L.A. About To Go Down In Flames!!!! WTFFFF
- Thread starter Prince.Skeletor
- Start date
Pull Up the Roots
Veteran
Silver Surfer
Veteran
Vote Democrat, brehs....
You can't make this shyt up
You can't make this shyt up
Finna be the Wild West out in Los Hamsterdam, brehmigosJudge Riff must be a fan of Bunny Colvin.
Hamsterdam921
All Star
Judge Riff must be a fan of Bunny Colvin.
The Prince of All Saiyans
Formerly Jisoo Stan & @Twitter
It's a way to help the privileged class. If they can afford bail then they are above the law.
DaddyFresh
Superstar
At all. If they locked up every shoplifter prisons would be over capacity in days
Control your emotions little boy
Study shows those released under NY's bail reform laws are less likely to get rearrested
https://gothamist.com/news/study-shows-those-released-under-nys-bail-reform-laws-are-less-likely-to-get-rearrested By Matt Katz Published Mar 15, 2023 The entrance to the Rikers Island Correctional Facility. Controversial new state bail laws that some politicians say lead to offenders...
www.thecoli.com
Study shows those released under NY's bail reform laws are less likely to get rearrested
The two-year rearrest rate for people released due to bail reform was 44%, compared to 50% before the reform.gothamist.com
By
Matt Katz
Published Mar 15, 2023
The entrance to the Rikers Island Correctional Facility.
Controversial new state bail laws that some politicians say lead to offenders getting released and then rearrested actually had the opposite overall effect, according to a new study of criminal justice data released on Tuesday.
The study, from John Jay College’s Data Collaborative for Justice, showed that the 2020 bail reform laws eliminating judges’ ability to impose bail for low-level crimes actually reduced the likelihood that someone would get arrested again.
The one exception was for bail-eligible people who were released following recent violent felony arrests. The rate of rearrests for that cohort of offenders increased slightly.
“Fundamentally, we found that eliminating bail for most misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies reduced recidivism in New York City, while there was no clear effect in either direction for cases remaining bail eligible,” said Michael Rempel, director of John Jay College’s Data Collaborative for Justice, in a statement.
The study did not delve into the reasons behind the relative lack of recidivism among those who were released without having to pay bail. But experts have said that even temporary incarceration can lead to termination from jobs, family disruption and housing loss, which can incentivize further criminal activity.
The purpose of the 2020 reform laws was to allow people charged with most misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies to be released while their cases played out in court. That meant they didn’t have to choose between paying bail and going to the dangerous Rikers Island jails. Instead, judges had to release people under other conditions like supervised release, which involves nonprofit agencies in the community doing monitoring and support.
The reforms were designed to reduce incarceration and stop putting people in jail just because they could not afford to post bail. But since the laws went into effect, politicians who oppose bail reform — such as Democratic Mayor Eric Adams — and conservative outlets like The New York Post, have argued that the laws went too far and led to violent criminals roaming free on city streets.
"We have a recidivism problem in New York and far too many people, there's about 2,000 people who are repeatedly catch, release, repeat in crimes," Adams said earlier this month. "If we don't take them off our streets, they're going to continue to prey on innocent people."
This new study found that the two-year rearrest rate for those released due to bail reform was 44%, compared to 50% for those with similar charges, criminal histories and demographics who were held in jail in the period before the reform.
It also took longer for those released as a result of bail reform to get rearrested than those forced to do a stint in jail after being charged.
Since the bail reform measures passed in 2019 and 2020, the new laws’ effect on crime has been perhaps the most debated topic in New York politics. It was a central focus of last year’s state elections, with Republicans and conservative Democrats alike claiming it led to spikes in crime, especially shootings and burglaries, because people were released without bail and went on to commit illegal acts. But so far data to prove that assertion has been limited, as have analyses countering the argument.
Tuesday's report tracked alleged offenders over a longer period than prior studies — including the time after cases were disposed of — and compared rearrests of those released pretrial due to bail reform and other statistically similar people who were held in jail.
“Our goal with this study was to substantially upgrade the credibility of information known to New Yorkers about bail reform and recidivism,” said Rempel in a statement.
Bail reform remains a hotly debated topic. Gov. Kathy Hochul is now seeking to eliminate the mandate that judges impose the “least restrictive condition” necessary on those charged with crimes still eligible for the imposition of bail, like violent felonies. The change would give more discretion to judges to allow them to impose higher bail amounts in order to keep more people locked up pretrial if they can’t afford to pay. But opponents say the proposal is unconstitutional.
The bail reform laws were initially passed in 2019 and modified in 2020 and 2022. The latest modifications went into effect in May and were not part of the John Jay study.
Offenses that are still not eligible for mandatory release are almost all violent felonies, sex offenses and certain domestic violence cases. Judges can order holding certain repeat offenders and those deemed a flight risk.
Man out on bond for capital murder arrested in another deadly Houston shooting
A 20-year-old suspect, who was released on bond in November for a capital murder charge, has now been charged with capital murder for a deadly shooting last month.www.fox26houston.com
This is why bail Reform matters.
www.thecoli.com
so it could also be interpreted as "deep" placesYou would have to show me how "divers" is synonymous with "diviners". The biblical lexicon defines it as "Different, Unequal or Various". If we look how its used in Luke and Hebrew it lines up.
when the elders of moab approached balaam they came with "diviners fees" in hand as well
a diviner by definition is someone looking deep into something to read it. IE people reading the patterns in weird things (see chinese oracle bones)
for further context:
Acts 19:8-10
here divers is clearly a type of person. not a weight or measure. Its definitely in reference to divinatory priests. Thats why there are "divers laws":
Bible Gateway passage: Deuteronomy 25:13-19 - King James Version
Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small. Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small. But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have: that thy days may be lengthened in the land which the LORD thy...
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
Because for some people, usually the ones who commit crime, the only incentive not to do it in the first place is not being able to afford to get out. People with money tend not to do the crimes in this new policy.
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
So if you’re poor, you should face no consequence for theft? Just let poor people take whatever they want?