

How many black people voted for that bill? Since you keep mentioning it back up your claims.What I'm saying to you is that the only black people who're outraged are the ones who weren't paying any attention nor cared until recently.
Black people back at that time thoroughly understood the bill from head to toe which is why many supported it, so when you're saying Clinton intentionally wrote the bill but you're also trying to allude that those black people had no clue how the bill would work, but how is that so if many understood and backed it?
Why does the coli keep trying to paint black voters as retarded imbeciles who don't know anything while walking inside of polling booths blindfolded?
I'm not questioning your dislike of Bill Clinton since I myself was a little child at the time however I think it's unfair to shyt on Bron (and others alike) for something he himself probably knows nothing about cause like I said, he was at least between 12-14yrs old so what exactly could he have known.The sentencing disparities written into the law are racist. They punished crack cocaine significantly more than powder cocaine for no good reason other than black people used more crack than powder cocaine.
Bill Clinton was smart enough to know why this punishment disparity was written in the law, he was well aware of the only logical reason for such a disparity is to target black people.
That makes Bill Clinton a racist and makes anyone who dislikes Bill Clinton justified in their dislike of him for targeting black people for mass incarceration.
End of discussion.
its just that celebrity crowd, they love the Clintons..and anyone mainstream democrats push..it is what it is.welp it isn't like king james is the first to say this nonsense. chris rock, cedric the entertainer, jay z, das efx, humpty hump, mc breed. lol you name it.
which is interesting to me because of course this whole thing started with toni morrison, may she rest in peace. saying back in '98 that bill was blacker than any actual black person who would be elected in our lifetime. and this is why i say this idea that black men are by and large these disrespectful daily perpetrators of misogynoir is absolute nonsense. to the queens? hell naw. we've been taught since day ONE to look at our blackness through the lens of the post-civil rights black woman's ridiculous feminist & womanist views. they were appointed leaders by the ofays and we unwittingly regurgitate their gynocentric drivel in the guise of pro-blackness. we stay echoing their problematic talking points like this nonsense. it is what it is
I assume that many of his supporters backed up his bill, a lot of black people at the time were trying to get reduce the amount of crime polluting neighborhoods, so I believe a lot of black people co-signed it with good intentions.How many black people voted for that bill? Since you keep mentioning it back up your claims.
Next time just say you dont have receipts. Lebron does alot of good so im not trippin on him but the juelzin for this comment is corny.I assume that many of his supporters backed up his bill, a lot of black people at the time were trying to get reduce the amount of crime polluting neighborhoods, so I believe a lot of black people co-signed it with good intentions.
It's funny how the coli has no plan nor interest in improving communities except juelize at every possible solution. Black people at that time viewed the bill as a way to cut down on some of the crimes being produced.
The community is divided. While you got a certain segment trying to make their area safer to live, there's another segment who gets angry because you're trying to get rid of the shyt.
It's a lose-lose situation because one side sees the crime happening and wants to do something about it, however, then you have the other side who sees it also but for some reason has an obligation to defend the ones who openly commit crimes.
I have nothing else to say here.
You're talking too much sense and sense don't work around here, when logic is out of the window.I assume that many of his supporters backed up his bill, a lot of black people at the time were trying to get reduce the amount of crime polluting neighborhoods, so I believe a lot of black people co-signed it with good intentions.
It's funny how the coli has no plan nor interest in improving communities except juelize at every possible solution. Black people at that time viewed the bill as a way to cut down on some of the crimes being produced.
The community is divided. While you got a certain segment trying to make their area safer to live, there's another segment who gets angry because you're trying to get rid of the shyt.
It's a lose-lose situation because one side sees the crime happening and wants to do something about it, however, then you have the other side who sees it also but for some reason has an obligation to defend the ones who openly commit crimes.
I have nothing else to say here.
The narrative is that he did something to the detriment of black people and therefore should not be supported.Because the narrative is that Clinton did something black people absolutely didn't support, but that's not really true.