Lets discuss problems with the "resurrection" story

[noon]

Go back to post 28.

Man, you are lost.​

Wow, you're right. You think "something odd happened to Jesus". You sure have talked a lot of shyt and had lengthy debates with folk based such an on-the-fence statement.

Not sure if that makes you even weirder dude.

 

[Type Username Here]

Wow, you're right. You think "something odd happened to Jesus". You sure have talked a lot of shyt and had lengthy debates with folk based such an on-the-fence statement.

Not sure if that makes you even weirder dude.

He's a Christian masquerading as a scholar. If you go through his post history, he only defends Christianity and makes a clear effort to only apply twisting of logic towards that specific religion. He's quite rigorous in his dismantling of other religions and beliefs, which I am quick to say he does well. His faith ultimately makes him a victim of the same thing he usually rails against.

For example, he has yet to address why we shouldn't apply his same logic about eyewitness, written testimony, and holy scripture towards Mohammed and Joseph Smith (or anything predating Christ). According to his logic, both Islam and Mormonism are also true and all their claims are facts, thus invalidating Christianity.

 

[noon]

Plus he centrally aligns all his posts. That's a definite sign of someone a little bit off.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Wow, you're right. You think "something odd happened to Jesus". You sure have talked a lot of shyt and had lengthy debates with folk based such an on-the-fence statement.

Everyone in this thread had an opportunity to actually read through the responses before putting their $.02 in. I don't 'talk shyt' unless attacked, but I will always defend my view.​

 

[noon]

Everyone in this thread had an opportunity to actually read through the responses before putting their $.02 in. I don't 'talk shyt' unless attacked, but I will always defend my view.​

Your view that "something odd happened to Jesus"? Still, waaay too much effort guy for such a non-opinion.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

He's a Christian masquerading as a scholar.

No and this is the last time I'm going to remind you since you seem to have some brain-dysfunction: I am a Theological Noncognitivist. Have been for over 30 years. My family is full of Born-Again Christians. I study this to understand what they believe. Don't keep throwing out false assertions about me. I'm perfectly capable of answering questions about my stance when asked. If you are still unclear about what my theological stance is, read through this......

The Argument From Non-Cognitivism

I hope I don't have to correct you again. I shouldn't have to. As I stated, this information is available all over the place so you have no excuse to be as ignorant of it as you are.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Your view that "something odd happened to Jesus"? Still, waaay too much effort guy for such a non-opinion.

Not at all considering the responses. The effort was from those debating non-issues. And you're STILL wrong.

Wow.
​

 

[noon]

Not at all considering the responses. The effort was from those debating non-issues. And you're STILL wrong.

Wow.
​

Ok. I just took those words from the post you referred me to but whatever. The rest was my observation. This thread is mostly you.

 

[Type Username Here]

No and this is the last time I'm going to remind you since you seem to have some brain-dysfunction: I am a Theological Noncognitivist. Have been for over 30 years. My family is full of Born-Again Christians. I study this to understand what they believe. Don't keep throwing out false assertions about me. I'm perfectly capable of answering questions about my stance when asked. If you are still unclear about what my theological stance is, read through this......

The Argument From Non-Cognitivism

​

Why do you selectively only apply twisting of logic towards Christianity and not other religions? You seem to challenge the claims made by other religions very rigorously throughout our times here. Someone can't help but see this bias.

If I were to take the arguments you made here as a well constructed argument, and applied it to Mohammed and Islam, wouldn't it validate Islamic claims about Jesus as well? Now you have two claims, on opposing ends, that have been validated by the logic you used here.

You need to apply Occam's razor here. You're arguing for supernatural (or something "odd") when the most plausible case is that it was fabricated or an oral myth gone amok.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Ok. I just took those words from the post you referred me to but whatever. The rest was my observation. This thread is mostly you.

Yeah, me getting attacked/flamed by people that didn't understand what I was arguing........and still don't.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Why do you selectively only apply twisting of logic towards Christianity and not other religions?

I'm not 'selectively' applying 'twisted logic' to Christianity. I'm applying historical grammatical criticism to the text of the Bible/Apochrypha.

This is why you're always wrong about what I'm arguing. You don't know how to read the text aside from one way and any other would be completely alien to you unless you spent some effort learning how.​

 

[noon]

Yeah, me getting attacked/flamed by people that didn't understand what I was arguing........and still don't.​

So what am I 'STILL wrong' about? Your view about Jesus or you spending a lot of time defending it?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

So what am I 'STILL wrong' about? Your view about Jesus or you spending a lot of time defending it?

Now? Both.
​

 

[noon]

Now? Both.
​

So the words that I copy and pasted from yourself are wrong and the observation that you have spent a lot of time arguing in this thread despite you having confirmed and the fact that everyone else can freely go and see your name and lengthy posts in here it is also wrong?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

So the words that I copy and pasted from yourself are wrong

No, everything else is.​