Lottery winner rejects 1 million lump sums for 1k weekly payment, right move?

num123

Speak like a child
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
7,844
Reputation
2,240
Daps
33,668
Reppin
Bay Area/Chicago
I'd normally say lump sum, but at 20 I can't be too mad. She might know she doesn't have the discipline to not fukk up 1M cash. A free 4K a month is nothing to sneeze at. If she is going to try to live well, she still needs good financial planning. 4K a month might be nothing in 40 years.
If you do not have discipline to blow a million dollars, then why would they have it with a G a week? Why budget when you know you have money coming in regardless for about the next 20 years?
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
43,658
Reputation
22,239
Daps
135,216
In America, $1M for the lotto. Lump sum about 500K. Then taxes. That would leave you with about 250K.

So in that context, a 1k a week for life is not a bad deal at all.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
17,628
Reputation
5,215
Daps
70,352
Present value of money is worth more than the future value
Bingo!

One in the hand is worth two in the bush.

$1k/week = $52k/year

So roughly 20 years to hit $1M.

If you take the $1M upfront, you gotta deal with all the taxes but you know exactly what that burden is. Tax structure can/will change over time so you may lose more $$$$ with higher tax rates.

Only issue with the "lump sum" is that time value of money calc. You're not getting the full lump sum even after tax. Like if you won $500M, the cash value might be $200M, maybe $250M at the most. So then your winnings are really $250M minus taxes...not $500M minus taxes. Not sure how it works with smaller $1M prizes though.
 
Top