Lebron doesn't have the tools to have 5 60 point games

[HendriX]

I wish I could slap the faq shiit out this clown..not only is he :kellstear: at Lakers being ass for the past 3 years...and :kellstear: at Lebron ending up with more MVP's than his hero..

Fukkboi clinging to Bron's 2011 performance like Kobe's 2004 and 2008 ones dont exit..

He's also blatantly ducking the FACTS that's presented by several posters on here on some

shiiit

just ga head and eat a fat dikk

 

[Newzz]

So, we comparing who did better in their NBA Finals LOSSES?

Okay

2004 NBA Finals, Kobe averaged 22.6 ppg
2008 NBA Finals, Kobe averaged 25.7 ppg

So, in his 2 NBA Finals losses Kobe averaged 24.2 ppg

VS

2007 NBA Finals, LeBron averaged 22.0 ppg
2011 NBA Finals, LeBron averaged 17.8 ppg

So, in his 2 NBA Finals losses LeBron averaged 19.9 ppg

And LeBron can have more REGULAR season MVPs.....Kobe has more Nba FINALS MVPs and Championship rings

 

[HendriX]

And LeBron can have more REGULAR season MVPs.....Kobe has more Nba FINALS MVPs and Championship rings

Yeah too bad the kang is retiring after this year
























































and post the fg% on those finals L's.

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

Exactly. We all know LeBron could easily force up 10-15 more shots a game and regularly put up individual scoring totals in the 40's, 50's, 60's, etc on a regular basis. He'd also have a team record that is similar to what Kobe's is right now.

This is retarded.

The Lakers are 89-39 in games where Kobe scores 40+. LeBron is 37-11 in games where he's scored 40+

But we're supposed to sit here and pretend that if Bron somehow managed to go off for 40+ regularly the Heat would be a sub .500 team?

 

[Bilz]

This is retarded.

The Lakers are 89-39 in games where Kobe scores 40+. LeBron is 37-11 in games where he's scored 40+

But we're supposed to sit here and pretend that if Bron somehow managed to go off for 40+ regularly the Heat would be a sub .500 team?

But what is the Lakers record when Kobe shoots 25+ times and scores less than 40? When you're going to post stats to try to justify his shot jacking, you can't be conveniently leaving his bad games out of the sample.

The Heat would win most of LeBron's 40,50,60 point games but they would lose the games when he didn't have it.

 

[TUA TAGOVAILOA]

 

[Gravity]

I'm amazed at that LeBron is better off the ball quote considering what we saw in the '11 Finals and throughout his time in Cleveland.

His entire game was off during that finals series. As far as Cleveland, he didn't have the luxury of playing off the ball with the Cavs. Those teams were dependent on him being the primary playmaker and scorer. I'll assume that you watched these past 2 Olympics where Kobe and Lebron played on the same team. So honestly, who was better of the ball on those '08 and '12 teams? Obviously it was Lebron. If Kobe is so great moving without the ball, then why does he play hero-ball so much? Kobe has had the benefit of always playing with great passing big men, yet the biggest knock against his game is that he plays hero-ball too much. He too often abandons the team concept and goes into Psycho-Bean/Black Mamba mode.

Stick to soccer you euro scum fakkit eat a dikk and die bytch

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

But what is the Lakers record when Kobe shoots 25+ times and scores less than 40? When you're going to post stats to try to justify his shot jacking, you can't be conveniently leaving his bad games out of the sample.

The Heat would win most of LeBron's 40,50,60 point games but they would lose the games when he didn't have it.

I'm not trying to justify anything. I'm addressing what you said.

The argument that the Heat would be a sub .500 team if Bron was regularly going off for 40+ is a poor argument. Doesn't make sense logically and isn't supported by what has happened when he's managed to do it.

It's just a stupid cheap shot at Kobe/Lakers, something you do regularly. If I wanted to do that I'd just point out that in the years where he was scoring 40+ the most, the lakers weren't a sub .500 team either. 02-03 and 05-06.

You put someone who's capable of scoring like that on a regular basis, on a team with that much talent...they are going to be a problem. Not a team that loses more than they win.

 

[Bilz]

I'm not trying to justify anything. I'm addressing what you said.

The argument that the Heat would be a sub .500 team if Bron was regularly going off for 40+ is a poor argument. Doesn't make sense logically and isn't supported by what has happened when he's managed to do it.

It's just a stupid cheap shot at Kobe/Lakers, something you do regularly. If I wanted to do that I'd just point out that in the years where he was scoring 40+ the most, the lakers weren't a sub .500 team either. 02-03 and 05-06.

You put someone who's capable of scoring like that on a regular basis, on a team with that much talent...they are going to be a problem. Not a team that loses more than they win.

So why are the Lakers a sub .500 team right now genius?

One player controlling a huge portion of the team's offense is not a sustainable strategy for success. It can work at times since the best scorers in the NBA can beat teams single handedly when they're on but if they're forcing up a bunch of shots when they don't have it, they're simply taking shots away from other players that had better chances of scoring. The Lakers had their best years when Kobe wasn't putting up his best individual scoring numbers.

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

So why are the Lakers a sub .500 team right now genius?

One player controlling a huge portion of the team's offense is not a sustainable strategy for success. It can work at times since the best scorers in the NBA can beat teams single handedly when they're on but if they're forcing up a bunch of shots when they don't have it, they're simply taking shots away from other players that had better chances of scoring. The Lakers had their best years when Kobe wasn't putting up his best individual scoring numbers.

If it's not a sustainable strategy for success why has Kobe Bryant, one of the most regular 40+ scorers in NBA history enjoyed as much success as about any other player in the league?

LOL at you trying to bring up this year, a sample size of ~25 games and ignore the larger sample: His whole career.

 

[Malta]

Bron top 5 in scoring, top 10 in assists, top 10 in FG%, Kobe never had the tools to do that

 

[Bilz]

If it's not a sustainable strategy for success why has Kobe Bryant, one of the most regular 40+ scorers in NBA history enjoyed as much success as about any other player in the league?

LOL at you trying to bring up this year, a sample size of ~25 games and ignore the larger sample: His whole career.

I don't know how to help you, you're just not getting it. The Lakers best years have not been when Kobe individually scored the most, they have been when his TEAMMATES have scored the most. Simply having Kobe or LeBron gun as much as they can is not going to get them anywhere. Try all you want to argue otherwise but the stats don't back you.

You're using a skewed sample because you're only counting the times he was actually successful in getting the 40 points and not the games where he shot 9 out of 31 and shot his team out of it.

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

I don't know how to help you, you're just not getting it. The Lakers best years have not been when Kobe individually scored the most, they have been when his TEAMMATES have scored the most. Simply having Kobe or LeBron gun as much as they can is not going to get them anywhere. Try all you want to argue otherwise but the stats don't back you.

You're using a skewed sample because you're only counting the times he was actually successful in getting the 40 points and not the games where he shot 9 out of 31 and shot his team out of it.

No. I get it you're just a Kobe hater who will look for any angle to try and tear him down. Even in circumstances where it doesn't make sense to.

We aren't arguing whether or not the Lakers' best years came when Kobe didn't have to fully shoulder the scoring load. No shyt that the Lakers had more success when Kobe was surrounded by better teammates...as opposed to years like 05-06 when he was by himself and had to score 35 a game. This is obvious not some revolutionary thought. Quit trying to change the subject.

I was arguing how retarded it was for you to suggest the Heat would be a sub .500 team if Lebron was regularly going for 40,50,60. That makes no sense at all. Just a lazy way to try and throw a jab at Kobe. If you're going to run around trying to bash dude in every thread at least do a better job at it.

 

[Swagnificent]

am I the only one who finds LeBron's game BORING?

dude is a great player but he's like Tim Duncan....efficient but boring

give me Kobe shooting fadeaway over 3 nikkas anyday

 

[Midwest]