I haven't looked at all the details but the judge from the video seems to have jumped to an unreasonable conclusion. It sounds like the family is relenting this fear their daughter has as something NEGATIVE...A result from the trauma of the home invasion. If the robber had on a bunny rabbit costume she'd probably be afraid of rabbits too. No reason to shame a family of victims for acknowledging the results a criminals actions had in their toddler.
The only reason i can see this judge taking personal offense is if he thinks the family is just pandering or making it up to appeal to the judge. Ie: would they have included that statement if the judge wasn't black?
stop it. The same efforts to mention having black friends, should have been the same effort to mention their efforts to address the daughter's fear
The family attempted to play on the instilled fear of some black folks to being held accountable as a race, for the action of individuals. Had the judge suffered from that poisonous mentality, he would've taken this opportunity to do some extreme BS to prove a point
Instead he took a measured and honest approach in addressing the common and careless stereotyping. He indirectly challenged the parents willingness to mention the fear the kid has, while not mentioning their own efforts in addressing the illogical fear of the daughter
The mere fact the parents mentioned having "black friends," assumed to be apart of the family prior to the burglary, further proved that they were trying to play on the instilled fear by some black folks because "friends" suddenly are not viewed suspiciously because of the acts of others
Just like when a kid has a nightmare, bullied by a kid of the same race, or are afraid of some costume during halloween, in most cases, reasonable approaches are taken to address each situation. But once a black person is involved, then the entire race needs to be held accountable is the epitome of white supremacist ideologies