Lol @ building Brock for years only for taker to beat him

[Here Comes the Pain]

how many wrestlers could you legit put over lesnar?

For me he should have been untouchable once he broke the streak. Nobody matches the physicality of lesnar in the wwe currently.

Another thing is why did the wwe make taker wait so long to respond to lesnar? Why didn't he do it last mania? Why did undertaker return with dirty tactics even though he's suppose to be a face?

None of it make sense because the wwe stay inconsistent with keeping wrestlers momentum running.

 

[JerseyBoy23]

That 50/50 booking.

 

[Truth200]

 

[Truth200]

Finish SummerSlam without an ending to the main event....

 

[El Cocodrilo]

That 50/50 booking.

Dumbest shyt that WWE ever did... just commit to that 50/50 so hard that you made your unstoppable monster take an L to dude that wrestles once a year

 

[Da King]

And nikkas want to shyt on the Gawd Vince Russo with these trash endings

 

[Truth200]

They need to finish this feud at Hell in a Cell.

Brock can't be wasted at next years WM32 with a 50 year old.

Give us Taker vs Sting at WM32.

 

[Canada Goose]

They need to finish this feud at Hell in a Cell.

Brock can't be wasted at next years WM32 with a 50 year old.

Give us Taker vs Sting at WM32.

They should finish it at Survivor Series IMO, its a "Big 4" PPV and Taker has a lot of history there

 

[Kidd Dibiase]

So is lesnar suppose to never lose?

 

[Truth200]

So is lesnar suppose to never lose?

Lose to who?

 

[puppetmaster]

They should finish it at Survivor Series IMO, its a "Big 4" PPV and Taker has a lot of history there

It'd be Taker's 25th anniversary too. Perfect time to close the books on this "feud"

 

[puppetmaster]

So is lesnar suppose to never lose?

I've yet to see anyone mention WHO on the current roster should beat Brock cleanly and how do they do it.

Gray Gloved Taker was the last guy to be as indestructible as Lesnar currently is and any L he took as that character came with supreme fukkery (Tuesday in Texas, Royal Rumble 1994)

 

[Kill Dat Noize]

Dumbest shyt that WWE ever did... just commit to that 50/50 so hard that you made your unstoppable monster take an L to dude that wrestles once a year

it makes little sense from a wrestling perspective, but sadly i don't think the wwe is looking at it from a wrestling perspective. they stopped focusing on that kinda thing a long time ago.

they're not thinking about protecting the image of their unstoppable monster. they're thinking "hey brock can draw more money with taker than he can with anyone else so let's just get as many matches from those 2 as we can".

the problem here is it shows so little regard for the paying audience. they just keep conning everyone. time and time again they bill a match as one thing and then pull the rug up from underneath.

can john cena beat brock lesnar? pay to find out.
can roman reigns beat brock lesnar? pay to find out.
will brock lesnar finally get payback on seth rollins? pay to find out.
can undertaker get retribution and beat brock lesnar? pay to find out.

these were the 4 biggest angles all last year and not one of them was met with resolution, and yet they just expect people to keep paying and paying.

biggest event of the summer they said. show was a f'n laughingstock.

 

[malbaker86]

I'm numb to all of this to be honest

 

[Kidd Dibiase]

I've yet to see anyone mention WHO on the current roster should beat Brock cleanly and how do they do it.

Gray Gloved Taker was the last guy to be as indestructible as Lesnar currently is and any L he took as that character came with supreme fukkery (Tuesday in Texas, Royal Rumble 1994)

according to folks around here it should be daniel bryan