I don't give a fukk about who is or who isn't the better player, what I want to know is why are you choosing to shyt on Kyrie now (after one average series), after what he
proved last postseason, and somehow compare it to Harden's play when he hasn't proven a cotdamn thing in a postseason environment?
Kyrie hasn't even MADE it to the playoffs as the number one option on his team. He has a GOAT talent that scores more, handles the playmaking, and covers for Kyrie's defensive weakness.
Kyrie proved WHAT? That he's an ungodly talented isolation scorer and the unquestioned assassin on the team? One of the best "big shot makers"? Yeah, sure.
You're sucking Kyrie's dikk when he has one good post season as the second option to Lebron.
Harden's first year as a number one option, he made it to the playoffs and went against Durant, Ibaka, Jackson, and Westbrook. Kyrie couldn't even make the playoffs in a weaker division. His 2nd year, Lilliard hit one of the biggest playoff shots we've ever seen.
His 3rd year, he made it to the WCF against a great team in the Warriors that was MUCH MUCH better team than he had and put up 28.4 PPG (46%) / 6.4 AST / 8 REB with FAR less help than Kyrie had.
Those are better numbers than Kyrie put up against Golden State in the finals but you're giving extra credit to Kyrie (27/4/4) espite the fact that he has Lebron helping him out.