@this shyt. Get some context. Obama is trying to manage a war-mongering hegemonic nation with a $739 billion annual budget, a bloated military-industrial complex that makes war a growth industry, and is tied up in a decades-long cycle of overseas intervention and blowback. Surely as a conspiracy theorist, I would think you understand this. Khalid Muhammad only had to give speeches in musty auditoriums about white people having sex with dogs in caves. He didn't have to get elected as President than operate as commander in chief.
Do you think screaming about killing cracker babies in some tiny mosque is more productive then doing what you can to make some good from the Oval Office? Are you gonna say some klansman is more admirable than Obama because he never ordered a drone strike?
Obama >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Khalid Muhammad. It's sad that someone would even compare the two. Like dude said, Muhammad was like Rush Limbaugh or someone. He was a buffoon whose ideas could not be taken seriously intellectually.
I definitely understand your viewpoint. Obama has much more at stake and much more responsibility than khalid. I don't disagree with that.
But now I want you to try and see the other side.
And that's the fact that wrong is wrong vic. Obama doesn't get a pass simply because he has a wider scope of responsibility. In fact that means we should hold him and his administration even MORE accountable. Obama should be held to a much higher standard if anything.
And the fact he "inhertied" these situations does not give him a pass either because he signed up for this, he sought out the position of president of the united states and commander in chief of the armed forces. So now he must live with the title AND the burden of that responsibility.
Just like any other CEO he is held responsible for the actions of his organization because he is the unquestioned leader.
So you have zero moral ground to stand on calling out khalid because obama and his administration are guilty of way worse atrocities than khalid, and you are guilty of supporting obama and condoning those atrocities under the guise that american is protecting global " democracy" ... What a joke. Same tired rhetoric bush was selling and we still buying it, I thought we would have learned by now.
And the worst part is how people try and justify these atrocities as collateral damage in the game of global politics. But again I ask, does that make these atrocoties right?
Is syria a threat to us?
Is libya a threat to us?
Is iraq a threat to us?
And those are just three examples of many.
You're justifying murder and oppression by supporting obama and condoning his administrations actions, period. And its not right no matter what spin you try and put on it. And the fact you can't admit that the US mudering these people is wrong and that obama as our leader should be held accountable is very sad, but yet typical of the brainwashed american mindset.
Its okay for us to murder others under false assumptions of "democracy," but let someone else even TALK about it and they are a monster or a disgusting human being. That's hypocritical no ifs ands or buts.
So I'm not knockin you hating on khalid, cuz honestly khalid wasn't all the way right either. Killing innocent white people (although that was only about 1 percent of his total message) is not right either.
But you can't call khalid this and that, but then support an administration that is doing way worse shyt than khalid ever talked about or did. Its hypocritical, dishonest, ignorant, and morally reprehensible.
So you should be calling out obama and the US govt just like you call out khalid because NEITHER STANCE IS JUSTIFIABLE morally. Do not support american terrorism just because you're american and you benefit from it. Call a spade a spade, and hold the proper entities accountable.
Really think about what I'm saying. Don't respond in 5 mins off emotion like you usually do, really absorb this information and look at it objectively. Wrong is wrong vic.
C'mon son, fukk outta hear w that bullshyt. That shyt sounds like the same propaganda technique books like The Turner Diaries use to incite white nationalists. You prey on ppls basic fears and insecurities and then tell them to take up arms for the impending race war. Ppl like Khalid Muhammad and David Duke r the same guy on the opposite ends of the spectrum. They spit some facts/racist rhetoric in an attempt to rile up their ppl, n those that aren't intelligent enough to question what they're being indoctrinated with eat it up. 
and "shut up CAC!" For this n that's expected but let's b serious, ppl just like this guy cuz he made white ppl angry....he's not a leader he's a substitute teacher like Chris Rock said lol
, dude was a maniac. You gotta respect any man who wouldn't duck and hide at the sight of those.
