Listen: I'm a Jay Z stay, but I'm. Not subscribing to tidal to stream his music.

Nature's Fury

addicts of drugs not yet synthesized
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
4,110
Reputation
850
Daps
15,551
Why don't you just buy the CD, it's better quality and it's yours to keep forever unlike a streaming service which will only last as long as its trend.

sorry breh, but streaming is here to stay...i love not having to download shyt, transfer it to my device, ect...got an entire library of shyt i wanna here at the click of a button...

i tried all the services, but Tidal is my favorite...i'm on that six month trial somebody hooked it up with a while back, but i was payin out of pocket for it for bout a year...worth it...
 

Jimmy Two-Times™

Coli Mods Catch Me If U Can Forgive Me Imma Ridah™
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
27,997
Reputation
5,910
Daps
61,786
Reppin
Peckham™ Come Get Me!
sorry breh, but streaming is here to stay...i love not having to download shyt, transfer it to my device, ect...got an entire library of shyt i wanna here at the click of a button...

i tried all the services, but Tidal is my favorite...i'm on that six month trial somebody hooked it up with a while back, but i was payin out of pocket for it for bout a year...worth it...
You're an idiot:mindblown:. The CD's (all of those classic albums from the late 80s-late 00s) are like 2$. It takes 10 minutes to copy a disc to lossless. Lossless is better than any MP3 the quality from the disc is the closest you'll ever get sonically to the actual master pressing than a tampered with low quality digital copy that is yours only until you stop paying the subscription fees. You could effectively spend $100 or so on all of the albums you would ever want to hear and still have change for more and you can keep them and listen to them forever. Whereas, with streaming you may spend you could $20 on Tidal for a lossless stream but that would cost you $120 dollars for the year:childplease: instead of buying it physically and keeping it forever and it being cheaper because you won't be paying a monthly fee. You see it doesn't make sense because it's not even easier to stream than copy a CD because there are more steps involved in the process to stream a song than simply copying a CD. It's your money though, I can't enlighten people that can't see what's wrong.:yeshrug:
 

Jimmy Two-Times™

Coli Mods Catch Me If U Can Forgive Me Imma Ridah™
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
27,997
Reputation
5,910
Daps
61,786
Reppin
Peckham™ Come Get Me!
Aint better than that tidal hifi :umad: :ahh:
Lossless is Lossless dipshyt. The CD that your streaming costs cents to a dollar or two including postage and packaging. You keep it forever and you don't pay a monthly fee. How can you call me a fool when your spending $240 a year:mjlol::lolbron: on music you would either never listen to or just to hear the same playlist of songs over and over again. Those songs you could of brought from Amazon, Ebay, or Discogs etc for literally nothing on the wallet compared to signing up to Tidal's premium service. I spend nothing because I own all of the albums I've ever wanted in CD form already and you spend $240 because :huhldup: and Beyonce told you too. You're a sheep.:pachaha::umad: Think about it, it's not easier to simply enter a CD into a computer and copy it into lossless which takes a few minutes than it is to sign up to Tidal and give them $240 is it. You still spend time searching for music and some of it isn't there that you would want to listen to. :umad:


I wanna hear your comeback.:steviej:
 
Last edited:

Nature's Fury

addicts of drugs not yet synthesized
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
4,110
Reputation
850
Daps
15,551
You're an idiot:mindblown:. The CD's (all of those classic albums from the late 80s-late 00s) are like 2$. It takes 10 minutes to copy a disc to lossless. Lossless is better than any MP3 the quality from the disc is the closest you'll ever get sonically to the actual master pressing than a tampered with low quality digital copy that is yours only until you stop paying the subscription fees. You could effectively spend $100 or so on all of the albums you would ever want to hear and still have change for more and you can keep them and listen to them forever. Whereas, with streaming you may spend you could $20 on Tidal for a lossless stream but that would cost you $120 dollars for the year:childplease: instead of buying it physically and keeping it forever and it being cheaper because you won't be paying a monthly fee. You see it doesn't make sense because it's not even easier to stream than copy a CD because there are more steps involved in the process to stream a song than simply copying a CD. It's your money though, I can't enlighten people that can't see what's wrong.:yeshrug:

nikka shut the fukk up...

1. the majority of people don't care about music quality like that so that bullshyt don't matter to the average consumer, only esoteric audiophile nerds...

2. lossless takes up maddd space...only way i'mma be able to have all of them on my phone and available to me at anytime is to--you guessed it---buy maddd cloud space which cost even more money...

3. i wouldn't be able to discover new music as easily...sometimes i hear a random track on tv or something and can easily find it on Tidal and be bumpin the entire album within seconds...not having to go out to the store to cop an album i might not even like just to hear it...

4. new music drops every Friday...fukk i look like buying a bunch of albums i wanna check out but may never listen to again????

5. "it only takes 10 minutes to copy from a cd to lossless"...it takes two seconds to find an album and start bumpin it sucka...

6. i don't care about "owning music" cause i'd never cop half the albums i've listened to...but i like having the option that if i wanna listen to a particular song or maybe give an album another spin, it's there and easy for me to access...
 

WickedGames

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,628
Reputation
-3,765
Daps
48,024
Reppin
UK
Most of his albums on Apple Music (for the UK anyway) it's so confusing dude keeps withdrawing them then putting the shyt back.

Only one I can't see that I would want to listen to is Blueprint rn
 

Jimmy Two-Times™

Coli Mods Catch Me If U Can Forgive Me Imma Ridah™
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
27,997
Reputation
5,910
Daps
61,786
Reppin
Peckham™ Come Get Me!
nikka shut the fukk up...

1. the majority of people don't care about music quality like that so that bullshyt don't matter to the average consumer, only esoteric audiophile nerds...

2. lossless takes up maddd space...only way i'mma be able to have all of them on my phone and available to me at anytime is to--you guessed it---buy maddd cloud space which cost even more money...

3. i wouldn't be able to discover new music as easily...sometimes i hear a random track on tv or something and can easily find it on Tidal and be bumpin the entire album within seconds...not having to go out to the store to cop an album i might not even like just to hear it...

4. new music drops every Friday...fukk i look like buying a bunch of albums i wanna check out but may never listen to again????

5. "it only takes 10 minutes to copy from a cd to lossless"...it takes two seconds to find an album and start bumpin it sucka...

6. i don't care about "owning music" cause i'd never cop half the albums i've listened to...but i like having the option that if i wanna listen to a particular song or maybe give an album another spin, it's there and easy for me to access...

My point is paying $240 just to stream music which isn't yours to keep forever is stupid. You can only listen to the music because you are paying a subscription. For example, their business is based off of consumer loyalty and their average consumer is a naive teenager or young adult who hasn't realised that buying CDs is a one time payment which costs literally nothing and you keep it forever. Therefore, say the consumer spends $240 dollars for one year, their consumer then turns 21, 22, 23 etc. Are you willing to pay for Tidal until the day you die... lets say you cop out of this world at 80 you would have single-handedly from the ages of 20-80 spent $14,400.00? LOL.
The album would of cost $2. Even when CDs were popular I never spent $240 dollars a year on them and I still have them. It's your money. And just because it takes a couple of seconds to search for a new song doesn't make it actually cheaper. You don't pay Google to search for topics do you? It's not even a service you need or one that makes life easier or better. DJ's don't even spend that much on music.
 
Top