Ozymandeas
Veteran
Kobe’s “second fiddle” rings were more earned and way more impactful than Bron’s super team rings as “the number 1” and all KDs rings as “1a/1b” to Steph. These nikkas hate competition.
The ridiculous part about it is they’re criticizing ring culture and how players are devalued when they spent the last 15 years devaluing Kobe for not getting the Finals MVP before
the nerve of these nikkas
Gilbert started his argument calling Kobe a “passenger” then expects us to care about LeBron being criticized when he just did the same thing.According to them, rings only matter if you’re the Finals MVP. Shaq got them, fine but post-Shaq, Kobe went to three championships and won two. Shaq did NOTHING using those same rules. Why didn’t he start another dynasty as the main guy? Kobe's three rings (2000, 2001, 2002) gets discarded but for some reason, we’re supposed to care about Shaq’s ring in 2006.
Last edited:



