Lol @ building Brock for years only for taker to beat him

Kidd Dibiase

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
78,317
Reputation
11,042
Daps
214,249
Well that's not going to happen and we already seen Brock dominate Reigns, Cena and Rollins so the question is who?
the problem is with everyone here is they're simply going off of looks alone. this person doesn't "look" they should be able to beat lesnar. this guy doesn't "look" like Lesnar should have a problem with him.

when wrestling since forever has always had someone defy the odds to beat someone who was bigger or stronger. So if Bryan was to beat Lesnar for instance then hey so be it, it makes for a good story regardless of how it "looked".

Lesnar beating Cena the way he did, while impressive has backed them into a hole they can't really get out of because of how Lesnar "looks"
 

Truth200

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
16,449
Reputation
2,589
Daps
32,394
the problem is with everyone here is they're simply going off of looks alone. this person doesn't "look" they should be able to beat lesnar. this guy doesn't "look" like Lesnar should have a problem with him.

when wrestling since forever has always had someone defy the odds to beat someone who was bigger or stronger. So if Bryan was to beat Lesnar for instance then hey so be it, it makes for a good story regardless of how it "looked".

Lesnar beating Cena the way he did, while impressive has backed them into a hole they can't really get out of because of how Lesnar "looks"

Bryan already had a neck injury and a concussion so maybe a new guy will enter the business for Brock to do a job for.

But certainly nobody on the current WWE or NXT rosters.
 

Kidd Dibiase

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
78,317
Reputation
11,042
Daps
214,249
Bryan already had a neck injury and a concussion so maybe a new guy will enter the business for Brock to do a job for.

But certainly nobody on the current WWE or NXT rosters.
if they can be booked properly for a show down with lesnar why not?
 

Kidd Dibiase

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
78,317
Reputation
11,042
Daps
214,249
Who? Name names....
your mind is made up as to there's no one on the roster who should beat lesnar so me naming names doesn't mean anything. its simply a matter of BOOKING someone to be credible enough. Lets not act like Lesnar is this HUGE box office draw for the WWE this has been proven so let not talk "stars"
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
31,554
Reputation
6,656
Daps
128,486
Reppin
The Last of the Outlaws
according to folks around here it should be daniel bryan

I'm one of the few here who was quite ok with that idea when Bryan was red hot, and I posted it should be via submission too because ANYONE can be choked out or leg locked.


They're really booked themselves into a corner in a lotta ways with how strong they've made Bork, as fun as it was watching him throw Cena around it made him invincible basically near to the point that cats are gonna :comeon: at pretty much anyone that beats him especially online it seems.
 

Truth200

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
16,449
Reputation
2,589
Daps
32,394
it makes little sense from a wrestling perspective, but sadly i don't think the wwe is looking at it from a wrestling perspective. they stopped focusing on that kinda thing a long time ago.

they're not thinking about protecting the image of their unstoppable monster. they're thinking "hey brock can draw more money with taker than he can with anyone else so let's just get as many matches from those 2 as we can".

the problem here is it shows so little regard for the paying audience. they just keep conning everyone. time and time again they bill a match as one thing and then pull the rug up from underneath.

can john cena beat brock lesnar? pay to find out.
can roman reigns beat brock lesnar? pay to find out.
will brock lesnar finally get payback on seth rollins? pay to find out.
can undertaker get retribution and beat brock lesnar? pay to find out.

these were the 4 biggest angles all last year and not one of them was met with resolution, and yet they just expect people to keep paying and paying.

biggest event of the summer they said. show was a f'n laughingstock.

When you have a PPV every month it's hard to have your top guys job clean.

Too much money into the characters i guess.

In hindsight how else do you end the match last night, Brock can't lose to a 50 year old.

And if Taker took another L to Brock then you throw this last run for him in WWE away.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-138
Daps
29,239
Reppin
NYC
When you have a PPV every month it's hard to have your top guys job clean.

Too much money into the characters i guess.

In hindsight how else do you end the match last night, Brock can't lose to a 50 year old.

And if Taker took another L to Brock then you throw this last run for him in WWE away.

i wouldn't have booked the match to begin with. it was a lose/lose scenario from the start.
 

Osmosis

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
21,681
Reputation
3,631
Daps
58,857
I've yet to see anyone mention WHO on the current roster should beat Brock cleanly and how do they do it.

Gray Gloved Taker was the last guy to be as indestructible as Lesnar currently is and any L he took as that character came with supreme fukkery (Tuesday in Texas, Royal Rumble 1994)
So 50 plus year old Taker is the guy he should lose to then? This even steven stuff does nothing for anybody.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-138
Daps
29,239
Reppin
NYC
Taker isn't hurt by losing and the company benefits from Brock winning. The match made sense but the result makes no sense.

they just needed an excuse to milk this feud for everything it's worth and extend it to a third match. that's all this was.

if that's not a sad commentary on the state of this company i don't know what is.
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
31,554
Reputation
6,656
Daps
128,486
Reppin
The Last of the Outlaws
So 50 plus year old Taker is the guy he should lose to then? This even steven stuff does nothing for anybody.

Like I said. .. I'm all ears on the alternative WHO and HOW. 50 year old Undertaker cheated, out of desperation. .. That hurts him more than it does Lesnar if we're playing analysts

I'm not like most on this subject talking with my mind made up and arms crossed waiting to be impressed, I'm genuinely asking how do you book around this monster they've created "fair and square"
 
Top