I understand it but I don't agree with it. I think it's fukking stupid. It definitely benefits women. You rarely ever see this situation in reverse.
how many outlets are there for women to be a wealthy as men...point one. there aren't leagues for women creating thousands of millionaires like the NBA and NFL, there aren't a ton of us founding billion $ startups, being appointed as CEO, running hedge funds...the reality is there are a lot fewer female millionaires than men, so of course you dont see this a lot.
point two, women who are wealthy mostly date men in the same income bracket (or pull an oprah and don't marry their jumpoff
)...so again, another reason you don't see this often
lastly, IRL (ie average unknown people who won't make the news) where there are more couples where the female earns more, she's also likely to end up with the kids, therefore negating having to payout to her husband. yet even more of a reason this doesn't happen often
but there are enough examples to show that women who out earn their men/baby daddy get screwed too - halle berry, mary j, britney spears are all examples
This is what nikkas don’t get that contract regardless protects women. It really has nothing to do with men. Then people wounder why men no longer wanna get married...well with Feminism and all this shyt nothing really benefits a man so why do men continue to get married is the question ...
this is completely wrong...just say you see no point in getting married and KIM