Lebron has taken 175 jumpshots from the left side of court & only 87 from the right

[Johnny Kilroy]

Were you around when Jordan was playing because I wasn't. If you weren't around to see what the reporters were saying, coaches, players, ect. you cant say who had more scrutiny. People always talk nice after the player retires so we can't really tell how tough MJ had it.

Remember Jordan's "Alcoholism" scandal, his "Gambling" scandal, his "Scoring champs don't win titles", "Is he a great player but bad team mate", ect.

Yes. I was.

Jordan was never predicted to the GOAT when he entered the league. He didn't have that pressure. The media wasn't what it is today either. Jordan had way more scandals than LeBron as a player but there was no twitter or tmz tracking your every move.

LeBron has dealt with way more. They didn't pry into your personal life back then like they do today.

The one similarity between the 2 is that they were both "losers". I remember people used to say the same things about Jordan that they used to say about LeBron. How he couldn't win a title and all that. It's like deja vu.

 

[Marvel]

Yes. I was.

Jordan was never predicted to the GOAT when he entered the league. He didn't have that pressure. The media wasn't what it is today either. Jordan had way more scandals than LeBron as a player but there was no twitter or tmz tracking your every move.

LeBron has dealt with way more. They didn't pry into your personal life back then like they do today.

The one similarity between the 2 is that they were both "losers". I remember people used to say the same things about Jordan that they used to say about LeBron. How he couldn't win a title and all that. It's like deja vu.

Co-sign

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Marvel]

You weren't being objective. You were lying.

The entire atmosphere in sports has ramped up since MJ left.

You were much more able to control the narrative during his time.

True, imagine LT when he was playing with the NY Giants and TMZ was around. He wouldn't last a year under today's media.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Hacksaw Jim Thuggin]

Yes. I was.

Jordan was never predicted to the GOAT when he entered the league. He didn't have that pressure. The media wasn't what it is today either. Jordan had way more scandals than LeBron as a player but there was no twitter or tmz tracking your every move.

LeBron has dealt with way more. They didn't pry into your personal life back then like they do today.

The one similarity between the 2 is that they were both "losers". I remember people used to say the same things about Jordan that they used to say about LeBron. How he couldn't win a title and all that. It's like deja vu.

another ol' nikka...

im old enough that i actually saw the georgetown-unc game and watched jordan in the olympics in '84

and you are correct sir...the same things they said about jordan then...they say about lebron now...

back then the NBA belonged to magic and bird...they had great teams too...jordan came along with that one-man gang shyt and people said he wouldnt win becuz he scored too much and didnt get his teammates involved enough

same shyt

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

You weren't being objective. You were lying.

The entire atmosphere in sports has ramped up since MJ left.

You were much more able to control the narrative during his time.

What the hell are you talking about?

Lying!? About what? All I said was Jordan faced scrutiny too. I never said who dealt with more scrutiny or who dealt with less scrutiny.

All I said was if you weren't around for BOTH eras then you can't make a truly objective statement. Then I asked the guy if he was around for both eras.

On top of that, I even said that I WASN'T PAYING ATTENTION DURING BOTH PERIODS SO I WILL NOT COMMENT. I didn't even pick sides in the argument?

So do me a favor and tell me what part is the lie.

 

[NYC Rebel]

What the hell are you talking about?

Lying!? About what? All I said was Jordan faced scrutiny too. I never said who dealt with more scrutiny or who dealt with less scrutiny.

All I said was if you weren't around for BOTH eras then you can't make a truly objective statement. Then I asked the guy if he was around for both eras.

On top of that, I even said that I WASN'T PAYING ATTENTION DURING BOTH PERIODS SO I WILL NOT COMMENT. I didn't even pick sides in the argument?

So do me a favor and tell me what part is the lie.

Dog.....we were clearly talking about AS MUCH SCRUTINY as LJ and todays players and here you are playing fallback mode dumbing it down saying MJ "faced scrutiny too"

fukk outta here with your goalpost moving. My focus was on HOW MUCH MORE. You LIED trying to make the.VOLUME of their scrutiny equals.

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

Dog.....we were clearly talking about AS MUCH SCRUTINY as LJ and todays players and here you are playing fallback mode dumbing it down saying MJ "faced scrutiny too"

fukk outta here with your goalpost moving. My focus was on HOW MUCH MORE. You LIED trying to make the.VOLUME of their scrutiny equals.

You must be half retarded. Quote me then. Quote where me where I said MJ got MORE scrutiny...

talking about Im "goal post moving" fukk otta here you fukk boy.

Quote me where I took a side or keep it moving fakkit.

 

[NYC Rebel]

You must be half retarded. Quote me then. Quote where me where I said MJ got MORE scrutiny...

talking about Im "goal post moving" fukk otta here you fukk boy.

Quote me where I took a side or keep it moving fakkit.

YOU responded to John McElroy comment.....BOLDING this statement

I think LeBron has dealt with 100x the scrutiny Mike had to deal with and still broke through at a younger age. In fact, he's done everything at a younger age.

YOU responded to him saying Lebron received ten times more scrutiny by posting this bullshyt.

Were you around when Jordan was playing because I wasn't. If you weren't around to see what the reporters were saying, coaches, players, ect. you cant say who had more scrutiny. People always talk nice after the player retires so we can't really tell how tough MJ had it.

Remember Jordan's "Alcoholism" scandal, his "Gambling" scandal, his "Scoring champs don't win titles", "Is he a great player but bad team mate", ect.

First you say:

you cant say who had more scrutiny.

NOW you're falling back saying "I never said MJ got more..

Then why the fukk were you responding to the person that said LJ got more then, faqqot?

I said LJ got more and that you're attempting to say the volume behind MJ scrutiny was just as loud. That is a complete LIE!!



fukk outta here with your moving the goal post bullshyt.

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

YOU responded to John McElroy comment.....BOLDING this statement

So the fukk WHAT? How does that negate my comment?

YOU responded to him saying Lebron received ten times more scrutiny by posting this bullshyt.

WHERE DID I SAY 10X MORE!?!?!? Bold it!!!!!! Specifically the part that says TEN.

NOW you're falling back saying "I never said MJ got more..

Then why the fukk were you responding to the person that said LJ got more then, faqqot?

BECAUSE I DIDN'T!!!

I said the you can't say who got more scrutiny unless you were paid attention to both eras. So how does that mean I am picking MJ as having more scrutiny?

Then why the fukk were you responding to the person that said LJ got more then, faqqot?

Who the fukk cares who I respond to? It doesn't change what I said. You have to have seen both eras to make an objective opinion.

I said LJ got more and that you're attempting to say the volume behind MJ scrutiny was just as loud. That is a complete LIE!!

Please quote where I said "MJ scrutiny was just as loud."!!! Your reading comprehension is fukking ridiculously bad.

How does "you cant say who had more scrutiny." = MJ got more scrutiny? Are you serious...nah, you're trolling. You had me for a second. I refused to believe you're THAT stupid. You had 1 too many concussions. Get ya broke brain checked.

If you're not trolling then Im done. Im not arguing with dikkheads.

 

[NYC Rebel]

So the fukk WHAT? How does that negate my comment?



WHERE DID I SAY 10X MORE!?!?!? Bold it!!!!!! Specifically the part that says TEN.



BECAUSE I DIDN'T!!!

I said the you can't say who got more scrutiny unless you were paid attention to both eras. So how does that mean I am picking MJ as having more scrutiny?



Who the fukk cares who I respond to? It doesn't change what I said. You have to have seen both eras to make an objective opinion.



Please quote where I said "MJ scrutiny was just as loud."!!! Your reading comprehension is fukking ridiculously bad.

How does "you cant say who had more scrutiny." = MJ got more scrutiny? Are you serious...nah, you're trolling. You had me for a second. I refused to believe you're THAT stupid. You had 1 too many concussions. Get ya broke brain checked.

If you're not trolling then Im done. Im not arguing with dikkheads.

Horrible posting.

You clearly attempted to make the era of scrutiny MJ lived in akin to the current day scrutiny facing today's athletes.

Technology has empowered fools like yourself to have an opinion and have a say in the narrative.

To even attempt to put the past in the same light, using the age card that you cant use on me is not only protecting a lie, it goes outright against the advances in sports media we've seen post MJ.

You're being a complete lying a$$hole putting yesterday's scrutiny shoulder to shoulder with today's. the. You have the nerve to try to discredit someone for not being there, as if they had to be there to know that scrutiny was ten times less back then to now. OH....THEY CAN'T SAY THAT!!!

fukk outta here with your bullshyt. You CLEARLY tried to put scrutiny back then as one and the same as today by the default of using the word.

Just dumb.


YOU





ARE








LYING