and beating their top competition, Durant is the only one with a seemingly unhealthy obsession over it. They all think about it, they all want to be the last man standing, but only KD pouts if some random 34-year old white woman from Kansas posts on her Twitter that somebody is better than him...