Dirty Mcdrawz
Your girl loves em....
I would also like to point out as a black man living in America I smh every time a fellow black man talks about getting a license to carry a concealed firearm. That's shyt is crazy to me.....
I would also like to point out as a black man living in America I smh every time a fellow black man talks about getting a license to carry a concealed firearm. That's shyt is crazy to me.....
@Dirty Mcdrawz 2nd amendment for black men didn't save trayvon or any of the black boys that got shot this year. Infact the black man with guns is the excuse they use to kill you.
So many young black children killed by guns.
Law enforcement officials initially told NBC News that the gunman was Lanza's brother, Ryan, and they had sent out a bulletin to local and federal law enforcement agencies to that effect.
But when authorities went to Ryan's home in Hoboken, N.J., to search it, they unexpectedly found him there.
Ryan told police he was not involved and that his brother has a history of mental health issues and might have had his ID at the time of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, officials said.
The weapons used in the shooting were legally purchased and registered to Nancy Lanza, two law enforcement officials told NBC News.
Two 9mm handguns, one made by Glock and the other by Sig Sauer, were recovered inside the school. An AR-15-type rifle also was found at the scene, but there were conflicting reports Friday night whether it had been used in the shooting.
From NBC NEWS, this will be ignored:
Authorities ID gunman who killed 27 in elementary school massacre - U.S. News
Hmm. Weapons legally purchased by a citizen without any history or issues. The weapons might have been stolen from his mother.
Two handguns definitely used and used in an execution manner (close range). They are not sure if the AR15 was ever used in the shooting.
Then, the most important part, this person was a disturbed individual with known mental issues (and possible learning development) issues.
He didn't walk in and buy these guns like you idiots were claiming. I don't expect any of you to admit you were wrong.
I think this thread is more about gun control in general, not the specifics of this case
but it seems that info could be used in an argument for all out gun control
From NBC NEWS, this will be ignored:
Authorities ID gunman who killed 27 in elementary school massacre - U.S. News
Hmm. Weapons legally purchased by a citizen without any history or issues. The weapons might have been stolen from his mother.
Two handguns definitely used and used in an execution manner (close range). They are not sure if the AR15 was ever used in the shooting.
Then, the most important part, this person was a disturbed individual with known mental issues (and possible learning development) issues.
He didn't walk in and buy these guns like you idiots were claiming. I don't expect any of you to admit you were wrong.
It's funny how people like you just gloss over the part where the killer was described by his own family member as mentally ill and didn't buy the weapons himself.
That doesn't register at all with types like you.
i think of it as america being a skyscraper with 236 year old foundations and framework that has some surface changes and nothing more.
all these scenarios these dudes are using are set up for their success while disregarding the very real scenario of shyt going to shyt. Let's talk about actual gun control and not imaginary movie scenes that you've put yourselves in. Let's talk about how America has the worst gun violence out of any 1st world country. Let's talk about how Switzerland's, Japan's, and United Kingdom gun control model won't work in America because our culture is VERY different. The only model that could probably work in the United States is Canada's.
@ some of the rambo shyt some of you nikkas are talking about
So do you think it was worth it for his mom to have those guns to protect her family? Sadly this is what happens more than the guns actualy being used to protect someone, they are usualy used to kill the wrong person.
If she had some non lethal family protectors her family and 28 other people would still be alive right now.[/QUOTE
The mother was supposed to prevent access to the guns. Obviously the kid wanted a large body count he was getting guns regardless
So do you think it was worth it for his mom to have those guns to protect her family? Sadly this is what happens more than the guns actualy being used to protect someone, they are usualy used to kill the wrong person.
If she had some non lethal family protectors her family and 28 other people would still be alive right now.[/QUOTE
The mother was supposed to prevent access to the guns. Obviously the kid wanted a large body count he was getting guns regardless
Any excuse in the book. Why not just admit that these guns didn't protect this family. Guns don't protect, they kill.