SupaHotIce
All Star
Screaming because they're on fire = "chilling and watching"
Are they supposed to attack when they're engulfed in flames?![]()
Were they in flames the entire time?
Screaming because they're on fire = "chilling and watching"
Are they supposed to attack when they're engulfed in flames?![]()
Nah I said w3 has no oomphWitcher 3 combat has oomph to it? Witcher 3 is a generic Batman
OK. I'm just letting you know how silly it sounds. It's like saying "as a fan of Soul Calibur, I was disappointed with Tekken 5"now you done moved the goalpoasts to some whole other shyt.
fine, it isn't a "souls' game.
Its still not as good as any of the "souls' games, and as a fan of the series I was disappointed with it.
. I started out with the cane, and I never liked the hammer or the holy blade. I think there is plenty of variety.You mean art style?
I gotta disagree the art style was too dark and repetitive. None of the areas really stood out cause they all were so similar. There was no feelings of wonder like the first time walking into Anor Londo or Blightown. The bosses were not very memorable for the same reason. They were too similar, most of the bosses were just huge ugly beasts that you just swing at their ankles and dodge their attacks.
The weapons were cool, but once I got the kirkhammer I NEVER used another weapon and never had a reason to.
This game was serverely lacking in variety in all aspects
Witcher is Larry. They need to consult the asians.Nah I said w3 has no oomph