You and your butt buddy can dap each other up and join together in trying to misrepresent what I said, but there's nothing in either of those posts that is outrageous or bullshyt. Seruously, the false spin is not only clearly disingenuous it's mentally weak. Don't misrepresent one person's arguement then try to put that false argument on "nikkas" just so that you can make a counter arguement. I didn't say anything about those Bulls centers containing Olajuwon. Evidently you built that strawman argument because you aren't smart enough to counter the arguement hat I actually made.
then Ol boy gravity started going HAM with the bullshyt:
Let's look back at Hakeem's 95' playoff Run
- Thread starter Street Knowledge
- Start date
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
You've been teling yourself that you're smarter than everyone else for a minute when your own words make you look stupid.
Gravity said:
And when I ask you moreso than the D-Rob's, Ewings and Shaqs which made him work on both ends of the court you fall back to vague "probably"
.fukk outta here. You can't announce that shyt then fall back when pressed to speak further and back your argument with something of merit.
Your lack of intelligence has nothing to do with me. Your mental deficiencies are all about you. When you have to misrepresent and straight up lie about what someone has said and is saying, that means that you aren't that bright. This should be a simple and easy discussion with people who are capable of agreeing to disagree. You don't seem capable of that. You don't even seem capable of having an intelligent discussion period. I haven't fallen back on anything, and I've never used the word "probably" in regards to my opinion on Hakeem vs those Bulls centers. You're just a liar, straight up and down. I used words like "maybe" in regards to my opinion, and I made it a point to use those kind of words. I was just expressing an opinion.
You've been teling yourself that you're smarter than everyone else for a minute when your own words make you look stupid.
And when I ask you moreso than the D-Rob's, Ewings and Shaqs which made him work on both ends of the court you fall back to vague "probably"
fukk outta here. You can't announce that shyt then fall back when pressed to speak further and back your argument with something of merit.
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
Ok....you used the word "Possibly"
So what have you used to push YOUR argument that "the Bulls had the size and depth to make him work hard for everything that he would get? (your words)" moreso than mines and others argument that if the D-Rob's, Ewings and Shaqa who made him work on both ends of the court couldn't do it, how could the Bulls?
You have yet to answer that.
Remember that Taco Bell
One on One Hakeem vs Shaq
Shaq had a fake injure
He knew better
Hakeem was the one who pulled out with a back injury.
ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
Jordan through 90-93 >>
Hakeem in his prime was amazing and more so than anybody currently in the NBA and in the last 9 years.
I put Shaq in his peak was neck to neck with Hakeem but might give the edge to Shaq because of the 3 peat. Hakeem faced tougher teams tho. The 02 Nets and 2000 Pacers were weak
holidayinn21
:SmugMoneyMike:
ok. you didn't use the word contain. happy? you arguing semantics now?
you made a baseless assumption, got called out, then started goal post-moving like a muthafukka, got called out again, then you resort to questioning a nikkas intelligence.
straight lame.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
its true, and if it aint McHale then still McHale in the post>>>Hakeem
McHale had the most post moves most of us have ever seen.
he is the originator of the "Torture Chamber"
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn't speaking in comparison. I never said that the Bulls centers would make Hakeem work harder than he had to work vs Robinson, Ewing, and whoever else. Basketball is a team game, not a 1on1 game. The matchup would've been the Rockets vs the Bulls, not Hakeem vs those 4 Bulls centers. Hakeem could've played as well as he played vs Ewing, Shaq, and Robinson and the Bulls might've still beaten the Rockets in a 7 game series. Again bruh, whether or not those Bulls center would've been successful in wearing Hakeem down isnt what my main argument was built on. You just decided to obsess over that for whatever reason. Ive told you over and over that Hakeem would've gotten his, bit I'd pick that Bulls squad simply because I don't think that his supporting cast would've gotten theirs. I don't know why that position is so unreasonable to you.Ok....you used the word "Possibly"
So what have you used to push YOUR argument that "the Bulls had the size and depth to make him work hard for everything that he would get? (your words)" moreso than mines and others argument that if the D-Rob's, Ewings and Shaqa who made him work on both ends of the court couldn't do it, how could the Bulls?
You have yet to answer that.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
I know everyone wants to goto Hakeem to learn from him, but McHale would have been a better coach. (I am saying this when McHale was in between NBA jobs)
He was so technically proficient in the block
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
The point is...I DID. And of course it isn't a 1 on 1 game, but we know that the ONE player in Ewing, Shaq, and D-Rob would make Hakeem have to work both offensively and defensively. The Bulls offered Hakeem nothing to work hard for defensively.
offensively and defensively = two
offensively = one
Let me make it easier for your dumb ass and play your little game. If the "team" which had Ewing, Shaq and D-Rob couldn't slow Hakeem down, how would the Bulls?
You still haven't provided an answer for that besides saying "Possibly."
fukk outta here with the semantics argument. Your argument sucked ass in light of the other teams which had players to make Hakeem work harder didn't suceeed. But somehow the Bulls would!!
ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
I know everyone wants to goto Hakeem to learn from him, but McHale would have been a better coach. (I am saying this when McHale was in between NBA jobs)
He was so technically proficient in the block
McHale had better "techniques" but Hakeem is clearly the better overall post scorer in the paint because of his athleticism.
as a PG would u have Russell Westbrook or Jose Calderon
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
good lord, the way he schooled Ralph Sampson at the 2:00 mark.
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
No he wasn't. McHale had a higher FG% in the low post than Hakeem.
He was the best with your "eye test."
FACTS say otherwise.