Lakers gonna make run at Paul George

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,874
Reputation
7,330
Daps
183,773
For one Bill Simmons started this rumor so its just his idea.

Secondly, Russell and and the #2 pick would be good value for PG but only if PG wanted out and had leverage, which he doesnt. Teams dont look at current production when judging young guys and draft prospects. Players drafted top 2 are more likely than not to become stars. Ben Simmons is more highly regarded as a prospect than PG ever was. You got to have good vision to make strong trades. People laughed at The Grizz for trading Pau for his brother, look how that turned out. Ben Simmons and D'angelo Russell would be great value for the Pacers. According to Bill, executives around the league think highly of Russell and most expect him to be an all-star relatively soon. With that said, Lakers might not even get the pick. And shouldnt do this unless they got other FA lined up forsure forsure. Lakers need to sign a 3 and a Center and continue the rebuild. Theyve hit on every draft pick so far, even the late ones. Max out Barnes and sign a center.
Max out Barnes? :dwillhuh:
 

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,992
Reputation
-3,427
Daps
59,859
Reppin
NULL
Max out Barnes? :dwillhuh:
Thats if we lose our pick. Im not getting my hopes up about keeping the pick. If we lose it we got a huge hole at SF, he fits our needs (perimeter shooting and defense), is still young, and is familiar with Luke's system. Yes its risky, but id rather do that than pay DeRozan or trade all our assets for a star. Barnes numbers could explode with more usage.
 

Populair

Guess what?
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,689
Reputation
5,201
Daps
23,037
Reppin
Just a Kid From Chicago
Name a "superstar" that the Lakers supposedly HAVEN'T targeted over the past several years now since they've been trash? All of that "do it Mitch" and look what you have to show for it.

207rhq1.jpg
 

AAKing23

92' til Infinity....
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
43,991
Reputation
7,753
Daps
161,821
Reppin
NJ-PA
For one Bill Simmons started this rumor so its just his idea.

Secondly, Russell and and the #2 pick would be good value for PG but only if PG wanted out and had leverage, which he doesnt. Teams dont look at current production when judging young guys and draft prospects. Players drafted top 2 are more likely than not to become stars. Ben Simmons is more highly regarded as a prospect than PG ever was. You got to have good vision to make strong trades. People laughed at The Grizz for trading Pau for his brother, look how that turned out. Ben Simmons and D'angelo Russell would be great value for the Pacers. According to Bill, executives around the league think highly of Russell and most expect him to be an all-star relatively soon. With that said, Lakers might not even get the pick. And shouldnt do this unless they got other FA lined up forsure forsure. Lakers need to sign a 3 and a Center and continue the rebuild. Theyve hit on every draft pick so far, even the late ones. Max out Barnes and sign a center.

:mjlol:
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,874
Reputation
7,330
Daps
183,773
Thats if we lose our pick. Im not getting my hopes up about keeping the pick. If we lose it we got a huge hole at SF, he fits our needs (perimeter shooting and defense), is still young, and is familiar with Luke's system. Yes its risky, but id rather do that than pay DeRozan or trade all our assets for a star. Barnes numbers could explode with more usage.

Maxing Barnes because you lost the pick would be a terrible panic move
 

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,992
Reputation
-3,427
Daps
59,859
Reppin
NULL
Maxing Barnes because you lost the pick would be a terrible panic move
it wouldnt be a panic move, more of a projection move. Its not like we're signing a 28 year old Demarre Carroll. Barnes only 23 and could reach closer to his potential in a bigger role
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
25,558
Reputation
4,855
Daps
108,718
it wouldnt be a panic move, more of a projection move. Its not like we're signing a 28 year old Demarre Carroll. Barnes only 23 and could reach closer to his potential in a bigger role

He hasn't shown anything in his career to justify giving him max money or that he can be a cornerstone for a franchise

He's pretty much benefiting from his high school/college hype still and playing for an ATG team
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,874
Reputation
7,330
Daps
183,773
it wouldnt be a panic move, more of a projection move. Its not like we're signing a 28 year old Demarre Carroll. Barnes only 23 and could reach closer to his potential in a bigger role
I disagree strongly about Barnes

A max deal would be drastically overpaying
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,176
Reputation
3,312
Daps
154,852
it wouldnt be a panic move, more of a projection move. Its not like we're signing a 28 year old Demarre Carroll. Barnes only 23 and could reach closer to his potential in a bigger role
any team outside of the warriors(due to cap anyway) SHOULD NOT be looking to max out barnes
 
Top