Killzone ShadowFalls Multiple Player Not Native 1080p, 960x1080 Instead

[Fatboi1]

See how that works. You pull PC out of your ass to remove games from Xbox. But then you'll throw up the "better graphics than Xbox for multiplats" argument, but ignore the fact that they all perform much better on PC.

So if a game doesn't count for xbox since it's on PC, then "better graphics" doesn't count for PS4 due to PC also.

You can't have it both ways.

They all perform better on a PC with the right setup. You're missing that part. If I went to staples and bought a run of the mill desktop pc and tried to play a game using it's integrated graphics, it most likely wouldn't be on par with a PS4. The game that doesn't "count" for Xbox is Titanfall and that's simply because it's on PC. Those other examples are valid because they do perform better on PS4 compared to Xb1. You're not exactly enlightening us on a high end gaming pc playing games better than console counterparts . We could literally stop talking about PC in relation to how games perform and the points I've made before still stands, PS4 is the console to go for when it comes to multiplatforms in comparision with the XB1. It's really no point in arguing that when it's been proven. You can say they don't really show a difference, they are the same, games aren't truly 60fps but it don't matter. If you keep saying games aren't truly 60fps on PS4, then I will post a video of BF4 struggling on XB1 to maintain 60fps and that shyt running at 720P.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Lol! Where's the benchmark tool for what can be considered shyt?? Because you seem to imply that 1080p/60fps is the golden standard when cats like @Ciggavelli and @2gunsup are literally feasting with 1440p-4K PC setups. Dudes are with cutting edge graphics. Performance between the two consoles are what we are talking about, not PC. A PC gaming rig can be tweaked to gain performance, you can't on consoles.

Apparently Sony stans hold the benchmark tool, cause it changes depending on what system/game we are talking about. As I said over a year ago. Graphics aren't a benchmark of a games quality for me. That's the bed y'all made. Lay in it.

None of them are out?? Breh, MGSV comes out in a couple of weeks. Trine 2, Resogun, Outlast and the other games I named are already out are you serious?

You were talking about exclusive games I.E. reasons to Stan the ps4. Trine 2 outlast, or any of the other old PC games, which will eventually end up on Xbox don't fit that bill

Look at you contradicting yourself. LOL first you say, "And as for the games you named. None of them are even out yet. You don't even know enough about the order to claim its why you stan the ps4." and right after you say "now y'all switching it to infamous as if the world doesn't already know what that game is about." but how is that possible since it's not even out?? How do we know what it's all about??

Same way we knew killzone was gonna be killzone before its release.

You're going to say based off of Infamous 1/2 we know exactly what it's all bout right?? Guess I can say I know what Halo 5 is all about.

And yes we know what Halo is gonna be about. We may not know the exact story, but we've all played enough halo to have a pretty good understand of how Halo 5 will be.

When it's about Xbox or more specifically TITANFALL it's perfectly valid to talk about options because it's factual. It's a fact that you can play Titanfall on a PC that has other benefits besides playing games.

And you have plenty of other options for "better graphics" too. Why do you ignore that fact when it comes to ps4?

"Budget" PC is a broad term, budget can mean anything. My "budget" can be $700, yours may be $500 but that money can be spent on parts that are much more powerful than parts put into a console that released months ago. We paid $400 to play MGSV in 1080p/60fps, you paid $500 for 720p/60fps MGSV. That's like paying $800 for a 40 inch Insignia TV compared to a nice 40 inch Samsung TV for $700 but since the Insiginia TV is SMART, you opted for it instead.

Yup you paid $400 to wait and play 1 maybe 2 games per year. And Xbox owners payed $500 for a system that they will use all year around.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

You are clearly not in the right mental capacity right now because you sound like you copping pleas. How can "Microsoft" or "Sony" LIE about performance of their games?? Every game isn't the same breh. Microsoft and the industry been finding ways to downplay 1080p or 60fps when it isn't in their favor pertaining to a specific game running better on the PS4. It's way too much hypocrisy going off. Years ago sub hd was a big deal and it was always made apparent how Xbox 360 had the edge in most multiplatform games and how the subhd made a difference but now all of a sudden 1080p and 720p aren't that different.

Sony and GG told you killzone MP was 1080p 60fps and that was a direct lie.

And now the industry is conspiring to help the Xbox

You ever thought it may just be true that people don't give a shyt about resolution as much as y'all trying to harp on it?

It was the same last gen, to y'all it was all about graphics and proving the ps3 was stronger, even though it wasn't. Small differences in graphics didnt matter then, and they still don't matter now. But since that's the only advantage playstation has over Xbox that's all y'all want to talk about.

 

[daze23]

Microsoft has not lied about the performance of any of their games. With the way the Microsoft is evil witchhunt has been going these days, if this was a Microsoft title the Internet would have exploded and all the same dudes making excuses would be talking about how they lied and Xbox is evil.

This isn't the only lie Sony has told about the ps4 or games either

M$ has kinda walked the line by acting like their upscaler was magic

but to me it's not so much about "lying", as it is about this general attitude that the customers don't really know what they want. there's clearly a push for 1080p, 60fps games. if and when a game achieves that, they will advertise the fact. when it doesn't, it's all these "the human eye can't tell the difference", "you need to sit further back from your TV", "balance", excuses

 

[Fatboi1]

M$ has kinda walked the line by acting like their upscaler was magic

but to me it's not so much about "lying", as it is about this general attitude that the customers don't really know what they want. there's clearly a push for 1080p, 60fps games. if and when a game achieves that, they will advertise the fact. when it doesn't, it's all these "the human eye can't tell the difference", "you need to sit further back from your TV", "balance", excuses

for basically putting this in a easy to grasp nutshell.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

They all perform better on a PC with the right setup. You're missing that part. If I went to staples and bought a run of the mill desktop pc and tried to play a game using it's integrated graphics, it most likely wouldn't be on par with a PS4.

And neither would it outperform the X1

The game that doesn't "count" for Xbox is Titanfall and that's simply because it's on PC. Those other examples are valid because they do perform better on PS4 compared to Xb1.

TitanFall performs 100% better on Xbox than it does on Playstion.

Either we are comparing the two consoles alone, or we are allowing PC into the picture. You can't pick and choose what's valid, depending on which argument you are trying to make.

You're not exactly enlightening us on a high end gaming pc playing games better than console counterparts . We could literally stop talking about PC in relation to how games perform and the points I've made before still stands, PS4 is the console to go for when it comes to multiplatforms in comparision with the XB1.

And Xbox is the to to platform for quality exclusives in relation to ps4. It's really no point in arguing what's been proven.

It's really no point in arguing that when it's been proven. You can say they don't really show a difference, they are the same, games aren't truly 60fps but it don't matter. If you keep saying games aren't truly 60fps on PS4, then I will post a video of BF4 struggling on XB1 to maintain 60fps and that shyt running at 720P.

Like I said slightly better than underpowered is still underpowered. If y'all gone stand on the "next gen 1080p 60fps" argument, then you might want to wait untill playstation is able to achieve that.

 

[LucaBrasi]

and none of those platforms include the word playstation....but keep laughing



with the smaller community? by all means go ahead...and what excuses? i've never loved a game strictly for how it looks...how fukkin stupid would I be to keep dropping bread on garbage games because of how they looked? I've only dropped bread on the best games, you know the ones that look and play great...not either or...but if you wanna keep being a sucker for good looks with no substance go ahead duke...

and if it wasn't for these specs being released you wouldn't know which game was supposedly the better looking version on either console...but since you wanna ride that specs shyt...where is your 1080p/60 game at?

 

[Fatboi1]

Sony and GG told you killzone MP was 1080p 60fps and that was a direct lie.

And now the industry is conspiring to help the Xbox

You ever thought it may just be true that people don't give a shyt about resolution as much as y'all trying to harp on it?

It was the same last gen, to y'all it was all about graphics and proving the ps3 was stronger, even though it wasn't. Small differences in graphics didnt matter then, and they still don't matter now. But since that's the only advantage playstation has over Xbox that's all y'all want to talk about.

It's plausible. There's far too many cases of devs dismissing or downplaying the benefits of 1080p/60fps in the situation that a game doesn't perform like that on Xb1 compared to the PS4 version. I find it insulting for someone to say you can't tell the difference to me. Umm Yes I can. I was able to tell the difference between 1152x640 compared to 1280x720p but now all of a sudden 1280x720 to 1920x1080 is minimal.

Something like this shows a drastic difference but fast forward to today and if this was a Xbox One title you'd see sites saying the difference isn't that big, 30fps is better for cinematic gameplay, and all this other nonsense.

 

[Fatboi1]

And neither would it outperform the X1


TitanFall performs 100% better on Xbox than it does on Playstion.

Either we are comparing the two consoles alone, or we are allowing PC into the picture. You can't pick and choose what's valid, depending on which argument you are trying to make.



And Xbox is the to to platform for quality exclusives in relation to ps4. It's really no point in arguing what's been proven.



Like I said slightly better than underpowered is still underpowered. If y'all gone stand on the "next gen 1080p 60fps" argument, then you might want to wait untill playstation is able to achieve that.

Ignore the list of games that were said to be 1080p/60fps on PS4 just to push an agenda brehs

 

[MeachTheMonster]

M$ has kinda walked the line by acting like their upscaler was magic

but to me it's not so much about "lying", as it is about this general attitude that the customers don't really know what they want. there's clearly a push for 1080p, 60fps games. if and when a game achieves that, they will advertise the fact. when it doesn't, it's all these "the human eye can't tell the difference", "you need to sit further back from your TV", "balance", excuses

That stems from the devs themselves making 1080p 60fps like the holy grail of gaming, knowing that standard will never be consistently achievable in an affordable console. And that the advantages arent that big in the dirst place. Now they have to backtrack on the years of promises and standards that they set. PS4 was called a "super computer" but is not performing as well as a low-mid end computer. At least microsft was forthcoming in their ambitions of putting out an all around entertainment machine.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Ignore the list of games that were said to be 1080p/60fps on PS4 just to push an agenda brehs

Not one AAA game runs at 1080p 60fps on ps4. It is not a "supercomputer" in any way.

 

[Fatboi1]

Not one AAA game runs at 1080p 60fps on ps4. It is not a "supercomputer" in any way.

What is an "AAA" game?

 

[Wild self]

Not one AAA game runs at 1080p 60fps on ps4. It is not a "supercomputer" in any way.

Sony can't adapt to American style games very well. M$ does that shooting first-person style much better. If anything, Sony needs to get back their original swagger and release more Japanese style games with a lot of imagination of the PS1 and PS2 era.

 

[AkaDemiK]

Ya Bish!

What is an "AAA" game?

i'll let you know when one drops on the ps4

 

[MeachTheMonster]

It's plausible. There's far too many cases of devs dismissing or downplaying the benefits of 1080p/60fps in the situation that a game doesn't perform like that on Xb1 compared to the PS4 version. I find it insulting for someone to say you can't tell the difference to me. Umm Yes I can. I was able to tell the difference between 1152x640 compared to 1280x720p but now all of a sudden 1280x720 to 1920x1080 is minimal.

Something like this shows a drastic difference but fast forward to today and if this was a Xbox One title you'd see sites saying the difference isn't that big, 30fps is better for cinematic gameplay, and all this other nonsense.

Yup. Anything not negative about Xbox has to be some type of conspiracy

The benefits of 1080p 60fps are being overstated by console warriors, who are now upset that devs/journalists will not ride with them into the war.

In reality graphics don't make the game, graphical differences very rarely make a difference in the enjoyment you get from a game, and for most people in most situations they can't tell a difference unless you blow up two pictures and point them out. The only time performance matters is if you have a situation like skyrim where the game just doesn't work right on one system.