that's fuqqed up but i'll leave that for another thread.
that's fuqqed up but i'll leave that for another thread.
I have no idea what the NBA bylaws are. But I don't see anyway in which you can take away something someone owns just because they are a racist. If only the Clippers were publicly owned like the Packers.
Someone posted part of their charter that explicitly says that discrimination is strictly prohibited as a prerequisite of owning or operating a team. I'll see if I can locate or verify that.
The NBA as a whole does receive public support and protection though. They do have an antitrust exemption don't they? Doesn't that require them to abide by CRA?
yo... after listening to the audio for the first time i wanna change my stance on all this sh1t.
that bytch set white dude up. i'm gonna have to side with the white dude. these groupie bytches are something else.
that's all i gotta say. forget all the other sh1t i said about him.
i think ppl are just running with this sh1t because it's a white dude.
Marge finally dissed Jews instead of just Blacks.Yeah. See this is why it feels like black people keep getting set up for the okeydoke. Everyone is outraged with no way to act on it. We're hoping that someone else swoops in and fixes a situation that has more to do with centuries of discrimination than anything that Sterling said or has done. Even the President feeds into playing whack a mole with racism by making statements when he knows its a wide spread problem has to be attacked from a systemic level.
This is a lot like the Duck Dynasty situation, except in this case Sterling named specific people he didn't want to be associated with. When Marge Schott was suspended for 2 years was it over her comments or had she taken some kind of discriminatory action that forced MLBs hand?
Never ever say anything good about Hitler.So I guess my question is, has Donald Sterling crossed the line from bigoted rhetoric into discriminatory action?
If what's been revealed this weekend about his hiring/firing practices and his payment practices is true -- according to court cases -- then yes, he went beyond rhetoric to discriminatory action. So how much did he pay the NAACP to give him an award, twice?So I guess my question is, has Donald Sterling crossed the line from bigoted rhetoric into discriminatory action?
he was just "player hating". you're allowed to player hate a lil bit but not to the point of being too insecure to being dysfunctional. your own friends player hate on you to their girls.He needed to be set up. He was far too comfortable saying the things he said on that tape. And it goes with all the other things re-revealed about him, his quotes, his activities, his refusal to hire people because they were black, the apartment situation. That whole nasty 'look at those beautiful black bodies' while his team is showering, showing them off to his bimbo of the moment as if they were show horses (or as if he has a Mandingo fetish he's only okay with letting out if a woman gives him a cover to do so).
As sick as it is of V. Stiviano to sleep with him, his wife is worse for staying with him and then blaming the girlfriend.
he was just "player hating". you're allowed to player hate a lil bit but not to the point of being too insecure to being dysfunctional. your own friends player hate on you to their girls.
it's "his woman" he was talking to. he actually did pretty good for being setup. he didn't go all out of magic. in fact he says he admired him. it's that bytch who was pushing him to say the other shyt. i swear these bytches can set niccas up and just cause they're females dudes will side with them.
nikka, are you for real, or are you
? I can't tell anymore, on this board.Marge finally dissed Jews instead of just Blacks.Never ever say anything good about Hitler.
I would argue so given his history. Telling someone not bring black people to his games could definitely be construed as that.
You have to take into account his whole body of work.
If what's been revealed this weekend about his hiring/firing practices and his payment practices is true -- according to court cases -- then yes, he went beyond rhetoric to discriminatory action. So how much did he pay the NAACP to give him an award, twice?
i am being for real. but if the movement is too strong he should just take a suspension to calm shyt down.nikka, are you for real, or are you
? I can't tell anymore, on this board.
I'd be the wrong person to ask about antitrust laws at this point in my life. Never wanted to wake up at 8:30AM to take that course. But by CRA are you referring to the Civil Rights Act...if you are, I don't see what type of legal claim you're referring to...being racist and having a racist policy are two different things.Someone posted part of their charter that explicitly says that discrimination is strictly prohibited as a prerequisite of owning or operating a team. I'll see if I can locate or verify that.
The NBA as a whole does receive public support and protection though. They do have an antitrust exemption don't they? Doesn't that require them to abide by CRA?
So there's a possibility that he could lose his team? If that's the case, then NBA players should be looking at a league wide boycott/ protest until he's removed or some kind of legal action against the league for doing continued business with a known racist. This Sterling issue has been left unchecked for 20 years and I can guarantee that other owners either felt the same way or knew the content of his character before those tapes were leaked which would make it a league wide endemic problem.
.
Yes my friend, this why I was saying that only the players have the power to demand respect and change. It's a racial and labor issue wrapped in one. Sterling will be tossed to the side in a heartbeat if the NBA feels their cash flow threatened. That seems like a minor victory compared to ultimately telling every other owner what will happen to their money if they keep on this course.
Only those players can bring social change and inspire others.
Just my opinion. I know what some are asking them to do is a tremendously risky and brave action but they have a monumental opportunity to take a defiant step.