954UAlreadyknow
All Star
I hate Hardens game but this thread is trash
Harden's shown little offensive growth. 10 ppg to 12 to 17 to 26 in his first 4 years.you dont become a better defender over-nigh,t for the most part its natural for wings. Paul George, Kobe, Wade, etc. were great perimeter defeders EARLY on in their career. Players that come in playing no D on the perimeter usually leave the game the exact way. And he's showed little offensive growth since he's been in the league. He relies heavily on 3's and slashing. Lance seems to get better offensively every year. I can visually see things he adds to his game each year. Right now, he does everything better than Harden outside of scoring more points. If he scoring 13ppg on 11fga on 47% shooting why is out of the realm of possibility to assume he can be a 22, 7 and 6 dude that provides excellent defense and energy aka better than Harden?

You still have not made any compelling case to me as why I should believe Stephenson is going to surpass Harden in the near future.Thefactor and how much it impacts your feelings has nothing to do with this.
I feel Stephenson is a better ball handler, passer and rebounder. The only thing Harden has over him is shooting and that's because he gets off more shot attempts.You still have not made any compelling case to me as why I should believe Stephenson is going to surpass Harden in the near future.
Harden's shown little offensive growth. 10 ppg to 12 to 17 to 26 in his first 4 years.
In the same span, Lance put up 3ppg, then 2, then 9, and now 13. Impressive!
Lance Stephenson is a role player and a good wildcard. Thats it. When Harden was in his role he put up better numbers in less minutes. Every year.
Asinine thread.
he's basically turning into the player we thought Tyreke Evans could become.
.

Paul GeorgeHarden currently is a top 8ish player. You're basically saying Lance will one day be a top 5 player....

You can't say he's better now but the way he's made such strides in the last two years it's not a stretch to say he could be better in the next few. Cot damn it hurts to see some of these Indiana nikkas develop so much in such a short time![]()
Harden is putting up 24, 6 and 5.Paul George


im not saying he's better now, Im saying he could be. I think he 'will' be, but of course i'll give it time before I say that. I think its a fair discussion. And I think its an ironic comparison considering nobody thought Harden would be a top 2 SG, when he was in OKCYou can't say he's better now but the way he's made such strides in the last two years it's not a stretch to say he could be better in the next few. Cot damn it hurts to see some of these Indiana nikkas develop so much in such a short time![]()
I think Paul George way better than Harden so no I dont think he will surpass him.Harden is putting up 24, 6 and 5.
Paul George is putting up 24, 6 and 4
Lance 13, 7 and 5
Lance is a better rebounder and playmaker than Paul George.
Lance about to surpass PG?
Fun w/ Coli logic![]()
Forget about Harden.I think Paul George way better than Harden so no I dont think he will surpass him.
While I definitely wouldn't take Stephenson over Harden yet, when you factor in defense the comparison gets a whole lot closer. Harden has been a sieve on defense and probably gives up more than he scores on a given night.The Coli: Where 13, 7 and 5 is better than 24, 6 and 5.