Lottery winner rejects 1 million lump sums for 1k weekly payment, right move?

Ezekiel 25:17

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
38,359
Reputation
3,034
Daps
135,270
Canada doesn't tax lottery winnings.

She should have took it all and took a couple hundred and opened up a high yield savings account. Depending on the interest rate, she could buy a modest house and just let the money in there grow or even partially live off that.
Take a 100 and play in the market and then splurge a bit.
$1milly ain't that much if you're planning to do anything years down the line. I borderline wouldn't even quite my job. I'd parlay it into my own biz.


Or she could blow it all on dumb shyt and be broke 2 years later:ohhh:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
69,328
Reputation
10,637
Daps
187,360
I would rather have the million because I have no clue how long I will live. 1k a week for life is amazing though.

for a young woman who'd 20 years old it keeps a lot of scammers and people who would harass her for money away if she's only getting, $1K a week.
 

Elim Garak

Veteran
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
44,744
Reputation
8,743
Daps
219,930
for a young woman who'd 20 years old it keeps a lot of scammers and people who would harass her for money away if she's only getting, $1K a week.
That's all good but I still want the M. It very well may workout for her though.
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
17,518
Reputation
3,583
Daps
57,695
Reppin
CALI
She made the right move, everyone talking about how she could've invested the million but majority of people wouldn't be able to resist blowing all that money on a bunch of bullshyt and be broke in a few years.
 

BucciMane

Kristina Schulman Bro
Supporter
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
37,066
Reputation
-2,471
Daps
81,331
Reppin
The Real Titletown
Do you lack basic understanding of inflation and the time value of money? $2mm will be worth nothing in 60 years compared to $1mm now.

Anyone not taking the lump sum money is absolutely foolish.

From a strictly financial and math perspective, anyone saying NOT to take the lump some is just flat out wrong and has zero idea what they are talking about. Their entire argument hinges on, "Oh, this person might blow their money quickly". It may have truth, but if we assume the person will be somewhat financially responsible, the lump sum is clearly the correct answer by every objective measure.

People need to understand what compound interest is. Also, I would worry down the road that a law would be passed or something along those lines where you might not receive your remaining amount. This is the easiest answer imaginable.
 

Sire366

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,188
Reputation
285
Daps
3,142
Reppin
Phila
This is why I don’t do financial advisement anymore, people are dumb. The first sentence of my reply literally addresses the fundamental issue with you proposed scenario. It even applies to this weak ass reply you typed out. Hold this neg, I’m not arguing with an idiot. :manny:
All I will say to your first statement, the relationships are not fractured. My friends have pride and don’t look for handouts. So there, I don’t understand, and nothing of what you said was financial, you only hint at stability and ability to say no, as a negative
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
39,124
Reputation
3,765
Daps
155,551
the lump sum is more valuable because of the simple time value of money. that future money is worth way less than present day money.
Yeah. But on the other hand, if you know you’re going to fukk up a lump sum, taking the payments is the better move. Money management itself is extremely simple; generally speaking, we all recognize money in vs money out. It’s the behavioral part that has people messed up, so maybe she recognizes it about herself.
 
Top