GetInTheTruck
Member
They shouldn't get shyt.
Many times a cheap laptops performance can be so bad as to inhibit actually getting work doneMan fukk these dumb liberal beauracrats. Why the hell would these teachers think an IPad would be better than a cheap laptop?
Be a liberal educator brehs..
fukk they need iPads for?
kind of bullshyt is this
this was all part of steve jobs marketing plan. You start off now, and when they get older apple would be the only thing they would know.Man fukk these dumb liberal beauracrats. Why the hell would these teachers think an IPad would be better than a cheap laptop?
Be a liberal educator brehs..
were you happy with an encyclopedia? google ruined everything? you guys are dopes.I was happy when they used to wheel in the tv with the VHS.. they get iPads nowadays??
Reading is better for the mind than staring endlessly at a screen with little mental stimulation. But what do I know, I'm a dope.were you happy with an encyclopedia? google ruined everything? you guys are dopes.
Caputo-Pearl cites the bungled $1 billion iPad program, an effort, at the start of the 2013 school year, to put a tablet in the hands of every student in the district. The rollout began amid confusion over whether students would be allowed to take the devices home and who’d be held responsible if they were lost or stolen. There was public outcry over the program’s billion-dollar price tag. Deasy ended the program after emails revealed he discussed a possible contract with Apple before bidding took place; he has denied any wrongdoing. Still, Caputo-Pearl refers to the situation as a “scandal.”