Scoring efficiency isnt the stats we're looking at...keep up. Literally no one thinks Lee's better than Russell.
So what efficiency stats are you going by?
Scoring efficiency isnt the stats we're looking at...keep up. Literally no one thinks Lee's better than Russell.
No actually they dont
So what efficiency stats are you going by?
Win share stats say Malone is the 3rd best player of all-time...ahead of Michael Jordan
Then they say John Stockton is 5th best player of all-time
What "efficiency" stats are you using that Kobe needed to be more efficient to do anything![]()
According to WS per 48, the Top 5 players of all-time are:
- Michael Jordan
- David Robinson
- Chris Paul
- Wilt Chamberlain
- Neil Johnston
On that list.....James Harden is ranked 31 spots ahead of Kobe Bryant on the All-Time list
Breh, get these analytics the hell outta here![]()
@Trip be like replace Kobe with Manu Ginobili (who's also ranked ahead of Kobe all-time going by WS per 48) and they still win 3 rings![]()
You going to argue that David Robinson didnt produce a ton of wins on shyt teams? Like if prime Kobe and the Admiral played together they dont win a chip? Johnson played in the 50's so he doesnt count.
Only questionable guy there is CP3, but he's still got a lot of time left before retiring.
Kobe should have retired 3 years ago...his stats have taken a hit in that regard. Even you know he's been awful for a while now.
The list has James Harden ahead of HOFers like Larry Bird, Bill Russell, Kevin McHale, Moses Malone, Julius Erving, Hakeem Olajuwon, Patrick Ewing, Scottie Pippen, etc.
Are you really using this list to judge players or are youing?
Video of @Bilz trying to hug Kobe after the game