Lord Jamar is over extending his welcome...

Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
545
Reputation
-20
Daps
554
It should be controversial to be a racist what the fuxk are you talking about!?
he's not being a racist though, he just said that outside forces are using hip hop as a vehicle to feminize black youth. I really think that men in general are being feminized in order to have a more submissive populous. But I have never had cable in my life so when I see these things they actually appear highly unordinary
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
545
Reputation
-20
Daps
554
No, it's the shyt nikkas say when we continually hear these overtly pro black revolutionaries complain about living in the western world like they have to stay here. They can leave and be an environment that is more close to their overall pov. Lord Jamar been on this Brand Nubian shyt for how long? This obviously isn't the place for that. Now your relevance is dependent on piggybacking a cac asking you the same spin questions that contribute to the watering down of the culture. Either make music or shut the fukk up.
I always though that America was the place for whatever you want to make it. Democracy- Rule by the people
Lord Jamar is a person and has the right to express his views and try to influence actions and laws in this nation. Why do you want people to take our civil rights away as Americans?
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
545
Reputation
-20
Daps
554
Why are yall acting like black folks are really riding for this "culture"?

How many brothas in the hood do you know that are really into breaking, graffiti etc...?
Damn near nobody cares about the culture...its all a money grab. You cant be made at Vlad for seeing how stupid people are and catering to it. Same thing w/ WSHH...its a trash site, but thats what people want...its not Q's fault.
We may not be active participants but it does influence behavior. I live in Texas and all the youth call girls thots (chief keef) and some even claim black disciple (chicago gang) so you cant say hip hop doesnt influence black youth. When trinidad james first came out, people were showing up at highschool with bandanas and afros and high socks. Whatever nonsensical trend rappers start, the black youth will follow. I actually saw a video on WSHH i wish I could find it. These teens in NY were freestyling about performing fellatio (dikk sucking) and anal sex, but they were sounding real dominant with it like it was something masculine. It starts with a dress, then the prince albert dikk piercing to wear tighter jeans, add that together with gay propoganda on tv and homosexuality being taught as normal in schools and support groups like GSA (gay straight alliance) in schools and walah, the "change" we were all promised.
 

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,006
Reputation
-1,045
Daps
64,596
he's not being a racist though, he just said that outside forces are using hip hop as a vehicle to feminize black youth. I really think that men in general are being feminized in order to have a more submissive populous. But I have never had cable in my life so when I see these things they actually appear highly unordinary
The thing about his shyt is that he doesn't seem very smart, a good entertainer but not smart.
When he came out mad dudes were rocking tight clothes and go back even further to the 70s shyt would've been considered to gay for gays. It's called fashion trends nothing else.

the holes in all his arguments are humongous. I could write an essay about all the holes in his arguments. All his spurious correlations and on.
 

Doomsday

Superstar
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
10,138
Reputation
2,553
Daps
24,199
At the end of the day there is no point in having discussions like this because you don't know who you're talking to. We're supposedly 12 percent of the population in America, what percentage of black people do you think are on the internet? Even if every black person in America was an internet-a-holic it would still be more non-blacks surfing the internet, and of that percentage of blacks, half of them grew up around a healthy number of non-blacks.

My point is, contrary to popular belief, the majority of the posters on this forum (and any others, hip-hop or otherwise) will be non-black-- even if they are so obsessed with our culture that they pretend to be one of us. Therefore, you will always see a good number of posters playing devil's advocate with a contrarian point of view, unable to empathize or relate to the actual issues that pertain to black culture, because they are not actually apart of it.
 

Wacky D

PROVOCATIVE POSTING
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
40,574
Reputation
504
Daps
36,708
The thing about his shyt is that he doesn't seem very smart, a good entertainer but not smart.
When he came out mad dudes were rocking tight clothes and go back even further to the 70s shyt would've been considered to gay for gays. It's called fashion trends nothing else.

the holes in all his arguments are humongous. I could write an essay about all the holes in his arguments. All his spurious correlations and on.

people rocked tight clothes back in those days before there were any alternatives. and even then, them chits werent as tight and not nearly as feminine as the chit theyre trying to shovel now.

thats what some of yall cats dont understand when yall try to say chit like "bu bu but they were tight clothes in the '70s".
 

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,006
Reputation
-1,045
Daps
64,596
people rocked tight clothes back in those days before there were any alternatives. and even then, them chits werent as tight and not nearly as feminine as the chit theyre trying to shovel now.

thats what some of yall cats dont understand when yall try to say chit like "bu bu but they were tight clothes in the '70s".
What do you mean about alternatives? Motherfukkers loved the design, that's why they went from bigger clothes in the 50s to tighter and tighter during the 60s and 70s and then back to bigger by the 90s and then tight again by the mid 2000s.

Some static minded people who grew up in the 90s thought they ugly ass oversized shyt defined something, yes it defined an ugly ass trend.
Which might come back in the future, but hopefully not.
 

Wacky D

PROVOCATIVE POSTING
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
40,574
Reputation
504
Daps
36,708
What do you mean about alternatives? Motherfukkers loved the design, that's why they went from bigger clothes in the 50s to tighter and tighter during the 60s and 70s and then back to bigger by the 90s and then tight again by the mid 2000s.

Some static minded people who grew up in the 90s thought they ugly ass oversized shyt defined something, yes it defined an ugly ass trend.
Which might come back in the future, but hopefully not.

that chit in the 50s looked like f*ckin rags.

most black people didnt give a f*ck about fashion back then. most dudes were happy to just keep a pair of shoes that didnt talk.

:laugh: @ this chit.
 
Last edited:

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,006
Reputation
-1,045
Daps
64,596
that chit in the 50s looked like f*ckin rags.

most black people didnt give a f*ck about fashion back then. most dudes were happy to just keep a pair of shoes didnt talk.

:laugh: @ this chit.
shyt in 50s looked like rags?
People wore suits with a relatively wide silhouette and wide tie, which got tighter during the 60s. And this is also when people started experimenting outside of suits, like the whole rock-a-billy movement, the cool underground jazz clubs, the rock-n-roll movement and all that.

And who the fukk is talking about black people? I'm talking about Americans.


You might know hiphop (or not) but don't try to box with me regarding fashion.
Unless you definition of fly shyt is avirex, fubu, southpole, double digit j's and whatever the fukk.
 
Last edited:

Wacky D

PROVOCATIVE POSTING
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
40,574
Reputation
504
Daps
36,708
shyt in 50s looked like rags?
People wore suits with a relatively wide silhouette and wide tie, which got tighter during the 60s. And this is also when people started experimenting outside of suits, like the whole rock-a-billy movement, the cool underground jazz clubs, the rock-n-roll movement and all that.

And who the fukk is talking about black people? I'm talking about Americans.


You might know hiphop (or not) but don't try to box with me regarding fashion.
Unless you definition of fly shyt is avirex, fubu, southpole, double digit j's and whatever the fukk.


we're not talking americans. we're talking about black people. what the hell makes you think we're talking about anything other than that?

and then you tried to throw an insult on top of that.

yea, this lord jamar stuff really is NOT for alot of yall.

:mindblown:
 

keond

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
25,337
Reputation
12,046
Daps
212,297
Reppin
ATLANTA
though I get where youre coming from.

Were you or anyone in your family lynched or put under Jim Crow?
Can you really put that guilt onto a white kid who had nothing to do w/ it?

Its like if a white kids grandmother was raped by a black man in 1965...is it fair for kid to put that hate onto you?

My mom grew up in the south. She was born in the mid 50s so she was mos def under Jim Crow.... And since when did u have to be a direct victim to acknowledge your history. Finally it's not about guilt. It's not about hate. Those are words you floated out there. I will say that if a blk person chooses to harbor resentment towards whites, there is plenty of reasons for that. White folks are still doing their bullshyt. Jim Crow is still alive and racism rears it's ugly head daily in America, don't get shyt twisted hombre
 

Will Ross

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,714
Reputation
-6,048
Daps
59,373
that chit in the 50s looked like f*ckin rags.

most black people didnt give a f*ck about fashion back then. most dudes were happy to just keep a pair of shoes that didnt talk.

:laugh: @ this chit.

What are you talking about blacks always cared about fashion.
 
Top