Lebron is now the all time leading scorer in playoff history passing MJ :mjcry:

Randoug

Superstar
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
4,230
Reputation
1,160
Daps
21,344
kobe.png



KOBE WAS NEVER A SIDEKICK .. FALL BACK

Shaq was one of the lead scorers AND the primary defender/Shot blocker on that team..He averaged almost the same in points while having the most defensive boards and blocks. He was no doubt THE MAN on that team.. This just proves most Kobe stans didn't observe the game but rather observed Kobe.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,851
Daps
204,038
Reppin
the ether
Anybody saying LeBron faced tougher competition than Kobe is a liar. Point blank.

No one said "Lebron faced tougher competition than Kobe".


One argument I made is that Lebron faced better DEFENSES than Kobe. And that is a fact. No one in this thread has even tried to list all the career-full of fantastic defenses that Kobe faced...because they CAN'T.

Lebron faced four Boston, four Chicago, four Indiana, three Detroit, three San Antonio, two Golden State. That's 20 series right there, and those teams were elite defensively for at least 16-17 of them. Even the 2011 Mavs and 2015 Hawks were upper-level defenses those years.

What's Kobe's list? You can't make one that compares. It's not there. He faced good Spurs defenses about five times, Detroit once, Boston twice, and....?



The second argument is that Lebron LED his team to wins against more great teams that Kobe LED his team too. Again, you can't argue that.

Lebron's teams took out the 56-win 2011 Celtics, the 62-win 2011 Bulls, the 58-win 2012 Thunder (pro-rated), the 56-win 2013 Pacers, the 58-win 2013 Spurs, the 61-win 2015 Hawks, the 56-win 2016 Raptors, and the 73-win 2016 Warriors.

That's EIGHT 55-win teams, and THREE sixty-win teams. Of those, at least the Bulls, the Thunder, the Spurs, and the Warriors were fantastic all-time teams.

Meanwhile, Kobe led his team to victory against TWO 55-win teams total, and one of those were the 56-win Spurs who had their leading scorer (Ginobli) get hurt and hobble uselessly the whole series. The other was the 59-win Magic. And that's it.

You can't come up with a list of great teams that Kobe has led his team to victory to in the playoffs. Sorry, but it just not there. You always end up back at Shaq.:yeshrug:
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
57,969
Reputation
-19,854
Daps
77,175
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Shaq was one of the lead scorers AND the primary defender/Shot blocker on that team..He averaged almost the same in points while having the most defensive boards and blocks. He was no doubt THE MAN on that team.. This just proves most Kobe stans didn't observe the game but rather observed Kobe.

THE FUCC ARE U TALKIN ABOUT, KOBE WAS A 1ST TEAM ALL-DEFENDER, EASILY A SUPERIOR DEFENDER TO SHAQ

LMFAO @ THIS NONSENSE AND THE WEIRD ROBOT LAWYER ACTUALLY DAPPED THIS POST
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,851
Daps
204,038
Reppin
the ether
nikka didnt bury shyt....he had to erase literally 6 years of playoff experience from Kobe to even make it somewhat comparable, and even then....he tries to make a case that the East has been close to the West as far as competitiveness. Anyone that watches basketball knows thats FAR from the truth.

Even if you forget Shaq, Kobe played 6+ more seasons than Lebron. Act like you can just ignore that when comparing career totals brehs.


And the ring-counting, “it’s all about the W’s” shyt becomes the most illogical, stupid argument when you start adding second-fiddle credit.

Either the #1 guy totally determines whether you win and lose, and thus ring-counting and series wins are the sole measure of greatness for #1's

Or the #2 guy and other teammates matter, so THE #1 GUY CANNOT BE EVALUATED BY RINGS ALONE BECAUSE IT DEPENDS ON HIS TEAMMATES.

You can't get past that logic, all you can do is say something stupid and blow it off. But it's either option a or option b, it can't be both.



So i guess kobe was just sitting around watching nickelodeon when shaq was there, right?


how the fukk you gonna count lockout estimates for lebron and discredit shyt that Kobe actually did?

No, Kobe contributed, but it's dumb as fukk to say "Kobe beat this many 50-win teams!" and compare that number head-to-head to other players when he wasn't even the best player on his own team for most of those series.

You have a graphic where beating the 73 win Warriors is the same as beating the 50-win Nuggets, and winning the Finals against an elite 47-19 Thunder team doesn't count at all. Where being the best player on a shyt team that takes the 66-win Celtics to 7 counts for nothing, but being the 2nd-best player against a completely outmatched Nets team is worth everything. It was an idiot graphic years ago when it wasn't even accurate then, and it keeps getting off by more and stupider every year.



and lebron played better defenses? you list the spurs like Kobe ain't make a living off killing them nikkas.


The Spurs were just ONE team I listed. Four Boston, four Chicago, four Indiana, three Detroit, three San Antonio, two Golden State. That's 20 series right there, and those teams were elite defensively for at least 16-17 of them. Not to mention a number of other good defensive squads like the 2011 Mavs, 2015 Hawks, and 2016 Raptors.

Sorry, but Kobe just doesn't have as many series against elite defenses as Lebron. You want me to list them by ranking? You don't, because it ain't fukking close.




So you're blaming Kobe for losing..............in the same exact time period that you also claim it wasn't Kobe's team and Shaq ran the squad?

I didn't "blame Kobe for losing". Someone said Kobe couldn't score as much when he came into the league because the teams were tougher then, and I pointed out that the squads that played them tough weren't all that tough. I didn't say one word that blamed Kobe for the losses. We weren't even talking about wins and losses, we were talking about the quality of the teams Kobe was trying to score against.



I fall into the trap sometimes of course, but how can y'all same motherfukkers argue the EXACT SAME shyt (meaningless at that) day after day, year after year?


Go outside and take a jog or something

You do got that right. Kobestans been posting the same fukking graphic since 2015, and every time anything about Lebron comes up, they throw that graphic up there again when it's as irrelevant as fukk, was wrong then and it keeps getting more wrong every year.



Now watch four more posters ignore every argument to deflect more about me having too many receipts against them, like that a bad thing. :troll:
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,805
He says this yet multiple basketball players have chosen Kobe over LeBron.

I guess VegasCac knows more about basketball watching from his mom's living room than guys on the court playing.

You're delusional and you need help. Point on the doll where Lebron touched you faggit
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
57,969
Reputation
-19,854
Daps
77,175
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
No one said "Lebron faced tougher competition than Kobe".


One argument I made is that Lebron faced better DEFENSES than Kobe. And that is a fact. No one in this thread has even tried to list all the career-full of fantastic defenses that Kobe faced...because they CAN'T.

Lebron faced four Boston, four Chicago, four Indiana, three Detroit, three San Antonio, two Golden State. That's 20 series right there, and those teams were elite defensively for at least 16-17 of them. Even the 2011 Mavs and 2015 Hawks were upper-level defenses those years.

What's Kobe's list? You can't make one that compares. It's not there. He faced good Spurs defenses about five times, Detroit once, Boston twice, and....?



The second argument is that Lebron LED his team to wins against more great teams that Kobe LED his team too. Again, you can't argue that.

Lebron's teams took out the 56-win 2011 Celtics, the 62-win 2011 Bulls, the 58-win 2012 Thunder (pro-rated), the 56-win 2013 Pacers, the 58-win 2013 Spurs, the 61-win 2015 Hawks, the 56-win 2016 Raptors, and the 73-win 2016 Warriors.

That's EIGHT 55-win teams, and THREE sixty-win teams. Of those, at least the Bulls, the Thunder, the Spurs, and the Warriors were fantastic all-time teams.

Meanwhile, Kobe led his team to victory against TWO 55-win teams total, and one of those were the 56-win Spurs who had their leading scorer (Ginobli) get hurt and hobble uselessly the whole series. The other was the 59-win Magic. And that's it.

You can't come up with a list of great teams that Kobe has led his team to victory to in the playoffs. Sorry, but it just not there. You always end up back at Shaq.:yeshrug:


KOBE LED ON THE SHAQ TEAMS MORE THAN LEBRON DID ON HIS ALLSTAR SQUADS .. AND MISS ME WIT THE PARAGRAPGS OF ANALYTICAL BREAK DOWNS, ROBO. SOME OF US HAVE SOULS AND ACTUALLY WATCHED THE GAMES IN REAL TIME AS OPPOSED TO JUST READING BOX SCORES AND COMPILING A BUNCHA NUMBERS
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
57,969
Reputation
-19,854
Daps
77,175
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Even if you forget Shaq, Kobe played 6+ more seasons than Lebron. Act like you can just ignore that when comparing career totals brehs.


And the ring-counting, “it’s all about the W’s” shyt becomes the most illogical, stupid argument when you start adding second-fiddle credit.

Either the #1 guy totally determines whether you win and lose, and thus ring-counting and series wins are the sole measure of greatness for #1's

Or the #2 guy and other teammates matter, so THE #1 GUY CANNOT BE EVALUATED BY RINGS ALONE BECAUSE IT DEPENDS ON HIS TEAMMATES.

You can't get past that logic, all you can do is say something stupid and blow it off. But it's either option a or option b, it can't be both.





No, Kobe contributed, but it's dumb as fukk to say "Kobe beat this many 50-win teams!" and compare that number head-to-head to other players when he wasn't even the best player on his own team for most of those series.

You have a graphic where beating the 73 win Warriors is the same as beating the 50-win Nuggets, and winning the Finals against an elite 47-19 Thunder team doesn't count at all. Where being the best player on a shyt team that takes the 66-win Celtics to 7 counts for nothing, but being the 2nd-best player against a completely outmatched Nets team is worth everything. It was an idiot graphic years ago when it wasn't even accurate then, and it keeps getting off by more and stupider every year.






The Spurs were just ONE team I listed. Four Boston, four Chicago, four Indiana, three Detroit, three San Antonio, two Golden State. That's 20 series right there, and those teams were elite defensively for at least 16-17 of them. Not to mention a number of other good defensive squads like the 2011 Mavs, 2015 Hawks, and 2016 Raptors.

Sorry, but Kobe just doesn't have as many series against elite defenses as Lebron. You want me to list them by ranking? You don't, because it ain't fukking close.






I didn't "blame Kobe for losing". Someone said Kobe couldn't score as much when he came into the league because the teams were tougher then, and I pointed out that the squads that played them tough weren't all that tough. I didn't say one word that blamed Kobe for the losses. We weren't even talking about wins and losses, we were talking about the quality of the teams Kobe was trying to score against.





You do got that right. Kobestans been posting the same fukking graphic since 2015, and every time anything about Lebron comes up, they throw that graphic up there again when it's as irrelevant as fukk, was wrong then and it keeps getting more wrong every year.



Now watch four more posters ignore every argument to deflect more about me having too many receipts against them, like that a bad thing. :troll:


NOT READING THIS ENTIRE ESSAY, BUT IN THE OPENING SENTENCE ALONE, U SAY KOBE PLAYED 6 MORE SEASONS


AND HOW MANY OF THOSE SEASONS WERE NOT EVEN PLAYOFF YEARS DUE TO HIM PLAYIN ON D-LEAGUE TEAMS/POST ACHILLES TEAR

:jbhmm:

NUMBERS CAN BE MANIPULATED TO SHOW ANYTHIN.. ITS ALL ABOUT CONTEXT
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,349
Reputation
575
Daps
16,077
THE FUCC ARE U TALKIN ABOUT, KOBE WAS A 1ST TEAM ALL-DEFENDER, EASILY A SUPERIOR DEFENDER TO SHAQ

LMFAO @ THIS NONSENSE AND THE WEIRD ROBOT LAWYER ACTUALLY DAPPED THIS POST


Kobe played good defense for about 2 seasons, then he turned into a gambler. He did the same thing westbrook is doing now.... he started off playing high energy defense and looking like a capable defender then he started focusing on offense and received all defense selections based on a false reputation. Even during Kobe's decent defense seasons, he played tight against the player he was covering because he could rely on shaq to clog the paint if the player blew past. When Kobe didn't have an interior defender backing him up, his opponents lit him up.

Fact is, it's not easy to be an elite defender and offensive focal point as a guard/sf. Jordan's DPOY season is an aberration. Lebron started slacking on D in his Miami years and still does most of the time. Kawhi's greater burden on offense this year has him saving more energy on defense.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
57,969
Reputation
-19,854
Daps
77,175
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Kobe played good defense for about 2 seasons, then he turned into a gambler. He did the same thing westbrook is doing now.... he started off playing high energy defense and looking like a capable defender then he started focusing on offense and received all defense selections based on a false reputation. Even during Kobe's decent defense seasons, he played tight against the player he was covering because he could rely on shaq to clog the paint if the player blew past. When Kobe didn't have an interior defender backing him up, his opponents lit him up.

Fact is, it's not easy to be an elite defender and offensive focal point as a guard/sf. Jordan's DPOY season is an aberration. Lebron started slacking on D in his Miami years and still does most of the time. Kawhi's greater burden on offense this year has him saving more energy on defense.
YOU ARE RIGHT THAT KOBE STARTED SLACKIN ON D, BUT THIS WAS WAY LATER.. HE WAS ALWAYS A LOCKDOWN PERIMETER DEFENDER IN THE THREEPEAT YEARS.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,349
Reputation
575
Daps
16,077
YOU ARE RIGHT THAT KOBE STARTED SLACKIN ON D, BUT THIS WAS WAY LATER.. HE WAS ALWAYS A LOCKDOWN PERIMETER DEFENDER IN THE THREEPEAT YEARS.

I don't think that era had lockdown defenders. Bruce Bowen maybe? Look at the lockdown perimeter defenders that came around after the 3 peat years such as Artest, Bradley, Beverley, Tony Allen, Kawhi. The only perimeter defender in the same class as the ones I listed is probably Pippen. Maybe Jordan, maybe Lebron during his last 2 seasons before he went to Miami. The best perimeter defender during the 3 peat era was probably KG.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
57,969
Reputation
-19,854
Daps
77,175
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
I don't think that era had lockdown defenders. Bruce Bowen maybe? Look at the lockdown perimeter defenders that came around after the 3 peat years such as Artest, Bradley, Beverley, Tony Allen, Kawhi. The only perimeter defender in the same class as the ones I listed is probably Pippen. Maybe Jordan, maybe Lebron during his last 2 seasons before he went to Miami. The best perimeter defender during the 3 peat era was probably KG.

GARNETT WAS MORE OF A POST DEFENDER .. KOBES D WAS VITAL TO THE LAKERS THREEPEAT. KOBE WAS A BETTER DEFENDER THAN BRUCE BOWEN IN THEM YEARS .. EVEN GOT MORE VOTES ON THE ALL-D TEAMS. THATS BEFORE HE WAS COASTIN ON REP.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,349
Reputation
575
Daps
16,077
GARNETT WAS MORE OF A POST DEFENDER .. KOBES D WAS VITAL TO THE LAKERS THREEPEAT. KOBE WAS A BETTER DEFENDER THAN BRUCE BOWEN IN THEM YEARS .. EVEN GOT MORE VOTES ON THE ALL-D TEAMS. THATS BEFORE HE WAS COASTIN ON REP.

My point is that there were no defenders that were doing what Kawhi did the last two seasons. Everybody got lit up on the perimeter, it was strong team defenses with interior anchors that got anywhere. Timmy, KG, and Shaq were dominating MVP's for a reason in that era. KG was the prototype for the modern defense SF/PF. At the guard positions, defensive utility was extremely low, especially with rules designed to allow Guards to score.
 
Top