You're also disingenuous because you shyt on Harden for not performing well in the post season as a 1st option when Kyrie couldn't even get into the playoffs as a first option in a weaker conference.
This is how stupid you are, you can't even be halfway honest with your arguments. The Kyrie you're speaking about in that context was aged 19-21:
Kyrie's rookie season (age 19) he was running with the corpse of Jamison (2nd option - age 35), the corpse of Parker (age 36), Casspi, Gee and Varejao (who only played 25 games).
Kyrie's second season (age 20 - only played 59 games) he was running with Waiters' bum ass (2nd option - age 21), TT (age 21), Zeller and Gee.
Kyrie's third season (age 21) he was running with Waiters' bum ass again (2nd option), Deng (only played 40 games), TT, Hawes (who only played 27 games)
You want me to hold a dude that had literally no help who was barely out of school as a 1st option to the same standard as a 27-year-old player who can't break the shackles of his postseason woes because he exhausts every loophole in the system to score points? The same muh'fukka who shat the bed in the Finals as a 3rd option in his first deep playoff run to a player who had one of the most memorable postseason runs in recent memory in his first deep playoff run?
If you wanna cut this "disingenious" bullshyt, why don't we compare how both of them performed at similar ages? Why don't we compare how one raises his game in the postseason, and the other goes in the opposite direction?