Worthless Loser
Blackpilled
Well the point is you're trying to claim that people aren't intelligent enough to solve a question when you don't seem to have your time zones and differences in order.
Let's see how intelligent this board is
- Thread starter CarbonBraddock
- Start date
desjardins
Veteran
nikka said grammar is an opinion
NoChillJones
Banned
How are you going to England..flying..by boat?
It doesnt matter what time it is in England because your going back to the same time zone in America..assuming you instanly to teleport to both its its 5pm CST.
But say you do fly..estimated time to get to London including average drive time to the airport is 8 hrs. If your plane takes off as soon you get there you shold get to London roughly 1 am CST and 7am there time.
If you left immediatly again with the 8 hour theory you arrive back 3pm thier time 9 am CST give or take 10 mins.
It doesnt matter what time it is in England because your going back to the same time zone in America..assuming you instanly to teleport to both its its 5pm CST.
But say you do fly..estimated time to get to London including average drive time to the airport is 8 hrs. If your plane takes off as soon you get there you shold get to London roughly 1 am CST and 7am there time.
If you left immediatly again with the 8 hour theory you arrive back 3pm thier time 9 am CST give or take 10 mins.
Last edited:
And to answer the question:
1) Chicago is GMT -6
2) When you left Chicago it was 6pm in London
3) When you arrived in London it was 11pm in London (assuming you are saying it was a 5 hour flight from Chicago to London, which is highly unrealistic by the way, to keep it real not sure what to assume since your sentence makes no f*cking sense)
4) Assuming you went around and went right back to Chicago (which is at 5PM at your time of departure in London) and it took you 5 hours then it should be 10PM in Chicago when you arrive.
I think the gist of your question is that going forward and backwards has nothing to do with the passing of time. if you go to London and fly back to Chicago 5 hours has passed each way. Again your syntax and grammar is abhorrent, so my assumption is based off a straightforward decoding of your question.
desjardins
Veteran
As far as the question you return to the same starting point with 10 hours of travel, so 9pm in Chicago?
desjardins
Veteran
As far as the question you return to the same starting point with 10 hours of travel, so 9pm in Chicago?
JayBaldacci
All Star
Problem is not solvable until speed of travel is stated
CarbonBraddock
You will be trolled
The same can be said of your question.
you little losers on this board really are funny. i will outscore you on any iq test or test of intelligence that there is. i am goddamn near a genius. but hey, keep typing your little witty rebuttals.
CarbonBraddock
You will be trolled
i said you start in chicago and you go forward in time 5 hours then you go to england, is that too confusing for you or something?
This shyt isn't indicative of intelligence either... One question can't prove shyt
CarbonBraddock
You will be trolled
it is an opinion. a bunch of people made up things that they say are 'rules of grammar' but they are only opinions. they aren't laws of nature. hate when people try to act like grammar police as if moses descended with grammar rules written on stone.nikka said grammar is an opinion
CarbonBraddock
You will be trolled
Yo, That IQ test seriously went to your head.
