Jhoon
Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
you're actually worse. much worse. like i know why he's a conservative clear. you're dumb as fukkPlease tell me this isn't what I sound like...
Krugman on Piketty: Why we're in a new Gilded Age
- Thread starter Julius Skrrvin
- Start date
-
- Tags
- discussion economics thoughts
Find me the first post because I'm not about to go through the posts of whoever is typing in those big ass capital letters. It's too late at night for that shyt.
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
Oh no way man, you're way better. Even when you're shytting out talking points, you're a good sport and can joke around and generally have a pleasant disposition. Plus no matter how wrong I think you are, you do do the knowledge and will at least take the things you read elsewhere and reiterate them in your own language. That isn't whats going on here. You seem like an alright guy to me. I could probably crack a six pack open with you and and peep some battles from NOME4 or something.
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
Broke Wave
The GOAT
Not at all my man. I'm actually very happy you decided to join us here in HL even though I disagree with you on economics.
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
Yeah he is a good voice and unlike most of libertarian HL @DEAD7 doesn't jump on the tinfoil hat brigade at every chance. He might hate the Fed but at least he doesntNot at all my man. I'm actually very happy you decided to join us here in HL even though I disagree with you on economics.
about it all day long on here/whine about jews
this review made me angry, mostly because the author works for an entity with "institute" as part of the nameNo worries bregh, here's the bitter Cato Institute response for your talking points
Piketty Gets It Wrong | Cato Institute
Did you have a specific gripe with the review itself? or just the source? and if so what?
it's a sophomoric rehashing of the usual talking points
it does not refute anything ascribed to the book
Is there ANY criticism of the book you'd accept?
sure
challenge the stats, the historical precedence, the analytical conclusions
have at it and while there present the same strength of data to support your claims
1. Watch what you Say in the Echo Chamber | Orderstatistic
2. Cripes, Maybe I’m in the Echo Chamber … | Orderstatistic
Economist to Economist right here.
Did YOU? I just posted it
I did read it.
Thats why I asked you to read it.
I follow a lot of econ sources.
Krugman is trying pass off his economic understanding as some de facto understanding when its masked liberalism.
you don't say....
yeah breh you got it
Krugman is nuts and not credible, you are sane and credible
thanks for the statistical and historical analysis and your supporting evidence