Something that can't be factually proven can't be called a denial. Michael and LeBrob never played in the same NBA. So anyone's opinion on which they deem greater is just that, an opinion. They didn't play at the same time, against each other, or versus the same competition...
Lest I could say all you mf's who say Mike is greater are in denial. Which, I guess I could
It's funny yall count the Bubble ring as a half a ring, you lame inconsistent mf's wouldn't say that if Giannis or Kawhi or Jimmy or anybody else won it. Everybody and everybody's team had the same opportunity to win that title...
But because LeBron won it, it don't count
The math that matters is that he's a 4x champion; those 4 chips he won two as a back-to-back repeat champ; won 3 rings in a 5 year span; and won 4 rings in a 9-year span, like the 00s Spurs. He's the only 1-man dynasty in the history of the NBA, winning followed him, not the other way around. He didn't need to be taught a system. He made coaches champions who have struggled to do shyt without him---->unlike your GOAT, who only won with one coach, one playstyle philosophy, one wingman. His coach just kept winning championships regardless of who his lead guy was. Sounds like Mike wasn't that important...
LeBron brought rings to nikkas who never won anything before or after him. He made Wade a multiple time champion, we all know Wade wasn't ever getting another ring without LeBron, and we know this because it never happened...
You mf's ain't gotta like him, and yall can clown how weird this late stage of his career is going. But we all know that in his heyday, primarily before he joined LA, he has an argument as the greatest player ever, multiple legendary playoff runs front to back, multiple legendary Finals games and series. Ain't shyt that's gone on since he's been in LA impacting him negatively, specifically not this shytshow of a franchise that has been lost for years before he got there, and finally brought them another title and restored them to relevancy...