The north arguably has the GOAT architecture in the United States. Sprawled cities are typically viewed as ugly by everyone.
As far as scenery goes you must be talking about the Midwest portion of the north cause you aren’t talking about the NE.
Yeah it’s only a handful of cities in the South that got interesting architecture. Hell I’d even go as far as saying some of the most dilapidated cities you can think of in “The North” got more attractive looking architecture than the most dilapidated cities in the South. For example, who got more attractive looking architecture despite having a decent number of areas that look derelict asf:
Buffalo, NY or Jackson, MS?
Baltimore, MD or Memphis, TN?
Pittsburgh, PA or Jacksonville, FL?
And I know good and damn well he ain’t talking about no damn “North looks so ugly” in terms of scenery

From the almost uninterrupted stretch of coastline that transitions from the sandy beaches of Maryland to the rocky, lighthouse-dotted shoreline of Maine.....To the beautiful apple country of the Hudson Valley and the wineries of Northern Virginia....To New England’s iconic autumn and winter landscapes....To the incredible majesty of the Chesapeake Bay....Pennsylvania by itself got one of the most gorgeous topographies and geographies in the country and Maryland in particular got practically every single natural biome that this country got except for tropical rainforests, deserts, open plains, and glacial/alpine areas (it’s a reason MD is called America In Miniature)....A lot of these steel, brick, and stone bridges that dot the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic add to the scenery as well....Both North and South share the Appalachians....Etc., etc.
He would have a point about the Lower Midwest since much of that shyt is very flat and rarely changes elevation. However, the Upper Midwest and some of the Great Plains states have some very interesting topography and geography that rivals almost anything that’s on the East Coast and the South.